oh god blog titles

they don't promote violence.. they promote AWESOME!!

Allright, lets see what else "promotes violence" if we simply go by the standard of "it has guns and swords":

Powerpuff Girls: I happen to know that crazy chimp had some sort of pistol. And if it isn't that, it has burning cities, giant robots and alien Broccoli invasions. Does it promote violence?

Kim Possible: Also guns in it.

Bambi: His mom got Shot!

Aladdin: Swords in it.

Warner Brothers: Wowy, the coyote tries gun, machine-guns, bombs, rockets and any other ordnance he can lay hands on to catch roadrunner.

If I remember correctly even the veggietales Pirate cucumber (whatever the name was) had a sword.

 

VF: Larry had a cardboard sword.

 

No one uses swords nowadays, anyway.

 

EDIT FOR GREAT JUSTICE: You, sir, are WRONG. Fencing. Look it up.

 

I mean for actual battle, duh.

Yeah, I suppose I wasn't clear in what I meant. What I mean is that they're licensing things like Indiana Jones and Batman, (And Prince of Persia! =O ) and yet one of their starting statements (I think that's what I mean to say) was that they weren't gonna make guns.

And when they say they don't promote violence, why did they make sets of scenes like the Fight on the Flying Wing, where a guy got all cut up by the propeller? Or include the ants that eat you alive in the Jungle Cutter set? It's just odd, that's all I'm sayin'.

In before Hitler.

Congrats Cags, you have already just invoked Godwin's Law by jumping straight to Hitler.

Thanks, Captain Obvious!