Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Welcome to BZPower!

Hi there, while we hope you enjoy browsing through the site, there's a lot more you can do if you register. Some perks of joining include:
  • Create your own topics, participate in existing discussions, and vote in polls
  • Show off your creations, stories, art, music, and movies
  • Enter contests to win free LEGO sets and other prizes
  • Participate in raffles to win LEGO prizes
  • Organize with other members to attend or send your MOCs to LEGO fan events all over the world
  • Much, much more!
Enjoy your visit!


Protagonists and Such

Posted by Ta-metru_defender , in Essays, Not Rants! Nov 24 2012 · 318 views

Essays, Not Rants! 036: Protagonists And Such

Call him the main character, the lead, the hero, the player character; most every good story has a protagonist. He (or she) is the person we follow. Either because they provide the viewpoint and let us into the world or because they’re out on a grand quest. A lot of stories rise and fall based on the protagonist (or lack thereof).

The lack of a protagonist in The Phantom Menace is one of its shortcomings. Obi-Wan would make a great one, only he winds up playing second fiddle to…well, everyone for much of the film (and sits out all of Tatooine). What about Anakin? He doesn’t get introduced until Tatooine and has no character arc (what’s his motivation?) beyond being the kid who wins the podrace and blows up the droid control ship. Heck, he hardly does jack on Coruscant.
Padme, then! Only she doesn’t do much of anything (besides the senate thing) and her duplicity as to who’s actually her and who’s a handmaiden hamper our getting into her as a main character.
Fine! Qui-Gon! He’s awesome, he gets the plot moving, he can be the protagonist, right? Only no. He plays the mentor archetype, the one who guides the protagonist along. Qui-Gon is a static character who guides the plot, but has no personal investment. Plus, at the climax, the duel with Darth Maul is (sad to say) completely irrelevant to the plot.
Basically: there’s no protagonist in The Phantom Menace, no one for us to root for besides the umbrella of “the good guys”. It hampers our investment in the story. It worked for The Empire Strikes Back because we already had our investment in Luke and Han from A New Hope, but in the latter Luke was unquestionably our viewpoint character and protagonist. Menace has no such luck.

Not to say having a clear protagonist means we’ve got a good story on our hands. Let’s look at Twilight (having read a lousy book makes for good examples). Bella is unquestionably the protagonist, but she lacks anything that makes us care. She has no motivation past getting Edward to fall in love with her. She’s boring and has little characterization/use besides being an avatar for the reader. If the protagonist has no proper characterization, arc, or motivation it becomes hard to get invested.

Look, a work doesn’t have to be high art to have a protagonist. Rod, from Hot Rod, is an example of a great protagonist. Does he have characterization? He’s a delusional, hubristic wannabe stuntman, so yes. His arc is to get the girl and save his stepfather’s life so he can kick his rear. Why? Because he wants his stepfather to respect him. Yes, Hot Rod is a (hilarious) stupid film, but there’s a clear protagonist. It works! The Princess Bride has Westley and Buttercup as protagonists and Fezzik and Inigo as deuteragonists. Escape from New York has Snake Plisskin, Final Fantasy VII has Cloud, Chuck has Chuck.

But what about ensembles? Shows like Firefly, How I Met Your Mother, and Lost; who’s the actual protagonist? That’s the beauty of tv, supporting characters can all get their spot in the limelight. An episode like “Ariel” has Simon as one of the primary protagonists, or “The Constant” has Desmond as its protagonist. Several protagonists are far easier in an episodic serial.

Now the big question. The Avengers. It’s got seven main characters (Captain America, Iron Man, the Hulk, Thor, Black Widow, Hawkeye, and Loki). Who’s the protagonist?
They all are. Each one has their character arc and/or motivations (Loki wants to go home, Iron Man grows into a hero, Hawkeye wants to make up for what he did, etc). With or without the prior movies, each protagonist is set up in The Avengers and winds up as a realized character. You can call any one of them the lead (well, maybe not Hawkeye [it’s workable, but definitely a bit of a stretch]), and the movie still works. You can have multiple protagonists, so long as they’re actually protagonists and not a cast of supporting characters.

It feels like it’s the obvious thing. Stories need not just a protagonist, but a good one. Motivations, characterization, an arc and all that. A good protagonist can help even a mediocre plot. Somewhat, anyway. Y’kinda need the whole lot to tell a good story.

But you already knew that.

Also: buy my book In Transit! Each story has a clear protagonist!

  • 0

For Phantom Menace, why not JarJar? He plays a secondary character / comic relief on Tatooine for sure, but elsewhere. He's an outcast who is forced to make something of himself and does so by the end of the movie, and is certainly important to the plot. Ha. :P

    • 0
Nov 25 2012 12:27 AM
Granted it's been a long time since I've seen the movie, and honestly don't remember the plot too much, but why can't Qui-Gon function as a joint protagonist with Obi-Wan? Certainly he helped drive part of the plot during the scenes on Tatooine, and (if I recall) was responsible for introducing Anakin into the story.

I'm also confused with your Avengers argument. Does having a character arc automatically make a character (Loki in this case) a protagonist? It seems to me that he would just be a well written antagonist. Certainly Avengers isn't his story- it's the Avengers'. And the movie is certainly not told primarily through his viewpoint.

I'm not trying to say that you're wrong, but I guess I'm still just trying to figure out how you define protagonist. If Loki, or Black Widow, is one, certainly Qui-Gon can be one.
    • 0
Nov 27 2012 10:03 PM
Qui-Gon could, he just feels like he drops out often, spends more time guiding the plot than actively leading it. He's the Ben Kenobi of the story; events don't center around him nor does he have enough of an arc.

My argument for The Avengers was that you could follow anyone:
Black Widow is called up to get the Hulk, through the film she has to come to terms with someone who her usual tactics (deception/manipulation) don't work on. She winds up possibly responsible for his rampage and has to find a way to make it right.
Tony is forced to work with a group and has to stop being self-serving.
Loki wants to go home. I found this on another blog, where the writer presented Loki as the true protagonist on account of his wanting to go home to Asgard and playing all his chips to make it work.

All of them take an active role in the plot proper (rather than being the mentor ala Qui-Gon [or Nick Fury]), y'know?
    • 0


Posted Image


grew up on a ship

lives in new york

frequently found writing in a coffee shop, behind a camera, or mixing alcohol and video games

May 2018

2021 22 23242526

The Designated Tekulo Crying Corner

Just for you and your crummy feelings.


Josh works for LEGO at the LEGO Store at Rockefeller Center. Despite this, any and every opinion expressed herewith is entirely his own and decidedly not that of The LEGO Group.

In addendum, any and all opinions expressed by The LEGO Group are entirely theirs and decidedly not that of Josh


Recent Comments

Search My Blog