blogs_blog_142

Pics or it didn't happen.

Or in this case, they don't/didn't exist. EVER.

P

Pics or it didn't happen.

 

Or in this case, they don't/didn't exist. EVER.

 

P

;_;

 

B-b-b-but, they do!

 

;_;

 

BtB

Then I want Pics.

P

Then I want Pics.

 

P

How can I take pics when they don't exist? ;_;

 

BtB

You said they do exist.

I want to see pics of them as proof.

P

But we need pics for them to exist, you said so. So... it's a never ending cycle.

But we need pics for them to exist, you said so. So... it's a never ending cycle.

*nod*

 

 

BtB

PICS NOW!

NNNNNAAAAAOOOOOUUUUUGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!

 

-

Now before you two create a paradox.

 

Who two?

 

-

Bunda and Primus.

 

Should have said so before, sorry.

 

OMG TOO LATE THE PARADOX IS DRAWING ME IN HEEEAALAPALPPP----

BtB

IT'S THE APOCALYPSE!!!!1111eleventyone11!!!!1

 

Lolno.

 

-

But the paradox only occurs when Bunda's and my terms of existence are identical (i.e. both Bunda and I believe they exist or do not exist for the same reason). To Bunda, I'm going to assume that the MOCs did exist at one time. I said they didn't exist w/o pics. Which is true. To me, they don't exist, as I have never seen them. Does that mean that everything I see exists in my terms of existence? No. If it exists logically, then sure (sometimes not, though). So if Bunda's MOCs exist in Bunda's terms of existence, Bunda should be able to take pics of them and share them with us, thus allowing them to exist in my terms of existence.

Yeah.

P

But the paradox only occurs when Bunda's and my terms of existence are identical (i.e. both Bunda and I believe they exist or do not exist for the same reason). To Bunda, I'm going to assume that the MOCs did exist at one time. I said they didn't exist w/o pics. Which is true. To me, they don't exist, as I have never seen them. Does that mean that everything I see exists in my terms of existence? No. If it exists logically, then sure (sometimes not, though). So if Bunda's MOCs exist in Bunda's terms of existence, Bunda should be able to take pics of them and share them with us, thus allowing them to exist in my terms of existence.

 

Yeah.

 

P

 

And Bunda was sucked up by the paradox so you two no longer conflict, therefore there is no paradox.

 

Wait...

 

6_9

PEECZ NAAOUGHW!![/ahnold]

 

Ah well. If I never see them, I'll have never seen them.

But the paradox only occurs when Bunda's and my terms of existence are identical (i.e. both Bunda and I believe they exist or do not exist for the same reason). To Bunda, I'm going to assume that the MOCs did exist at one time. I said they didn't exist w/o pics. Which is true. To me, they don't exist, as I have never seen them. Does that mean that everything I see exists in my terms of existence? No. If it exists logically, then sure (sometimes not, though). So if Bunda's MOCs exist in Bunda's terms of existence, Bunda should be able to take pics of them and share them with us, thus allowing them to exist in my terms of existence.

 

Yeah.

 

P

 

...wha?