Jump to content
  • entries
    30
  • comments
    76
  • views
    20,132

The Original Makuta

emily

Entry posted by emily

2,802 views

 Share

So a while ago Lucina put up this excellent blog entry about a tantalizing piece of dialogue that we got from Makuta in Mask of Light, that never really went anywhere. It's a nice little piece of "what if" to consider, but ultimately the existence of the dialogue could be fairly well explained as another example of all of the weird nonsense that was going on at the end of Mask of Light. "We'll awaken Mata Nui, except we won't!" "All of the island's inhabitants must gather at the Kini-Nui and then come underground, except not really!" etc.

 

Or at least, that's what I thought until Torsti put up the ISOs for the CDs in his BIONICLE Style Guide. There is an extremely interesting note made in the introduction:

 

The Rahi are beasts influenced by the infected masks they wear; the Bohrok are carrying out a legitimate mission, and only lack of understanding of the part of others makes them seem bad. Even Makuta will eventually be shown to have good reasons for his seemingly nasty behavior... it is his methods that are at fault more than his motivation.

 

 

Now, try to rectify that with the "bwahaha I will put Mata Nui to sleep and take over the world because I'm evil" Makuta we got. It's impossible. There is simply no way to cover both with one character. So I'm going to put forth a theory: it would seem that up to and through 2003, Makuta had a legitimate and potentially very interesting motivation for plaguing the islanders. By the point Legends of Metru Nui came out in 2004, the story team had rewritten him to be a more "kid-friendly" villain fitting into a black-and-white paradigm.

 

But that leaves us to wonder what Makuta's original motivation was. The line from MoL explains why he is doing what he is doing, at least (he believes that Mata Nui's reawakening will cause him pain, and so he does his best to prevent the people trying to awaken him from achieving their goal). But then why does he believe that Mata Nui's reawakening will be to his detriment? Why did he send him to sleep in the first place?

 

Like, really, if you have an idea, let me know. Without seeing something like the 2001 story bible, which would contain the core plot as it was initially conceived., it may just be one of those things that is impossible to know.

  • Upvote 13
 Share

6 Comments

Recommended Comments

fishers64

Torsti's style guide is the bomb. But that happens to almost all stories, I think - you have a lot of ideas of how something could go, but only one is the right one. 

Link to comment
Takuma Nuva

Wait, this is a thing? I always just assumed that the pain Mata Nui was spared was from the poison that Makuta infected him with in the first place. Not that Makuta really cared about Mata Nui feeling pain to begin with.


Takuma Nuva

Link to comment
emily

But that happens to almost all stories, I think - you have a lot of ideas of how something could go, but only one is the right one. 

Oh, certainly. But what I am proposing here is that there was already a distinct plan in mind for the direction Makuta would go, and then later the decision was made to change that direction, retroactively leaving some anomalies in the story 2001-03. It's a little different from going through the creative process and then writing the story, because in this case the creative process alters the story.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
believe victims

Wait, this is a thing? I always just assumed that the pain Mata Nui was spared was from the poison that Makuta infected him with in the first place. Not that Makuta really cared about Mata Nui feeling pain to begin with.

Takuma Nuva

 

That poison was the same virus he infected in the first place, though. It seems odd that he would mention it the way he did if it was pain he consciously caused, and even more strange for the writers to have him say it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
fishers64

 

But that happens to almost all stories, I think - you have a lot of ideas of how something could go, but only one is the right one. 

Oh, certainly. But what I am proposing here is that there was already a distinct plan in mind for the direction Makuta would go, and then later the decision was made to change that direction, retroactively leaving some anomalies in the story 2001-03. It's a little different from going through the creative process and then writing the story, because in this case the creative process alters the story.

 

Which is why prior planning prevents poor performance. :P

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
×
  • Create New...