Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Welcome to BZPower!

Hi there, while we hope you enjoy browsing through the site, there's a lot more you can do if you register. The process is easy and you can use your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account to make it even faster. Some perks of joining include:
  • Create your own topics, participate in existing discussions, and vote in polls
  • Show off your creations, stories, art, music, and movies and play member and staff-run games
  • Enter contests to win free LEGO sets and other prizes, and vote to decide the winners
  • Participate in raffles, including exclusive raffles for new members, and win free LEGO sets
  • Send private messages to other members
  • Organize with other members to attend or send your MOCs to LEGO fan events all over the world
  • Much, much more!
Enjoy your visit!

Scrimmy Bingus and the Crungy Spingus



Photo

Informal Protector Reviews

Posted by Dina Saruyama , Jan 14 2015 · 134 views

Protector of Jungle
  • bow is nice aesthetically but a pain to pose. He can hardly even hold it like he’d be comfortable aiming.
  • lanky limbs are offset by the Liefield-esque chest. A slimmer torso would have made a much more sprightly Protector
  • Too little solid green; I’d rather have 3/4 of the trans green shells be solid green, with the one under the add-on solid. the trans green should be an accent, not the main color, imo
  • still salty about using Bright Green over classic Dark Green

Protector of Water
  • same as Protector of Jungle, slender limbs are offset by bulky body. it’s also noticeably gappy from the side
  • weapon is better than Protector of Jungle’s in that its best pose is simple to achieve
  • only one dark azure piece but assorted pieces in two different shades of trans blue? the color scheme is ridiculously at odds with what the mask suggests is the main color
  • not enough yellow highlights to justify honking yellow turbines

Protector of Ice
  • bulky body actually fits with bulky arms so no complaints there. makes for a bundled-up look
  • arms are proportionate but difficult to pose
  • i hate buzzsaws but that’s personal
  • the stud shooter weapon is much less integrated compared to every other Protector. I wish they’d tried to make a bigger, more integrated weapon instead of this weak thing and a buzzsaw (which i hate)
  • the silver feet are offputting. it would have been nice to see them in white, but barring that, both the Protector of Fire and Protector of Water have silver elsewhere on their bodies; either could have had silver feet instead in exchange for black feet on this one, which would have stood out less.



Photo

D&D

Posted by Dina Saruyama , Jan 12 2015 · 143 views

don't worry this isn't a revival of that blog fad

I recently joined a D&D campaign being run by a friend of mine due to start next week and have been enjoying setting up my character. Just today, I drew her, and I figured it would be entirely relevant to my BZP blogging habits to post the picture.

Posted Image

Her name is Hjördís Ermentrud. She is of a fictional race called the Darkrunners, who are basically humanoid Velociraptors. My friend was happy to inform me that they can be completely feathered, which I obviously ran with. Her coloration is based on that of a peregrine falcon, but with creative liberties taken to both add aesthetic appeal and make it easier to draw. The shading is iffy because i'm still getting the hang of shading, and the feet might be a little small, but I'm pretty pleased with how it turned out.


Photo

Have I complained about Jurassic World here yet?

Posted by Dina Saruyama , Jan 04 2015 · 340 views

You groan. "No," you grouch, "and I was hoping you never would." However, you clicked on an entry about Jurassic Park by me knowing full well what that entails, so chances are you're going to read the whole thing anyway.

Jurassic World is the latest in a series of movies that have probably done as much harm to public perception of dinosaurs as they have good. However, its impact will be worse than the previous three, almost entirely because of when it's being released.

Jurassic Park, for all the flaws I will happily call out, was actually rather revolutionary for a dinosaur film. Besides some very stupid errors, the dinosaurs were portrayed as more active and more realistic as animals than ever before. It brought then-modern depictions of dinosaurs to an audience that sorely needed to see them. This, I acknowledge.

Now, it's been what, twenty years since the original movie? Something like that? Why, we've discovered all kinds of things about dinosaurs since then! Think of the feathers! Think of the lifestyles we can emulate from our best guesses! Think of how much we could expand on the original movie's idea of dinosaurs evolving into birds! Thinking of all that?

Well, they didn't. In fact, they practically thumb their nose at paleontologists with the phrase "We have learned more in the past decade from genetics than a century of digging up bones". Just as Jurassic Park brought dinosaurs from the 90s to the audiences in the 90s, so too does Jurassic World bring dinosaurs from the 90s to audiences in 2015. Their skin is wrinkly and elephantine, their pupils are slitted, and even their mosasaur has a "frill" running down its back, straight from a 60's illustration.

And it's not just me who's disappointed. Actual paleontologists, people who make their career doing this sort of thing, are disappointed in how little thought was put into this. If Jurassic Park was a loving nod to paleontology, Jurassic World is a kick in the groin. This isn't a dinosaur movie, it's a monster movie.

Now, there are a couple arguments as to why the dinosaurs "needed" to look like this, most of which are complete bull. The first thing anyone says is "continuity", which is absurd, because if it was about continuity, the dinosaurs would not look like those from the first movie; they'd look like those from the third, the last Jurassic Park movie before this one. That's how continuity works.

"They were genetically engineered to look this way!" Okay, who's going to say that to the audience? Who's going to straight-up say "this is not what actual dinosaurs looked like"? Or is this being left up to fan theories to explain away criticisms made by people who care? Because if nobody in the movie says "this is not what dinosaurs look like", a majority of the people who see the movie will think "this is what dinosaurs look like", which is what I care about here. It's not just about the inaccurate depictions, but about the fact that people take these inaccurate depictions as fact. As a result, there are people who will vehemently oppose any dinosaur depiction that doesn't match what they saw in Jurassic Park. That's why it matters how clear it is that this is not how dinosaurs looked.

Next up, someone says "it's just a movie" and tells me to stop making such a big deal out of this. I smirk like a Yu-Gi-Oh character as I reveal you have activated my trap card, Scientific Study. It rationally explains the effect media has on public understanding of science, sending your Bad Argument to the Shadow Realm. I place a face-down card and end my turn.

"So then, Wise Jess," you say, bowing before my humble form, "what do you think the reason for not changing the dinosaurs is?"

Well, it's simple: nostalgia. A majority of the people who are going to buy tickets for this movie are already enormous fans of the original film, and what that means is they've already made up their mind about changing their precious "velociraptors" and "T rexes" and they will not stand for any of it. Just look at the massive backlash paleontologists have received for voicing their concerns; the Jurassic Park fanbase is very resistant to changes in our understanding of paleontology. Just about any BANDit (BAND=Birds Are Not Dinosaurs) will cite Jurassic Park depictions as what they believe dinosaurs looked like as they fight against the idea of feathered dinosaurs.

So in the end, this was a foregone conclusion. Dinosaurs are so entrenched in the idea they have to look "cool" that at this point, the Jurassic Park franchise has no choice but to stick with outdated dinosaurs until the end of time, or else they lose their fanbase, which claims to "love" dinosaurs. Love is in quotations, because as I put it rather recently:

This is our best understanding of what dinosaurs were like, plain and simple. If you dislike that, fine, enjoy your movie monsters with slobbering jaws and elephantine grey skin. But just remember every day you do so that what you're enjoying isn't dinosaurs. You stopped loving dinosaurs long ago. What you love now is a crude, outdated facsimile that you cling to like a security blanket because it's "awesome".




Photo

Food For Thought

Posted by Dina Saruyama , Jan 03 2015 · 229 views

Why are all the police officers in Space Police III human, but all of the criminals are aliens?


Photo

R.I.P. Leelah Alcorn

Posted by Dina Saruyama , Dec 30 2014 · 286 views

She was the latest in casualties of a violent, hateful war against people like us and her death is heartbreaking in its horrificness.

If this entry is not allowed by BZP rules, please let me know, but it had better be a darn good reason.






Views

Posted Image
Posted Image

Testimonials

Honestly, you can make this sound like some kind of crusade for justice all you want (I'm going to hope that some of how you worded it is just meant as hyperbole to make a point, though?), but it just comes across to me as being anti-fun and anti-imagination.

 

There's a time and a place for joke entries to place high in a contest (actually no there really isn't but w/e), but the first site-wide BZP contest is certainly not one of those times.

 

The first entry offended my eyes.

 

Well, this was probably in the bottom 3 comics I've read in my life. Didn't make much sense, and some things were hard to read because of the coloring and font style.

 
 

3 user(s) viewing

1 members, 1 guests, 1 anonymous users


DeeVee

Recent Comments

March 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29 30 31