"Dark"
What does it mean for a story to be "dark"?
Does it mean it has death? It can't be; people died in Transformers: Animated, and I've yet to see it described as dark.
So what is it about death that makes something dark? Well, based on things I've seen described as "dark" (The Dark Knight trilogy, Michael Bay's Transformers, Bionicle 2005-2008), I'd say a "dark" story places an emphasis on killing, and on casual disregard for life. The more reference to death and deadliness, the more mature your story! A cavalier attitude towards life is a mark of a dark story.
Does it mean it has a deep, mature story? It can't be; the Transformers film is a bunch of explosions loosely held together by the thin threads of what might be called a plot if you squint at it, yet it's still dark. On the other hand, Land Before Time has a quite well-written and arguable mature story (ignoring its characters roles as talking 80's dinosaurs), yet only the most foolhardy would describe it as a dark film.
So what is it about "mature" stories that makes something dark? Well, taking a sampling of "dark" media again, it would seem the most important aspect is that no one is happy. Everyone is grimacing, or scowling, or in emotional anguish, everything is in low-key lighting, there's guns everywhere, and everyone want to kill. (Anyone who doesn't is naïve and will soon be "fixed".) In "dark" stories, happiness only exists to be stamped out by the cruel, cruel, world. Because hating everything is realistic!
Does it mean it has deep, complex characters? Can't be; movieverse Transformers have personalities that would blow away in a light wind, while Parks and Rec has deep, rich characters that feel like real people.
So what kind of characters make a dark film? From my experience (and as alluded to above), they care little for the consequences of death, are always angry, and have a penchant for one-liners that could be swapped out between any two characters to the same effect. They are not necessarily deep, nor complex, nor even realistic.
Does being "dark" mean being a good story? Of course not. There are many movies that are praised for being dark and edgy that are honestly the cinematic equivalent to devouring your own toe jam. They exist only for you to walk in, turn your brain off, and watch a bunch of people with weapons kill each other.
Does being "dark" mean being a bad story? I don't necessarily think so. I've watched movies that might be described as dark (i.e. Snowpiercer) that were also good, strong stories with rich characters. Being "dark" and being good aren't mutually exclusive.
The trick is that the story's defining feature shouldn't be that darkness. If all people can say about is that it was "dark and edgy", chances are it's let its story flop by the wayside to maximize the sheer edge. Characters become unbelievable for the sake of being gritty, story becomes irrelevant to the need for pure bloodbaths, and any remotely human emotion is removed unless it's blind rage.
A story cannot survive on being "dark" alone, and that should definitely not be the end goal of all stories. Being a well-written and solid story is a far more palatable idea, and if that means "sacrificing" the need to be "dark" so you can be "mature" and draw in the kind of audience who watches something solely because it's "dark", then so be it. In my opinion, they aren't even worth catering to.
- 4
2 Comments
Recommended Comments