If a certain religious text happens to contain words that other people consider swears, It isn't swearing, because It uses them according to their proper definition. (Plus, many of them were not considered curse words when translated.)
Many curse words have legitimate definitions, that are more often today used improperly as swears. But I'm not saying you should use them in their legitimate sense just to insult someone. You'd be missing my point.
I was originally going to say this in the original editorial, but I didn't want it brought up. Since it was brought up anyway, I thought I might expand on that, but the discussion ends now.
I've had too many bad experiences with borderline religious/political discussion on BZP, so I'm just not going to give it the chance.