Suspension Of Disbelief
What really annoys me is when a fictional story is called implausible.
This message brought to you after reading a quick review for Liam Neeson's latest thriller movie Unknown, which I saw this weekend. (Enjoyable, nice twist, not as good as Taken.)
The review said it was too implausible to be really enjoyable. I have come across the problem in other instances, all the while being fine with whatever implausibility there was. (Example: Eagle Eye.)
My response: Suck it up and suspend your disbelief! It's like they walk out of Star Trek and complain about it because it's not real. Or there could never be the monstrous gorilla in King Kong. Or that robots will never rise up and enslave us (The Matrix) or kill us (The Terminator--also note the time travel and paradoxes in this series). And just about everything in any fantasy series (especially Lord of the Rings.)
And that is why I will always like science-fiction and fantasy more than the realistic stuff out there. I need to escape this dull world where the only news is about the latest killing in some far-off country. (That, or celebrity gossip. Take your pick.)
(OK, in my defense, there is some good "realistic stuff" that I have read. I am more pointing an evil eye towards the books I have to read for school. At least a hundred years old, no longer relevant, and not pertaining to me. (Does sci-fi pertain to me? No, but at least it's being cool.))
I'm going to be writing an essay for a scholarship in school where I have to list what books I would buy with the $1000 B&N gift card prize, and why, and how they would help my college career. I plan on making it slightly satirical where I talk more about enjoying books relevant to my interests than needing specific books that are "classics" and are quite respectable.
-CF
7 Comments
Recommended Comments