Jump to content

Akano's Blog

  • entries
    296
  • comments
    724
  • views
    196,555

Equation of the Day #9: Time Dilation and Length Contraction


Akano

1,199 views

Today I want to talk about something awesome: Special Relativity. It's a theory that was developed by this guy you may have heard of, Albert Einstein, and it's from this theory that arguably the most famous equation in physics, E = mc2, comes from. I'm not going to talk about E = mc2 today (in fact, I've already talked about it, but it's not the whole story!), but I wanted to talk about two other cool consequences of Special Relativity (SR), time dilation and length contraction.

 

First and foremost, the main fact from which the rest of SR falls out is the fact that the speed of light is the same for all observers moving with constant velocity, regardless of what those velocities may be. Running at 5 m/s? You see light traveling at the same speed as someone traveling 99% the speed of light.

 

Wait, how can that be? This idea originally came from Maxwell's equations, which govern electromagnetism. When you solve these equations, you can put them into a form that results in a wave equation, and the speed of those waves is equal to that of light. This finding brought on the realization that light is an electromagnetic wave! But here's the interesting thing: Maxwell's equations do not assume any particular frame of reference, so the speed of the waves governed by Maxwell's equations have the same speed in all reference frames. Thus, it makes sense from an electromagnetic point of view that the speed of light shouldn't depend on how fast someone is traveling!

 

Now, we're still in a bit of a pickle; if all observers see light traveling at the same speed, how do things other than light move? Think about it. If you're driving down the highway at 60 mph and the car next to you is driving 65 mph, they appear to be moving 5 mph faster than you, don't they? So why doesn't this work with light? If I'm traveling 5 mph, shouldn't I see light moving 5 mph slower than normal? No; the problem here isn't that the speed of light is the same for all observers, but the fact that we think relative velocities add up normally. In fact, this relative velocity addition is simply a very good approximation for objects that are much, much slower than light, but it is not complete.

 

The answer to this conundrum is that

. These two principles are governed by the equations

 

ZomEOyg.png

 

The first equation determines time dilation, and the second equation determines length contraction, when shifting from a frame moving at speed v to a frame moving at speed v' (β and γ are both physical parameters that depend on the velocity of the frame in question and the speed of light, c). From the first equation, we can see that the faster someone is moving in frame S (moving at speed v), the slower their clock ticks away the seconds in frame S' (moving at speed v') and the more squished they look (in the direction that they're traveling). These ideas are the basis for the famous "barn and pole" paradox. Suppose someone is holding a pole of length L and is running into a barn, which from door-to-door has a length slightly longer than L. If the person runs fast enough, an outside observer will see that the person running with the pole will completely disappear into the barn before emerging from the other side. But from the runner's frame of reference, the barn is what is moving really fast, and so the barn appears shorter than it did to the outside observer. This means that, in the runner's frame, a part of the pole is always outside of the barn, and thus he is always exposed.

 

What if the observer outside the barn had the exit door closed and the entrance door open and rigs it such that when the runner is completely inside the barn, the entrance door closes and the exit door opens? Well, in the outside observer's frame, this is what happens; the entrance door closing and the exit door opening are simultaneous events. But in the runner's frame, there is no way for him to fit inside the barn, so does the door close on the pole? No, because the physics of what happens has to be the same in both frames; either the door shuts on the pole or it doesn't. So, in the runner's frame, the entrance door closing and the exit door opening are not simultaneous events! In fact, the exit door opens before the entrance door closes in the runner's frame. This is due to the time dilation effect of special relativity: simultaneous events in one reference frame need not be simultaneous in other frames!

 

Special relativity is a very rich topic that I hope to delve into more in the future, but for now I'll leave you with this awesome bit of cool physics. :)

 

TmFf04p.png

  • Upvote 3

10 Comments


Recommended Comments

The fact that time can't be absolute, and thesame for all observers has to be one of those things that fascinate me the most about special relativity.

It's also quite funny (IMO, at least) that all those things make sense although being seemingly counter-intuitive at first.

 

(also, I guess I've already said so, but I really enjoy your writing style in these entries. :3 )

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment

Arg. Science and math... A love I will never understand.

 

Now excuse me while I calculate the new values for substances that undergo chemical reactions involving heat and time for human consumption.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment

The fact that time can't be absolute, and thesame for all observers has to be one of those things that fascinate me the most about special relativity.

It's also quite funny (IMO, at least) that all those things make sense although being seemingly counter-intuitive at first.

It's interesting that you say that, because every time I've heard teachers discuss special relativity, they always wonder why it isn't taught sooner; the math is not very complicated, but the concepts are very much against our everyday experience.

 

(also, I guess I've already said so, but I really enjoy your writing style in these entries. :3 )

Thanks! ^_^ I try to write these with a broad audience in mind; I show the equations just so that readers can see them (and maybe play with them if they want), but I try not to get bogged down in calculations or heavy math manipulations, just concepts.

 

Arg. Science and math... A love I will never understand.

 

Now excuse me while I calculate the new values for substances that undergo chemical reactions involving heat and time for human consumption.

There's science everywhere.

 

akanohi.png

Link to comment

The math just went over my head, but I think I get the concept. Now I want to put my desk going at 200 mph so that my day feels so much longer. :)

Link to comment

Man, this reminds me of that time when I was seventeen and I read a book about string theory and stuff like this for fun.

....the heck was wrong with me?? :blink:


Takuma Nuva

Link to comment

The math just went over my head, but I think I get the concept. Now I want to put my desk going at 200 mph so that my day feels so much longer. :)

EDITED: Time will go by normally for you, but someone outside your fast desk would age ever so slightly more than you would. 200 mph, BTW, is about three millionths of the speed of light. In one day, the difference between your clock and the clock of someone at rest would be about 7.5 nanoseconds (if my math is right). So, in one day, you would get enough time for you atoms to jingle a little bit, but not enough for you to do anything worth noting.

 

 

Man, this reminds me of that time when I was seventeen and I read a book about string theory and stuff like this for fun.

 

....the heck was wrong with me?? :blink:

 

Takuma Nuva

 

Absolutely nothing.

 

akanohi.png

Link to comment

200 mph, BTW, is a little over one thousandth of the speed of light.

 

I think you forgot to convert your units there. The speed of light is 186,000 miles per second, not per hour (it's 671 million mph), so time dilation even at that speed would be completely unnoticeable. :psychotwitch:

 

-kkespin.gif

Link to comment

 

200 mph, BTW, is a little over one thousandth of the speed of light.

I think you forgot to convert your units there. The speed of light is 186,000 miles per second, not per hour (it's 671 million mph), so time dilation even at that speed would be completely unnoticeable. :psychotwitch:

 

-kkespin.gif

 

Curse those 3600 seconds per hour! Yes, I forgot to do that; that makes the total amount of time gained roughly 7.5 nanoseconds. Plenty of time for your atoms to jingle a little bit. :P

 

Also note: even physics grad students have trouble with unit conversions sometimes.

 

akanohi.png

Link to comment

I see. So my nefarious plot to break time needs much enhancements.

 

Although that confuses me slightly, because you mentioned runners and barn doors, and time dilation being noted as different, but if I'm going 200 mph, much faster than any runner could ever go, it wouldn't be evident as time dilation to an observer?

Link to comment

I see. So my nefarious plot to break time needs much enhancements.

 

Although that confuses me slightly, because you mentioned runners and barn doors, and time dilation being noted as different, but if I'm going 200 mph, much faster than any runner could ever go, it wouldn't be evident as time dilation to an observer?

Ah, so the barn-pole paradox is a thought-experiment; indeed, there is no way a runner could possibly run fast enough to produce noticeable enough length contraction (imagine instead that there's a super fast rocket traveling through the barn, and the rocket is longer than the barn is).

 

In actuality, to produce noticeable time dilation, you need to be moving a significant fraction of the speed of light; for instance, if someone were traveling at .6 c, their γ factor would be 1.25, and a 24-hour day to an outside observer would be 30 hours long to the fast-traveling observer. So, getting up to 3/5 of the speed of light only increases your day by 25%; going .8 c gives you a day that is 16 hours longer (66.67%).

 

akanohi.png

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...