unpopular opinion time Entry posted by believe victims March 21, 2014 951 views Share More sharing options... Followers 1 Pluto should never have been considered a planet 3
Xaeraz Posted March 21, 2014 Except by all knowledge in 1930, unless I'm severely mistaken, there were no other known planets outside the solar system. It would have been an arbitrary and meaningless decision at the time. 2 Quote Link to comment
Makaru Posted March 21, 2014 ow my childhood which coincidentally existed for a good portion of the duration Pluto was actually considered a planet 4 Quote Link to comment
Portalfig Posted March 21, 2014 I was like eight or nine, IIRC, when I learned that Pluto was no longer considered a planet. I was so mad. Quote Link to comment
xccj Posted March 21, 2014 It totally ruins The Magic Schoolbus. "We searched for Mr. Frizzle on all 8 of the planets and didn't find her; where else could she be??" 2 Quote Link to comment
Scanty Demon Posted March 21, 2014 You're opinion is bad and you should feel bad because MUH PLUTO! 3 Quote Link to comment
Hahli Husky Posted March 21, 2014 (tbh because no image-only replies, I have no strong feelings so yeah) Quote Link to comment
Sumiki Posted March 22, 2014 Am I the only person in the world who doesn't care whatsoever whether or not Pluto is technically a planet or not? 2 Quote Link to comment
fishers64 Posted March 22, 2014 Am I the only person in the world who doesn't care whatsoever whether or not Pluto is technically a planet or not?Nope. Quote Link to comment
Aanchir Posted March 22, 2014 To be fair, when it was first discovered, we had every reason to think it was a planet. It seemed far larger than it really was (since it and its moon Charon were difficult to differentiate at first), and we didn't know a thing about the Kuiper Belt that occupies its orbital region. It's basically the same as how we thought Ceres was a planet until the asteroid belt was discovered (coincident with Pluto's demotion, Ceres was promoted from "the largest of the asteroids" to dwarf planet status, since like Pluto it is large enough to have shaped itself into a sphere). So with perfect knowledge, no, we might not have considered Pluto a planet to begin with. But because of our imperfect knowledge of Pluto and objects like it, it was hard to classify from the get-go. Overall, there were strong scientific grounds for Pluto's demotion, and it shouldn't have been anywhere near as controversial as it was. Though I sometimes joke that instead of dwarfism, a better diagnosis would be "Accretion-Deficit Kuiperactivity Disorder". Still haven't gotten a single laugh out of that one. :/ 3 Quote Link to comment
11 Comments
Recommended Comments