Jump to content
  • entries
    3
  • comments
    18
  • views
    4,503

Gen 2 wasn't Bionicle

Irrie

581 views

Before I start this, I would like to preface saying that this will not be one of those complaints about how it didn't capture the mystical aspect of 2001. Because as many of us know, "mystical aspect" is code for "fond childhood memories" that is very difficult to replicate after you've stepped into the cynical years of adulthood.

 

However I would like to bring up a perspective that I've held for quite a while now. To address this we must first ask ourselves "what even is Bionicle?"

 

Obviously opinions will vary, however mine is that Bionicle was a story-driven toy line (or a toy-driven storyline if you want to be hypercritical of it) that followed the adventures of tiny robots inside of a big robot, and then some half-robots on a desert planet. Not robots living on an island called Okoto.

 

Why? Because Bionicle, in its conception, was the generation one storyline. A hard reboot in a different universe doesn't qualify it to be equivalent to the first generation.

 

Sure, they may have the same characters, but are they even the same? Look at all of them, particularly Pohatu. Their personalities are different, and what even is a character if you take out its personality? I'd say nothing. And so if you change the personality, you essentially have a different character on your hands.

 

However the fact that the overarching storyline does not exist in the first canon is what does it. This reboot was in no way connected to the original storyline, save a few cosmetic details. Therefor, why do we consider them to be similar when they aren't?

 

The first Bionicle and the second Bionicle are two different themes that should be treated as such. Gen 2 is about as connected to Gen 1 as Hero Factory is connected to Exo-Force. Recycling names doesn't allude to a continuity.

 

However, this may look as if I'm being critical of Gen 2. I'm not, in fact I'm a big admirer of what they did with it, particularly in the set department. What I would have preferred is if they had marketed it as a separate theme.

 

But this begs the question, would that have been good or bad for the theme's sales? Obviously marketing it as Bionicle will help with sales among the older fans. We saw how much hype there was. I can testify, I remember going to Target to buy all six Toa on January 2nd 2015. However what would have been better, in my opinion, would have been to completely distance itself from the original line and run it on a different name. It shouldn't have been a failed attempt at resurrecting an old fandom. They should have let the first Bionicle rest in its original glory, and the theme to replace Hero Factory would have had a newer, fresher, storyline. I'm going to go against the grain here and say that it should have cared less about the older fans, and more about the younger ones. I feel that Gen 2's potential was severely harmed by the designers feeling like they owe us anything. All that money spent on the creation of the golden masks could have been used in more productive areas of expenditure.

 

But in times like this, everybody thinks they know something. Who am I to say that I'm smarter than the next guy?



3 Comments


Recommended Comments

To me, reboot means they can change whatever they want as long as the very core concept is there. Either way, it's robots running around fighting evil on an island. Reboot means we discard all the old besides what they choose to keep.

 

So, you're right. Don't connect it with the original. Don't bring it down because they changed things around.

 

 

(This is a terribly constructed argument please forgive me)

 

(Also hey you got premier again congrats)

  • Upvote 2

Share this comment


Link to comment

To me, reboot means they can change whatever they want as long as the very core concept is there. Either way, it's robots running around fighting evil on an island. Reboot means we discard all the old besides what they choose to keep.

 

So, you're right. Don't connect it with the original. Don't bring it down because they changed things around.

 

 

(This is a terribly constructed argument please forgive me)

 

(Also hey you got premier again congrats)

Nah, I just haven't done anything with the years membership that I bought. I think it's about to expire. 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Counterpoint: Batman movies and cartoons often present the same characters with vastly different personalities and tell stories with vastly different tones, but they're still all Batman movies and cartoons. My Little Pony cartoons changed radically between generations, including changing the personalities of specific named characters, but they're still all My Little Pony cartoons. All things considered, the things that stayed the same between generations one and two of Bionicle are easily just as numerous as the things that stayed the same between generations three and four of My Little Pony, or between the 1966 and 1989 Batman movies. Would you say that the current My Little Pony cartoon is not actually My Little Pony? Would you say that Tim Burton's Batman is not actually Batman?

 

As for it being a different universe/continuity, that's par for the course with reboots. Batman: The Movie from 1966 takes place in a different universe than Batman from 1989. Spider-Man from 2002 takes place in a different universe than The Amazing Spider-Man from 2012. My Little Pony from 1986 takes place in a different universe than My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic from 2010. The 1987 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles TV series takes place in a different universe from the 2012 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles TV series. Has no other IP you've loved ever been rebooted before? This is how it works. It doesn't mean that the reboot of the franchise is any less real or authentic than the original. It's just re-interpreted or re-imagined to appeal to a new generation of fans. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but its effectiveness is not a measure of its authenticity.

 

Reducing a series, particularly one as elaborate as Bionicle, to what it shares a timeline with or how its characters are portrayed, is doing the series a huge disservice. There's just no way to convincingly argue that G2 Bionicle was not still Bionicle.

  • Upvote 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...