Jump to content
  • entries
    610
  • comments
    1,306
  • views
    415,935

Giant Robots


Ta-metru_defender

614 views

Essays, Not Rants! 289: Giant Robots

 

It is no secret that I absolutely adore Pacific Rim. Granted, and watching giant mechs and giant mechs beat the stuffing outta each other is only a part of it. See, there’s the pure childish glee to it, the great speech, and, of course, its youthful and hopeful worldview. Pacific Rim is a movie about giant mechs and giant monsters, but it’s because it’s so much more than the battle between Jaegers and Kaiju that the movie made the impression it did, it’s why it matters more than you’d expect.

 

A sequel was up in the air for a while, and, eventually, Guillermo del Toro stepped aside from directing again and Steven S. DeKnight filled in as writer/director and the project officially went into production. There were rumors online about the studio ousting del Toro, but given that he still has a producing credit and DeKnight was in touch with him, it’s safe to say his vision is still there.

 

So naturally, I watched the trailer for the sequel, Pacific Rim: Uprising as soon as I could. And man, it delivers on more giant mechs fighting giant monsters. And a multinational team, which is something very important to me, obvious. And it’s a glorious trailer, with new robots fighting new monsters in a city and stuff getting destroyed and swords slashing and all that cool stuff.

 

But all the same, it seems to me that there’s a bit that’s being lost.

 

Let me preface the following with this: It looks awesome. Mecha action is something near and dear to my heart, and getting to see a glimpse of those behemoths fighting is, of course, a joy. I’m here for it.

 

But.

 

Guillermo del Toro’s a self-described pacifist. He deliberately avoids making movies about war, and Pacific Rim was no different. The leader of the Pan Pacific Defense Corps isn’t a general, but rather a Marshal (named Stacker Pentecost, but the ridiculous awesomeness of that name is unimportant here). The Jaeger pilots aren’t Captains or Lieutenants, but rather Rangers. Pacific Rim avoids much militaristic imagery, and there’s no room for jingoism in a movie about an international team fighting monsters. This is all deliberate, as del Toro "…wanted was for kids to see a movie where they don’t need to aspire to be in an army to aspire for an adventure."[*]

 

Even the action in the movie follows this trend. Sure, there’s epic destruction, but the operating protocol for the Jaeger pilots is to keep the Kaiju away from the city. When a kaiju attacks Sydney, it’s because it breached the wall that was supposed to keep them out. The fight in Hong Kong is after the defenders have been overwhelmed, and much ado (and a subplot) is made out of making sure civilians evacuate to shelters. When the punching and hitting starts, it’s a lot of punching and outlandish weapons. Gipsy Danger has an energy blaster and a sword, Striker Eureka rockets and knives, Cherno Alpha is really good at punching stuff. It’s fantastical, it’s fun.

 

There’s a shot in the Uprising trailer that looks like one out of the matrix, with empty bullet shells falling to the ground behind a Jaeger. It’s cool — because of course it’s cool — but I’d be lying if I didn’t say it gave me a measure of concern. Part of what made Pacific Rim so wonderful was it being removed from reality; once the Jaegers started going there wasn’t much in the ways of actual guns. All the violence was out there, fantastical, giant robots punching and giant swords and rockets.

 

I love Pacific Rim. And I wanna love Uprising too. But lightning in a bottle was caught once, and I’m wary of a followup. Maybe I’m wrong, maybe DeKnight’s got more going on than the trailer lets on. Maybe it’ll be as hopeful and idealistic as the first one. But as we get set to enjoy more mecha versus kaiju action, I want to remember how darn special Pacific Rim is, and how much a sequel has to live up to not only in quality but also in theming. Maybe Uprising won’t have the special sauce that made Pacific Rim so good.

 

But.

 

It’s still gonna be giant mechs beating up giant monsters.

 

And I’ll take it.

  • Upvote 3

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

This essay could have also been titled "Why Pacific Rim is a good film, and the Transformers films are not." Because at the end of the day, the former movie is powered by optimism and multiculturalism, while the latter franchise is consumed with cynicism and jingoism. And I'm not just talking about the humans in Transformers, either - I'm talking about titular robots, specifically the ones the film frames as the "good guys." It doesn't matter that the Decepticons are portrayed as murderous creeps, because the Autobots are just as bad, and yet they claim they are doing what is best for both their own race and for humanity. All of this, in a franchise based on a kids toy. Thanks for nothing, Michael Bay.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment

i just wanna know why they're suddenly all using bladed weapons when it was established why the sword was a last resort in the first film

Link to comment

This essay could have also been titled "Why Pacific Rim is a good film, and the Transformers films are not." Because at the end of the day, the former movie is powered by optimism and multiculturalism, while the latter franchise is consumed with cynicism and jingoism. And I'm not just talking about the humans in Transformers, either - I'm talking about titular robots, specifically the ones the film frames as the "good guys." It doesn't matter that the Decepticons are portrayed as murderous creeps, because the Autobots are just as bad, and yet they claim they are doing what is best for both their own race and for humanity. All of this, in a franchise based on a kids toy. Thanks for nothing, Michael Bay.

I was thinking that as I was writing it. I enjoy the TF movies for what they are, but I've never rewatched or felt the need to revisit them. I enjoy the robots doing stuff, but it's not something that sticks. Pacific Rim however...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

i just wanna know why they're suddenly all using bladed weapons when it was established why the sword was a last resort in the first film

 

The first film pretty much established that the sword was op. I can see why the engineers said "screw it" and just put them on all the Jaegers. Also, technology has apparently advanced a lot in the ten years between the films. This might be a mild spoiler:

I head a rumor that the Jaeger pilots don't need to drift anymore.

 

Link to comment

The Jaegers look too sleek and designed, like later-MCU Iron Man suits.  And they seem way less physical in the way they move, which doesn't sell the scale of things.

Link to comment

 

i just wanna know why they're suddenly all using bladed weapons when it was established why the sword was a last resort in the first film

 

The first film pretty much established that the sword was op.

I hate this metaphor I'm about to use, but the sword seems to me to be OP in the same way that the A-Bomb was; sure it'd kill your enemy dead, but you're not exactly leaving behind sunshine and rainbows.

Link to comment

This isn't the first comment I've read from a fan of the first film expressing disappoint over the trailer. I have chosen to avoid the trailer to go into the movie with fresh eyes so I'm not seeing what ya'll are seeing, but I hope you're all wrong, or that this trailer isn't representative of the film.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...