I think the smaller villains look cool, but not enough to justify the high price tag. And the Phantom guy just reminds me of Hewkii. Really.
Edited by fishers64, Oct 19 2011 - 05:39 PM.
Posted Oct 19 2011 - 05:32 PM
Edited by fishers64, Oct 19 2011 - 05:39 PM.
Posted Oct 19 2011 - 07:27 PM
Posted Oct 19 2011 - 08:43 PM
I don't see why people dislike Thornraxx's color scheme so much. It's a pretty normal color scheme from my perspective: a primary color, a contrasting secondary color, and a couple neutral colors. The only thing arguably throwing it off is the transparent red of his eyes and tail. For the most part, it's as cohesive as most of the Visorak color schemes.
The villains are much cooler (on so many levels) this time. Well, ignoring Black Phantom (who's cool, but uncreative and not anything special) and Splitface (whose only reason for existing is the Two-Face gimmick).
The colors!
The creative design!
The cohesive appearance! (Well, other than Thornraxx's color scheme)
The rare parts!
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 02:09 PM
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 03:46 PM
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 04:02 PM
The stated release date on some online stores is January, so yes, they should be out by Christmas (sets tend to begin showing up at least a month before their stated release dates). Can't say for sure if that applies for all stores, though.I actually think Toxic Reapa looks more like Corroder, given the black and green color scheme, along with the pose (though minus the awesomeness of sliding down the side of a building.) Two quick questions before I go:
1: Where was it confirmed they were completely eliminating canisters?
2: Do we know whether the sets will be seen in stores in time for Christmas? (I know they generally do start appearing around December, but some confirmation would be nice, since I'm going to ask for several of these for Christmas.)
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 04:05 PM

Posted Oct 20 2011 - 04:06 PM
Ah, good. I was wondering whether they would be out for Christmas. And what do you mean "retailers catalogs"? What catalogs?The stated release date on some online stores is January, so yes, they should be out by Christmas (sets tend to begin showing up at least a month before their stated release dates). Can't say for sure if that applies for all stores, though.
I actually think Toxic Reapa looks more like Corroder, given the black and green color scheme, along with the pose (though minus the awesomeness of sliding down the side of a building.) Two quick questions before I go:
1: Where was it confirmed they were completely eliminating canisters?
2: Do we know whether the sets will be seen in stores in time for Christmas? (I know they generally do start appearing around December, but some confirmation would be nice, since I'm going to ask for several of these for Christmas.)
The thing about canisters being eliminated comes from the retailers' catalogs. Not sure if I should say more because those are technically confidential-- is discussion on that information still forbidden, or does it not matter now that the actual images of the sets have been divulged?
http://www.mocpages.com/home.php/67904 < My Mocpages! ![]()
My first (and currently ONLY) MOC on BZP! > http://www.bzpower.c...?showtopic=5426
PLAGUE

Avatar pic taken [and edited] by me. DON"T STEAL IT! ![]()
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 06:03 PM
you really need to work on your naming... TERIDAX??? are you serious? Twoface? Jaws? I don't even...Teridax's Thornax launcher is either light grey or pearl grey, not silver. The extra joint on the shoulder looks a bit superfluous, IMO. In the Rocka image in the background, it's obvious that the Y-joint tip protrudes from the hex-shield, which is a pity. The lowness of Teridax's chest makes me sad.
Breez has an old foot on her back as armor, and Two-Face (as well as, possibly, Rocka) has a new foot on his back as armor.
Iron-grey feet are nice. I'll probably do some part exchange with Evo 2.0 for Evo 4.0, though.
Thornraxx has one of those waspix connector bits, he looks like an interesting build. He is so going to sell well.
Only sockets and lower arms in azure, though, which is a pity.
Reapa's chest design looks potentially bad.
Jaws looks like a good source of parts.
I can say with almost complete confidence that the chest patterns are stickers, which is good, because I'd sort of like 2.0 armor on top of a 4.0 chest, which would be hard to do well with patterned chests. If Two-Face has stickers and not printing, that would be optimal for this endeavour. And a pain in the burro for anybody not wanting to do that.

Posted Oct 20 2011 - 06:33 PM
Well, Black Phantom looks like Teridax to me, and Two-Face and Jaws are kind of obvious.you really need to work on your naming... TERIDAX??? are you serious? Twoface? Jaws? I don't even...
Teridax's Thornax launcher is either light grey or pearl grey, not silver. The extra joint on the shoulder looks a bit superfluous, IMO. In the Rocka image in the background, it's obvious that the Y-joint tip protrudes from the hex-shield, which is a pity. The lowness of Teridax's chest makes me sad.
Breez has an old foot on her back as armor, and Two-Face (as well as, possibly, Rocka) has a new foot on his back as armor.
Iron-grey feet are nice. I'll probably do some part exchange with Evo 2.0 for Evo 4.0, though.
Thornraxx has one of those waspix connector bits, he looks like an interesting build. He is so going to sell well.
Only sockets and lower arms in azure, though, which is a pity.
Reapa's chest design looks potentially bad.
Jaws looks like a good source of parts.
I can say with almost complete confidence that the chest patterns are stickers, which is good, because I'd sort of like 2.0 armor on top of a 4.0 chest, which would be hard to do well with patterned chests. If Two-Face has stickers and not printing, that would be optimal for this endeavour. And a pain in the burro for anybody not wanting to do that.
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 06:45 PM
Retailers' catalogs are catalogs provided to retail stores by LEGO so they can decide which sets and themes they plan to carry. Retailers' catalogs are thus released before the sets are actually revealed to the general public, and often don't even have finalized pics of the sets inside them, but they don't usually need to-- the pics are only there so that, for instance, a toy store owner can decide how many Ninjago spinners they want to order for their store.Ah, good. I was wondering whether they would be out for Christmas. And what do you mean "retailers catalogs"? What catalogs?
The stated release date on some online stores is January, so yes, they should be out by Christmas (sets tend to begin showing up at least a month before their stated release dates). Can't say for sure if that applies for all stores, though.
I actually think Toxic Reapa looks more like Corroder, given the black and green color scheme, along with the pose (though minus the awesomeness of sliding down the side of a building.) Two quick questions before I go:
1: Where was it confirmed they were completely eliminating canisters?
2: Do we know whether the sets will be seen in stores in time for Christmas? (I know they generally do start appearing around December, but some confirmation would be nice, since I'm going to ask for several of these for Christmas.)
The thing about canisters being eliminated comes from the retailers' catalogs. Not sure if I should say more because those are technically confidential-- is discussion on that information still forbidden, or does it not matter now that the actual images of the sets have been divulged?
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 06:58 PM
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 07:00 PM
"I have seen my dreams laid out before me, then taken away just as quickly."
"I have been shown fear in a handful of dust."
Chapter four - Desire
Coming soon!
Short Stories: The Commute ~ Rasinov ~ In Your Absence ~ Hunter's Game ~ Suchia (Coming soon)
Epics: The Best Kept Secrets (Chapter 27: The Shadow Walker coming soon) ~ The Shadow of this Red Rock
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 11:15 PM
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 11:29 PM
Black Phantom is buy-worthy for syre. The armored him far better than the prelim.
Also, I'm wondering why most of the heroes are $13 now. The whole "more" pieces thing?
Yes, they're more expensive because they have more pieces and larger pieces. They're all fully armored (contrast 2.0 and 3.0 heroes, especially Bulk), have longer limb pieces, armor in new places (e.g. Breez's Samus armor and back armor), and have more weapons. Also, Furno has a propeller pack.
The "sarcasm quotes" imply you believe they're the same size, which they aren't.
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 11:31 PM
Black Phantom is buy-worthy for syre. The armored him far better than the prelim.
Also, I'm wondering why most of the heroes are $13 now. The whole "more" pieces thing?
Yes, they're more expensive because they have more pieces and larger pieces. They're all fully armored (contrast 2.0 and 3.0 heroes, especially Bulk), have longer limb pieces, armor in new places (e.g. Breez's Samus armor and back armor), and have more weapons. Also, Furno has a propeller pack.
The "sarcasm quotes" imply you believe they're the same size, which they aren't.
It wasn't being sarcastic, it's just I was referring to a subject in which I didn't really know how to explain or well... refer to.
But what I thought was that they'd stay the same as they were trying to reduce packaging, and the fact that 2.0 and 3.0s had double the 1.0 piece amount for the same cost too.
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 11:40 PM
Posted Oct 20 2011 - 11:47 PM
Actually, research tends to show that the smaller sets get purchased more, because of their lower price tags (generally called "impulse sets"), which is why the Heroes are the small sets; easier to market them. But the division they have here is nice. Half small sets, four bigger sets, and one box set.
Black Phantom is buy-worthy for syre. The armored him far better than the prelim.
Also, I'm wondering why most of the heroes are $13 now. The whole "more" pieces thing?
Yes, they're more expensive because they have more pieces and larger pieces. They're all fully armored (contrast 2.0 and 3.0 heroes, especially Bulk), have longer limb pieces, armor in new places (e.g. Breez's Samus armor and back armor), and have more weapons. Also, Furno has a propeller pack.
The "sarcasm quotes" imply you believe they're the same size, which they aren't.
It wasn't being sarcastic, it's just I was referring to a subject in which I didn't really know how to explain or well... refer to.
But what I thought was that they'd stay the same as they were trying to reduce packaging, and the fact that 2.0 and 3.0s had double the 1.0 piece amount for the same cost too.
Maybe they would have, but they have about as many pieces as the small boxed villains of 2012, so a smaller price wouldn't really make sense.
And also, having 8 of the 10 sets be $8 would probably not be very profitable.

Posted Oct 20 2011 - 11:57 PM
Posted Oct 21 2011 - 07:59 AM
Another reason for the higher costs of Furno, Breez, Rocka, and Splitface is that they're just bigger than the other sets (besides, of course, Black Phantom). Not too much bigger, but their legs are longer in the very least, and the three larger Heroes are more heavily-outfitted with various gear than their smaller teammates.
Black Phantom is buy-worthy for syre. The armored him far better than the prelim.
Also, I'm wondering why most of the heroes are $13 now. The whole "more" pieces thing?
Yes, they're more expensive because they have more pieces and larger pieces. They're all fully armored (contrast 2.0 and 3.0 heroes, especially Bulk), have longer limb pieces, armor in new places (e.g. Breez's Samus armor and back armor), and have more weapons. Also, Furno has a propeller pack.
The "sarcasm quotes" imply you believe they're the same size, which they aren't.
It wasn't being sarcastic, it's just I was referring to a subject in which I didn't really know how to explain or well... refer to.
But what I thought was that they'd stay the same as they were trying to reduce packaging, and the fact that 2.0 and 3.0s had double the 1.0 piece amount for the same cost too.
Posted Oct 21 2011 - 04:04 PM
Posted Oct 21 2011 - 04:12 PM
Posted Oct 21 2011 - 07:04 PM
Posted Oct 21 2011 - 09:04 PM
I personally despise this idea of size categorizing prices. I mean really, are rocka, furno, and breez THAT different from the others? It's like saying some heroes are better than others. Same with the villains, though I'm happy the good sets (IMO) are in the small category.What do you mean "high price tag"? In the next wave it doesn't work like that.
From what I've seen, there will be three sizes of sets. First, small sets, consisting of Surge, Evo, Toxic Reapa, Thornraxx, and Jawblade. Next, medium-sized sets, consisting of Furno, Breez, Rocka, and Splitface. And then Black Phantom, who I believe is the only large boxed set.
"Attention all planets of the Solar Federation,"

"We have assumed control."
Posted Oct 21 2011 - 09:08 PM
No, but the designers might have wanted a bit more freedom to add more parts than usual on certain heroes. The sizes aren't all that different (only a little more so than Toa Metru height differences) but Furno, Rocka, and Breez have more equipment than the smaller ones.I personally despise this idea of size categorizing prices. I mean really, are rocka, furno, and breez THAT different from the others? It's like saying some heroes are better than others. Same with the villains, though I'm happy the good sets (IMO) are in the small category.
What do you mean "high price tag"? In the next wave it doesn't work like that.
From what I've seen, there will be three sizes of sets. First, small sets, consisting of Surge, Evo, Toxic Reapa, Thornraxx, and Jawblade. Next, medium-sized sets, consisting of Furno, Breez, Rocka, and Splitface. And then Black Phantom, who I believe is the only large boxed set.
Posted Oct 21 2011 - 09:42 PM
Surge and Evo have shorter forearms (which helps rectify the gorilla arm syndrome of BIONICLE that people complained about), but the torsos and such are the same, so it becomes a little awkward somewhere, but I think it's well pulled off overall.No, but the designers might have wanted a bit more freedom to add more parts than usual on certain heroes. The sizes aren't all that different (only a little more so than Toa Metru height differences) but Furno, Rocka, and Breez have more equipment than the smaller ones.
I personally despise this idea of size categorizing prices. I mean really, are rocka, furno, and breez THAT different from the others? It's like saying some heroes are better than others. Same with the villains, though I'm happy the good sets (IMO) are in the small category.
What do you mean "high price tag"? In the next wave it doesn't work like that.
From what I've seen, there will be three sizes of sets. First, small sets, consisting of Surge, Evo, Toxic Reapa, Thornraxx, and Jawblade. Next, medium-sized sets, consisting of Furno, Breez, Rocka, and Splitface. And then Black Phantom, who I believe is the only large boxed set.
I personally like the size differences; it makes the sets less uniform. What I don't like is that all of the size differences seem to be achieved by changing the length of the legs, thus possibly harming the proportions, but that's a different matter.
Surge is in this wave. I think he was more expressing disbelief at his looks. I actually like his color scheme, although the lime green does threaten to overwhelm it at times.They don't release every hero in each wave.
Looks interesting.
Rocka looks awesome, but what happened to Surge?!

Posted Oct 21 2011 - 09:48 PM
My old Username: StarsFanatic866
Ny new username broken down:
Ultimate: due to my old name on a ben 10 website "Ultimate Swampfire"
Stars: due to my old username here on BZPower
Saber: due to my old username on a transformers fan site "Saberfrost"
Bee 823: Due to my username on several websites "bumblebee823"
Posted Oct 21 2011 - 10:29 PM
As far as I can tell, you're the one starting a rumor about a "5.0" line =P. I have yet to hear about such a thing, and I don't think it exists just yet. Obviously we'll get some leaked info for that relatively soonish (Toyfair is in February, after all), but the winter line is generally out by the time we hear of anything.Hey these sets are decent, but I'm waiting for the rumored 5.0 line, I'm very excited for that!
So I guess tihs is a like 3.5 hero line?

Posted Oct 21 2011 - 11:00 PM
Oh. I didn't really pay attention to the size change. Alright then.Another reason for the higher costs of Furno, Breez, Rocka, and Splitface is that they're just bigger than the other sets (besides, of course, Black Phantom). Not too much bigger, but their legs are longer in the very least, and the three larger Heroes are more heavily-outfitted with various gear than their smaller teammates.
Black Phantom is buy-worthy for syre. The armored him far better than the prelim.
Also, I'm wondering why most of the heroes are $13 now. The whole "more" pieces thing?
Yes, they're more expensive because they have more pieces and larger pieces. They're all fully armored (contrast 2.0 and 3.0 heroes, especially Bulk), have longer limb pieces, armor in new places (e.g. Breez's Samus armor and back armor), and have more weapons. Also, Furno has a propeller pack.
The "sarcasm quotes" imply you believe they're the same size, which they aren't.
It wasn't being sarcastic, it's just I was referring to a subject in which I didn't really know how to explain or well... refer to.
But what I thought was that they'd stay the same as they were trying to reduce packaging, and the fact that 2.0 and 3.0s had double the 1.0 piece amount for the same cost too.
Posted Oct 22 2011 - 08:14 AM

Posted Oct 22 2011 - 09:18 AM
Yeah, I'm glad that it isn't 4.0 from what we can tell. It would get WAY too repetitive.As far as I can tell, you're the one starting a rumor about a "5.0" line =P. I have yet to hear about such a thing, and I don't think it exists just yet. Obviously we'll get some leaked info for that relatively soonish (Toyfair is in February, after all), but the winter line is generally out by the time we hear of anything.
Hey these sets are decent, but I'm waiting for the rumored 5.0 line, I'm very excited for that!
So I guess tihs is a like 3.5 hero line?
This could be considered "4.0" (no reason to call it "3.5"), but the line is thematically known as "Breakout", and the Heroes don't actually have 4.0 on the end of their names, which is a big plus for me. I was really on the fence about how they could keep churning numbered Heroes out, but they changed it up, and this looks to be one of my favorite waves.
Posted Oct 22 2011 - 10:48 AM
Posted Oct 22 2011 - 11:50 AM
Oh PLEASE NO 5.0. Go ahead, I'd love a next wave, but the name 5.0 would ruin it. This wave isn't even called 4.0 (and thank heavens too). And the 3.5 thing sounds a bit ridiculous tbh. If it was 3.5, I would expect some trace of their animal side.Hey these sets are decent, but I'm waiting for the rumored 5.0 line, I'm very excited for that!
So I guess tihs is a like 3.5 hero line?
"Attention all planets of the Solar Federation,"

"We have assumed control."
Posted Oct 22 2011 - 12:15 PM

Posted Oct 22 2011 - 02:45 PM
Edited by Cirkit8, Oct 23 2011 - 11:53 AM.
Posted Oct 22 2011 - 05:32 PM
LATEST BBC MOCS: Teal Wheelie, Sir Vamprah, LMBA, Akamai
LATEST SBC MOCS: Blue Hawk, Royal Dragon, Machines of War, Dragon Fire
EPIC> When The Month Ends <EPIC
Credit to Shattered Mask Productions for the Avatar and signoff!
Posted Oct 22 2011 - 06:20 PM
My only complaint is that, build-wise, there was no difference between 2 and 3.0. And, I'm assuming only Alpha Team got the animal upgrade, so since it was exclusive to them, it doesn't seem like it should be considered an upgrade (unless I'm mistaken and the whole Factory got the animal upgrade).I think too many people expect some sort of pattern among numbered versions-- for instance, each time a version goes up in number, it has to have the same amount of changes to the Hero build. I don't think that really makes sense overall. Consider that between LEGO Digital Designer 2.0 and 3.0, the data structure of LXF files changed entirely. But between LDD 3.0 and 4.0, the changes were much more subtle (even though the interface was still improved).

Posted Oct 22 2011 - 06:25 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users