Next RPG Contest
Posted Nov 19 2013 - 11:53 AM
Posted Nov 19 2013 - 04:17 PM
January, May, September, sounds good to me. What with the BZPRPG reboot and all, it's not like we're desperately in need of new player-run RPGs this very instant. And, after all, City of Legends and Era seem to have a bit of life left in 'em. I'm sure their respective GMs wouldn't mind a bit of extra run time.
Posted Nov 19 2013 - 06:20 PM
Posted Nov 19 2013 - 06:24 PM
I think it's a good idea to wait until january.
Just my cent.
Steam name: Ehksidian
Posted Nov 19 2013 - 06:26 PM
Personally I would prefer a January, May, September setup. However, that still leaves the rather irking question of what to do with December (although it might not hurt to just let what RPGs there are run through the month).
Posted Nov 20 2013 - 10:27 PM
As far as which month the contest takes place in, I'd honestly prefer December-April-August because it means the "first set" each year begins in January; having the contest itself in January would mean having it start up in February... which would be a bit odd.
Still... having a contest in May would benefit my timing more than having one in April... so I'll bite. Contest in January, then.
Give the current GMs some time too, eh?
-Toa Levacius Zehvor
"I disapprove of what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (often attributed to Voltaire)
Posted Nov 28 2013 - 04:43 PM
January-May-September works. The only downside is that means the RPG's won't actually start until February, June, and October. That feels a little off, but I'm sure we'll get used to it. Sounds good to me.
Posted Dec 08 2013 - 05:05 PM
January-May-September sounds best. That'll give the RPGs more time to...well, resurrect.
Posted Dec 27 2013 - 10:04 PM
I needed this reminder. I've been wanting to get an entry in at least one contest. Personally, January would be fine for me, and all the other month dates don't leave slash marks in my calendar.
0 user(s) are browsing this forum
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users