Lugia
May 3 2003, 04:15 PM
If the kraata evolve into the rahkishi,then why can you still see them?It's like they just hopped on to a rahkshi body and started controlling it.What do you think?Post your theories/answers here.
~Makaru~
May 3 2003, 04:18 PM
I think the entire rahkshi squirts out from under them, therefore retaining the Kraataed figure.
Remember, the Rahkshi are evolved kraata
Alec
May 3 2003, 05:19 PM
Simple, if you put a kraata in protodermis, it will want some soap j/k it will become a rahkshi
If you put a kraata in a rahkshi, then it will give the rahkshi power.
~Makaru~
May 3 2003, 05:25 PM
| QUOTE (The Cat In The Hat @ May 3 2003, 05:19 PM) |
| If you put a kraata in a rahkshi, then it will give the rahkshi power. |
Does that mean a Rahkshi consists of 2 kraata?
SilverAkaku
May 3 2003, 05:26 PM
I think what your asking is why there still is a kraata if the rahkshi are evolved rahkshi. My answer is: the process kills the kraata, like keratinization kills skin cells. THen, another kraata has to occupy it.
~Makaru~
May 3 2003, 05:28 PM
And silver Akaku solve the mistery. Jinkies!
Asakhe
May 3 2003, 05:40 PM
maybe the Lego Copany just wanted to have the Kraata on the back for no reason, or maybe they wanted to show you the Rahkshi's first form,
Lupus Black
May 3 2003, 05:43 PM
Hm...
I suppose it could be like a Kangaroo, but with an unnatural evolution aspect.
IE... Kraata evolves into Rahkshi, incubates other Kraata so they get stronger.
Would also be mutually beneficial - The Kraata is protected, and the Rahkshi somehow gain strength from the Kraata within.
~Makaru~
May 3 2003, 05:53 PM
Rahkshi, the power Kangaroo. I like it. I bet they can hop far
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.