Jump to content
  • entries
    267
  • comments
    839
  • views
    171,710

Favorite Superheroes Part One


LewaLew

1,171 views

As this Avengers thingy comes up, it gets me thinking idly of comic book superheroes. I never bought a comic book, and probably never will. But I did watch the DCAU, and several superhero movies, and I have read the histories of various characters online. So I decided to make a list of my favorites.

 

1) Shazam/Captain Marvel -- I've always liked the Golden Age heroes better than the gritty modern-day versions. Sure, the new age of grim and violent comics for teenagers have its merits, but it detracts from what superheroes are supposed to be. As far as I can see, the only four who retain this for the most part are Superman, Spider-Man, Captain America, and Captain Marvel. Nonetheless, Captain Marvel, (or rather now, Shazam) has become my favorite largely because he is almost a personification of 1940's superhero comic book characters. He's a kid who shouts "SHAZAM!" and gains the wisdom of Solomon, strength of Hercules, stamina of Atlas, power of Zeus, courage of Achilles, and speed of Mercury and as an added bonus, instantly grows up. If Spider-Man was an interesting hero as a teenage webslinger, the simple concept of Billy Batson spending his time after school as Shazam is even more attention-grabbing. But what I like most about Earth's Mightiest Mortal is that while people continually try to adapt Superman to be darker (which you can't really do with the character without ruining him), Captain Marvel has remained the boyish magical counterpart to Superman. Unfortunately, the reinterpretation of Billy Batson after that New 52 reboot thingy seems to be trying to do the same with the new hero, Shazam.

 

2) Spider-Man -- Before watching Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2, I had never really seen any superhero entertainment outside of the Batman animated series, which I didn't understand at the time. As a result, Superman and Batman were my favorites. But after watching those movies on TV at my aunt's house, Spider-Man was automatically my favorite until I rewatched the DCAU years later. Spider-Man actually isn't all that interesting of a hero, when you look at it. Put him next to Superman, Wonder Woman, the Hulk, and Thor, and you see why Spider-Man sticks to saving NYC rather than the world, Peter Parker and his struggles with being Spider-Man is what makes the webslinger interesting. Spider-Man 3 was a big letdown though. Hoping The Amazing Spider-Man proves to follow the original two rather than the finale.

 

3/4) Batman/Superman -- In this case, it depends on what you're looking at. If it's the DCAU or cinema, Batman is my 3rd place choice, but anywhere else, the Man of Tomorrow takes that spot, primarily because the comic book Batman is just too dark for my tastes. Everything is gruesome and hopeless, while in the DCAU, there's a healthy balance added. DCAU Batman does find some levity, and is still pure hero rather than sitting on the line between hero and antihero. (Primarily because of his no-killing rule. The gruesome villains don't help either.) Superman, on the other hand, is still fighting for truth, justice, and the American way at all times, and while that makes him somewhat bland in comparison, I find it somewhat refreshing when you've got so many like Batman and Wolverine. (One way you could make Superman darker is to play him in a similar way to his behavior pre-Cadmus in Justice League Unlimited, making him lean more towards the un-American way, but for American motives without him realizing it.)

 

5) Captain America -- This is easy. Cap is essentially a young Uncle Sam, with peak human abilities and a shield. One thing I do find odd about him is how Jack Kirby always drew him sorta' hunchbacked. Nonetheless, Captain America is my favorite Avenger, and coincidentally, I liked his movie best of the Marvel Cinematic Universe as well.

 

As a side note, though I like DC better, one thing I like about Marvel are the titles. Not just Spider-Man, The Amazing Spider-Man. Not just The Hulk. The Incredible Hulk. Then there's also The Invincible Iron Man, The Uncanny X-Men, and The Mighty Thor. Speaking of which, why is Captain America just plain ol' Captain America?

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

one of my friends was trying to tell me that Aquaman was the best superhero ever, and he was like, "name someone that could beat aquaman in a fight!"

 

I practically screamed "ANYONE"

 

but I've always liked either Hulk or Wolverine best, even though I don't dislike really any superhero (except aquaman :P )

Link to comment
one of my friends was trying to tell me that Aquaman was the best superhero ever, and he was like, "name someone that could beat aquaman in a fight!"

 

I practically screamed "ANYONE"

Dude. Aquaman commands the creatures of the deep. That includes these dudes:

kraken1.jpg

250px-Destruction_of_Leviathan.png

 

And, my personal favorite,

 

cthulhu_caves.gif

(the Kraken, the Leviathan, and Cthulhu, for those not in the know.)

Link to comment

Aquaman's main problem is that he lets the animals do the work for him. Superman's powers are at least cool. But Aquaman has a bigger problem adapting to the audience.

 

Lemme' see. Superman can clobber anyone except Doomsday, Darkseid, Thor, and the Hulk. Batman can beat anyone by looking at them and growling. Wonder Woman is essentially a female Superman. Green Lantern can use his ring to pull Aquaman out of the water, where he's even more useless. The Flash is just to fast for any sea critter to catch. (Speaking of which, why does the Flash even bother fighting. He's too fast for opponents to even see. He should be able to beat the tar out of anyone who's not equally fast or invulnurable without being touched.) He can probably beat Green Arrow. Martian Manhunter is pretty much equal to Superman. Spider-Man might have some trouble with him. Wolverine would tear him up. The Hulk smashes everybody. Thor smashes everybody too. Captain America may have trouble, until he has a US Naval ship lauch some depth charges. Iron Man probably has a submersible suit that he could clobber Aquaman with. For crying out loud, half the Teen Titans could probably beat him on their own.

 

Yeah, Aquaman is about half as useless as a dead goldfish.

Link to comment

Yeah, but again, CTHULHU.

 

In all honesty, almost nobody there would actually fight Aquaman anyway, but assuming the dragon-octopus-god from R'lyeh exists in the DC universe, Aquaman can drive anyone he wants functionally mad.

 

He's no good out of the water, or without animals, no. But you don't judge Captain America on his theoretical physics skills or Green Lantern on his immunities to bananas. If we're going to play to the strengths of everyone who isn't Aquaman, give the fishboy a fighting chance.

Link to comment

Cthulhu is far more likely to control Aquaman, rather than the other way around. If looking at the critter makes you mad, can you imagine making telepathic contact?

 

And that yellow weakness thing has been reduced greatly over the years. Even so, that means that versus Aquaman, the only thing a GL couldn't do is pull his hair. Aquaman gets more limited the more you take away his home field advantage. All those other guys keep their strengths no matter where they are. Except Spider-Man. If he's not in a city, he'll have a hard time swinging from skyscrapers. Green Arrow is pretty useless underwater though, Hard to shoot arrows underwater.

Link to comment

Okay, so let's rule out the Lovecraftian horrors. That still leaves god knows how many abominations in the oceans.

 

As for nuts weaknesses, how about the other one Hal, at the least had? Wood.

 

But yeah, take Aquaman out of the water (~75% of Earth, there.) and he's less useful than he would be in his home element. But it's still not exactly fair to limit someone to only where they're not at their prime.

 

(never thought I'd see the day I was defending Aquaman.)

Link to comment

Most of the ocean's more monstrous critters have to stay too deep to be useful. Though a whale can do a lot of damage easy, but then again, it has to stay in the water.

 

And just cuz a weakness was silly never stopped it's use from being rampant. (See kryptonite)

 

So Aquaman could beat Superman if he had some kryptonite. But that's something anyone could do. (Wasn't kryptonite supposed to be uper-rare originally?)

 

Point is, Aquaman's weakness (being a fish out of water) is one that makes him useless against any supervillain that doesn't decide to stay underwater. Kryptonite, yellow objects, and wood are pretty easy to avoid, or overcome, Land is not. This makes Aquaman useless against nearly all landlubbing crime.

Link to comment

Until we get more Sharktopodes in everything. Then nobody will stand in his way.

 

Until that day, though, ludicrously contrived circumstances to cause usefulness will have to suffice.

Link to comment

All these things you post pictures of look more like what Aquaman would fight. And would clobber.

 

What they need to do is make him something like a Toa, so that he can not just control, but create water.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...