Oh, man, you're trying to get psychology on me. Let's pretend you've managed to do that. First of all: I clearly understand that there're people with absolutely different interests. Secondly, I do not lack understanding, and subsequently I am not annoyed with it. For the things we do not know in Bionicle I have a huge headcanon developed as many other people do. And I do love read other people thoughts about their own ideas and theories – many had very little in common with my own concept, still they were interesting to me. But that does not mean I would agree with any of them. Even when fans try to explain something they don't know about, there is always some field of freedom. You should know it. And this 'field' is defined by the original 'canon' mythology... well, maybe I should call it "direction of canon mythology"? >_< Sorry again, can’t find the right term. Thirdly… summing up said before I think you definitely didn’t get what I meant, so if you don’t mind I’ll skip your words about "process of discovery" and repeating "lack of understanding". I have little problem with that. Well, it does make sense since it's the same thing which makes fantasy characters see visions. And so it depreciates calling it a "glitch". WHAT. I'm sorry again and again -- I did not say anything like this. What I was saying is that I do not want them being explained scientifically. And this is actually the thing I don't like here on BZP in last few years. Sometimes you're going too far in technology and science, as if forgetting Bionicle original unity of both technology and natural/unnatural powers. I can say that in general you are right. I can try to explain my sudden heart-cry: What does annoy me (and makes me unhappy, ho-ho) is quantity of theories written in "omg-this-is-cool-and-we-should-make-it-happen" mood. Maybe they are greatly developed but that doesn't make them good. And I'm a bit afraid that when (or "if") Greg would return to continue Bionicle storyline, another bunch of -- I'm sorry -- stupid ideas again will get into canon. There're enough of them already. And that why I'm very frustrated while reading another one "techno" theory. A lot of same themed ideas IS NOT interesting. Of course not. But that does not mean at all that all their powers should be technologically invented. Oh, he actually did it? Heck. Greg also made up that awful mind-blowing Red Star revelation. So as far as sci-fi goes... situation is getting worse. Almost forgot: some time ago I wanted to share with you my vision/theory of energized protodermis, that likes to watch and play with these funny little creatures of nature, being the entity of High Consciousness/god/a Creator, something that lies between or at the edges of reality(ies), and it's "liquid" form being a projection dripping through the chasm of reality. But I guess, now it's just meaningless. So. Now I free you from my negative IMHO, just hoping for your answer on some of my thesis.