So you're saying LEGO should make up for two sets that feel like repeats of stuff we've had before with… a repeat of something else we've had before? I can definitely understand being underwhelmed by two repetitive UCS sets in a row, but I don't see how a third would solve that. I do not have a problem with AoH being a combination of many of sets previously released before. My problem with AoH is that it is not worthy of the UCS label. It has a lot of design flaws. It is visually disappointing. It is not even a proper Assault. In my opinion, it is embarrassing next to Ewok Village which isn't technically a UCS set but might as well be. As for the Death Star, it was out for the last 8 years, retired about 8 months ago and then re-released. As far as I am aware, the Falcon did not come out at the peak of Star War's Lego popularity and at a time when there were far less expensive sets compared to now. Considering it came out around the time of the great recession, people didn't have $500 to blow on a UCS set and didn't sell well. It was also only available for a couple of years. So many people missed out on it (myself included) - something which is highlighted by its ridiculous secondary market value. It would sell like wildfire and Lego know it.