I've never supported gender-exclusive LEGO lines and likely never will; it isn't even that this isn't a solid idea (which in fact it is, with a complex story that is uncommon in stuff marketed at girls). However, I doubt that, even with a highly-executed story and all sorts of complex sets, it would succeed.Why? It all hinges on LEGO bringing in an entirely new market, because the old one (7-13 year old males) would have at least a significant portion alienated. You basically have to bring in enough new fans to A) make up for any loss in market (which would be significant) with an influx of new customers and http://www.bzpower.com/board/public/style_emoticons/default/cool.png keep the new fans hooked for a period of time to recoup losses from production and marketing, which would also be significant.As opposed to a typical 'new LEGO line', which can appeal to both the market of the previous line and a new market, any girls line assumes enough female fans will come in to make up for the loss of the male ones. Unless LEGO makes it low-budget and uses little to no promotion, even if the line does pick up sales, it might have to run for a few years in the red before it can make a profit. I'm not an expert, but I'd guess that that would be why most girls-oriented LEGO lines flopped - they either couldn't bring in enough new fans or couldn't make a profit even why they did.Don't get me wrong, this is a nice idea. I just doubt it would work given the marketing aspects and precedent.-Toa Nidhiki05