Jump to content
  • entries
    289
  • comments
    1,046
  • views
    76,978

How Do The Inika Stack Up?


T-Hybrid

412 views

Olda, Nuva, Metru, Hordika, Hagah...

 

Since 2001, we Bionicle fans have been introduced to five generations of heroes. Each with their own quirks, designs, and stories. And now, in 2006, we're introduced to the future of Bionicle: The Inika.

 

But with so many heroes, and so many designs, just where do the Inika fit into the grand history of the toyline? Well, many who have recieved their Inika over the past few weeks have taken to ranking, and though I usually don't like actually trying to rank my favorites of various things (just look over my posts in any "Top #" discussion to see what I'm talking about), I felt it would be a great blogging exercise to actually try and do a Countdown.

 

So, without further ado, I present:

 

Torhu's Toa Countdown

 

#6: The Nuva

If the Nuva had been introduced during the 2006 storyline, it's quite possible they'd have been built just like the Inika we have today. Instead, we saw the classic Olda sets transformed into these armored heros. But why would I rank the Nuva at the bottom, below even the designs they replaced? Because looking back, it was the Nuva that began the trend of reducing the unique elements between canister figures. The Nuva each had the same armor, and essentially identical designs. Yes, we had to suffer through the Bohrok, but it takes a second go to actually begin a trend. And that's why I put the Nuva at the bottom of the Toa hierarchy.

 

#5: The Metru

Holy cow, what a difference time makes! I remember seeing pictures of these and thinking LEGO had done it. They had brought Bionicle into the era of action figures. With articulation at every major joint (except the waist, but I'm not complaining), the Metru were able to stand in every pose I could think up. And with a variety of weapons (including a clever Kanoka launcher/jetpack), the characters promised a new direction in the storyline. However, they were about as identical as two sets could be. Take off the Kanohi and the weapons...and which Toa are you looking at? I had no idea, and it quickly turned me off of the sets.

 

#4: The Hordika

Okay, I have a feeling this one is going to draw some questions. When looking at people's rankings, I usually see the Hordika ranked dead last. I don't see them that way. The Hordika were an interesting experiement from the designers of LEGO. The first (and so far only) Toa to not wear Kanohi, the Hordika also incorporated the gear gimmick into the arm. Combined with the Rhotuka launcher, these were also the first Toa to boast two action features. However, the Hordika once again suffered from the lack of individuality that plauged both the Metru and Nuva. On top of that, the concept of being part-Animal was lost in the details. The Hordika had very mechanical looking feet, and their faces (though unusual) didn't draw any particular animals to mind. But I liked the action features enough to look past the similarities, and the posebility was on par with the Metru. This to me puts them above their predecessors. Well, except for one group.

 

#3: The Olda

With my comments regarding the Metru and Nuva, you must be curious why I'd rank the Olda over either of them. Let alone both... I'll admit when I started writing this, I had the Olda ranked dead last, with the Nuva up in this posistion. But as I wrote my explanations, I came to realize something about the Olda. As it stands, the original Toa were basic figures. Featuring no elbow, knee, or neck articulation, the Olda were more showy then functional. However, the upside of these sets were their indivduality. From Tahu's chest ball and Gali's little blue chest bump to Pohatu's upside-down torso. Every Toa had something unique about their design that helped them stand out when together on a shelf. This made the character's (and figures) memorable. And it's why I place them near the top, above even their evolved form.

 

#2: The Inika

This one took a lot of deliberation in my head before I was able to make an honest choice. I've already written a review of the sets, so hopefully that will help you get a feel for what I think of them on the whole. The Inika are a step back towards individuality that I hope to see continued as the generations of Toa continue to come forth from the LEGO creative team. Each Inika has the same 13 points of articulation that the Metru featured, while also going back to adding unique elements between sets. Nuparu's shoudler-mounted Zamor launcher and Hewkii's chain are the most prevalent. However, the Inika feature two different types of chest armor and two different foot designs. It's a small difference, but each Toa makes use of these pieces to bring their own style to the set. This was something that hadn't been seen in any of the regular Toa releases. It was, however, seen in a pair of very special Toa.

 

#1: The Hagah

Bionicle fans in the US were lucky to get their hands on both of these sets, and it's a shame that the full squad wasn't released. I have heard rumblings about the original intent for these two sets (Norik's resemblance to a certain Turaga of questionable allegiance should be mention enough of this) that explain why this was not the case, but I can't help but feel slighted. The Hagah had it all, poseability, playability, and personality. Using slightly modified Metru designs, the Hagah were also given the Rhotuka shield, which allowed the focus of the set to remain on the figure itself. Meanwhile, the two Toa were given distinct design differences. Iruini wore Metru shoulder pads and a Bohrok claw, while Norik sported a silver Dume chest plate and Nuva shoulder armor. With the clever use of previous sets to fill out the armor, I'm left wondering what LEGO designers could've done if given an opportunity to build the full team. It's this perfect blend of form and function that should earn the Hagah a special place in the collection of any Bionicle fan. And it's why they take home the #1 spot, only in my opinion of course.

 

Though our opinions may differ when it comes to exact rankings, I'm sure one thing can be agreed upon. In the last few years, LEGO has taken big steps in the design of the Toa. With the release of the Inika behind us, and the initial feedback coming through...it's clear that they've struck gold with these new heroes. I can only look at the current generation of Toa and wonder what LEGO has in store for the future years. And I truthfully have no idea what to expect.

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

You make some good points, though I'm not sure the Hagah fit very well in your list. For one thing, they're the only ones in the whole list who aren't a team of Toa, instead being two different members. Keep in mind that they all had spears and shields, meaning it would be kind of dull having all six Toa with the same artillery. It's a bit too specific to review these, while having a broader look on the others. It's like comparing the original Pohatu and Tahu, because every Toa series has had at least two contrasting features. Nothing against the Hagah, though. Iruini's a blast to play with.

 

As before, it's a nice overview of the Toa sets. Sadly, I believe you have a point about the Toa Nuva, although I still found them more fun than the Olda. The dual weapon functions were perfect, and there were much more possibilities to play with. With the Olda, I was almost required to play a type of Rock 'em Sock 'em robots. But with the Nuva, it was easier to role-play a sword fight, give Lewa a voulge, or Tahu a staff, and make it look more like the Toa's element could actually fire accurately. A lot of it was about finding imaginative ways to play with them.

 

Truthfully, the Toa Metru would have been at the bottom of my list. I bought all six, and found I couldn't bear looking at the finished models. The arms were too short, and I couldn't quite imagine using the action feature with some of their weapons (to be fair, I did find some things fun about them. Onewa's weapons and the dual use of Matau's and Vakama's.) In fact, the gear function was awkward. The arms were always slanted, so I could never swipe downward if it made sense to. With the Toa Nuva and Olda, I would simply leave the gear function and manually do a diagonal swipe. With the Metru, there was no way to adjust it. In the end, while there could be some fund factors. The Metru were my least favorite sets.

 

Sorry about my rambling. I hope this doesn't turn into a competion of Toa countdowns.

Link to comment

You make some good points, though I'm not sure the Hagah fit very well in your list. For one thing, they're the only ones in the whole list who aren't a team of Toa, instead being two different members. Keep in mind that they all had spears and shields, meaning it would be kind of dull having all six Toa with the same artillery. It's a bit too specific to review these, while having a broader look on the others. It's like comparing the original Pohatu and Tahu, because every Toa series has had at least two contrasting features.

You bring up an interesting thought. Yes there were only two Hagah, but those two Hagah encompassed the best of both the Metru and the Olda. I was originally going to count them in as Metru (much like Lhikahn), but decided that wouldn't be fair to their designs.

 

Also, their weapons were both spears, however the uniqueness in the rest of the sets made up for the similar weapons. You'll note that I rank the Iniki second despite that they all have very sword-like weapons.

Link to comment

this hierarchy was acurate to my point of view also but i do hope that they will release the rest of the Hagah later on! i got norikk and iruni together for 16$ at walmart.... and im glad i did!

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...