It's gotta be a computer error.

~AA

Fox has been doing the same thing; calling Vermont and Delaware for Obama and West Virginia for McCain, with only Kentucky's flash-applet-thingy actually reporting votes.

Edit: Yeah, this is all fluctuating like crazy. Lurking minute-by-minute seems not to be working well. I leave now to go eat dinner.

Ha! I have a friend from Vermont and I just showed him this.

Lulz.

~Fox

Vermont. Why. WHY do all the voting shenanigans always swirl around Vermont?

LOL, they must have low expectations for voter turnout.

Vermont. Why. WHY do all the voting shenanigans always swirl around Vermont?

It's because we're cool like that.

I saw. Kinda jumping the gun, there. Hope they're right.

I recall residents in poor Sutton county finding their votes for Ron Paul in the primaries amounted to "0".

It's okay though, the numbers were finally rectified.

A year later.

>__<

It's gotta be a computer error.

 

~AA

I wish.

Vermont. Why. WHY do all the voting shenanigans always swirl around Vermont?

It's not shenanigans. News outlets claim victories for candidates at 0% many times. It happened on many occasions during primaries and in the previous 2 elections it happened multiple times. It's their rush to beat out every other news outlet.

I never trust the news; by the time they report on it, everyone already knows. As I like to say, no news is good news, so all news must be bad.

Vermont. Why. WHY do all the voting shenanigans always swirl around Vermont?

It's not shenanigans. News outlets claim victories for candidates at 0% many times. It happened on many occasions during primaries and in the previous 2 elections it happened multiple times. It's their rush to beat out every other news outlet.

I remember those times. And I thought the mess in 2000 was leading networks to do a better job of not actually calling anything until the polls had closed across the country.