Jump to content
  • entries
    594
  • comments
    5,378
  • views
    131,953

12 Comments


Recommended Comments

Too blocky, or square, or whatever.

 

I do, however, like where you're going with the knees.

 

Do you think this is too much system? Or is the torso plenty Technic underneath?

 

The canisters are already there? How big are they? When I first thought canisters I was thinking something almost the entire length of the back, like jet-packs or something.

 

-CF

Link to comment
Too blocky, or square, or whatever.

 

I do, however, like where you're going with the knees.

 

Do you think this is too much system? Or is the torso plenty Technic underneath?

 

The canisters are already there? How big are they? When I first thought canisters I was thinking something almost the entire length of the back, like jet-packs or something.

 

-CF

I know, I know. I'm not all that good at legs.

 

Kneecaps of pokening.

 

The torso, as it is right now, is nearly solid technic other than the armour. It'll be fine.

 

I'll get a back pic at some point. I was thinking positioned more like the smokestacks on this, but side by side.

 

Answers to several comments have been edited into the comments themselves, scroll up.

Link to comment
How are you going to attach canisters to his back.

They're already there.

I was thinking... like actual set canisters, but okay...

Link to comment
How are you going to attach canisters to his back.

They're already there.

I was thinking... like actual set canisters, but okay...

Actual set cans are lame and look absolutely fething retarded on anything within the size requirements.

Link to comment

Yeah, I was thinking actual set canisters (rather, the round ones from '01, '02, '04) but then realized that was silly. Too big and would ruin any color scheme. So I'm looking forward to various interpretations of that requirement.

 

-CF

Link to comment
I know, but I thought the requirements meant actual canisters... yeah...

So does halfninety percent of everyone.

 

The wording ought to be changed to "tanks that look capable of holding liquid or gas". 'twould clear up so much confusion.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...