Jump to content
  • entries
    589
  • comments
    1,767
  • views
    152,399

Aaaggghhh.


Eeko

739 views

AAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. :|

Calculus is literally killing me. Here's what I'm doing.

A square-based, box-shaped shipping crate is designed to have a volume of 16 ft3. The material used to make the base costs twice as much (per ft2) as the material in the sides, and the material used to make the costs half as much (per ft2) as the material in the sides. What are the dimensions of the crate that minimize the cost of the materials.

 

Seriously? Why do they do this to me?

 

Btb, the answer is:

4/(51/3) x 4/(51/3) x 251/3

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

The answer is:

 

Accept that sometimes shipping costs more than you would like it to and go with the simplest design.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...