Jump to content
  • entries
    610
  • comments
    1,306
  • views
    416,273

Of Movies and North Korea


Ta-metru_defender

756 views

Essays, Not Rants! 144: Of Movies and North Korea

 

I have a strange fascination with a certain North Korean dictator. Maybe it’s because he’s barely eight years older than me, hangs out with Dennis Rodman, and tyrannically rules a country of 25 million people with a combination of a cult-of-personality and sheer terror.

 

Like I said, fascinating.

 

So naturally I was really looking forward to The Interview. I had passes to a preview of it on Thursday and was all set. Only, it turns out, North Korea was really mad about it and, a hack and couple terrorist threats later, and it’s been pulled from cinematic distribution. And I’m bummed.

 

Because The Interview is satire and satire is important. Because North Korea is terrifying; for there to be a country that, well, crazy is scary. But that’s the thing: we make fun of what scares us.

 

Satire takes away the teeth. It’s why The Great Dictator exists, why videos about Iraqi loyalists like

exist, and, of course, what makes The Interview funny. But what’s worth noting is that The Interview, like that video about subtitles and terrorists, seemed ready to make as much fun of the ‘good guys.’

 

The comedy of the subtitles video comes not out of how the reporter (and, by extension the media) treats the soldiers, that is her insistent condescension to them. The Interview’s comedy, based on the trailers, looks to stem from the bumbling antics of Seth Rogen and James Franco in a place where they really shouldn’t be. Plus, Kim Jong Un and all of his eccentricities makes for great fodder. Taking the mickey out of him with a movie like that doesn’t diminish his status as a threat, one that everyone is aware of, but reminds us that he’s still human. ‘cuz Supreme Leaders are people too.

 

But now I didn’t get to go to my screening and theater chains won’t be showing it. Granted, there’s some justification in not wanting to incur the wrath of North Korea, but it’s the precedent that’s worrisome. Another film about North Korea in production, Pyongyang, has been canceled for much of the same reason. There’s a weird sort of fear that’s stifling satire and fiction. Which, again, is a shame. Without it we wouldn’t have The Colbert Report taking shots at everything from terrifyingly conservative politicians to, of course, North Korea.

 

Now, there’s a distinction here to be sure. We make fun of the part that scares us, not what saddens us. There’s no comedy about those dying under the Kim regime, just as Jon Stewart couldn’t find anything funny to say in the wake of the grand jury’s decision on Eric Garner. There’s a line between the amusing and the not. Kim Jong Un exists on that line, almost caricature that he is. He’s an easy target, but that doesn’t mean it’s not worth taking the shot.

So I’m of the opinion that The Interview shouldn’t have been canceled. Even if it’s cinematic release has been pulled, then at the very least there should have been plans made for an immediate digital release. It doesn’t make sense for the Hermit Kingdom to be the one calling the shots on what gets released in a different country. If anything, this has also upped the hype for the movie more than an advertising campaign could.

 

Because, hey, what gets a public’s attention more than an international incident?

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

I agree wholeheartedly - cancelling the film and refusing to distribute it in any form is a horrible mistake that should not have been made, and I'm hoping that it will be corrected as soon as possible.

 

Besides, your final point is spot on - releasing the film theatrically can only be good for Sony financially; many more people would see it just to find out what all of the fuss was about.

 

But still, the precedent being set here is extremely worrisome.

Link to comment

I agree with your points.

 

This news led to an interesting discussion with a friend of mine. Before the film was pulled, when theaters were dropping it voluntarily for fear of terrorism, he decried this as cowardice and said that everyone who could should buy two tickets just to show solidarity. I disagreed, because the movie to me seemed to be the sort of crass comedy which, satire or not, was not typically the kind of movie I enjoyed. My friend argued that it was more important to buy tickets on principle, but I argued that if there had been no threats I would have no interest in the movie, and I didn't see altering my behavior to spite terrorists as much more principled than altering my behavior out of fear of them.

 

I'm interested in where you'd stand on that debate. What are your thoughts?

Link to comment

I was always excited about seeing it, and it doesn't make me wanna see it any more but now nobody can talk me out of it :P

I don't mind that it got pulled, whether or not the threat was genuinely threatening (we all know they'd never risk anything, especially over a movie, because the retaliation would be swift and effective) because in the end it was the individual smaller companies just thinking about their customers' safety and I think that's loads more important than making any statement.

Link to comment

I hadn't even heard about it until this whole incident. I kinda want to see it just because of that. I don't even really know what it's about honestly...

Link to comment

Lychir: I've wanted to see it since it was announced, heck, a friend of mine and I made a half-done Asteroids knock-off where you play as Kim Jong Un who fights the Capitalist American Dogs. I'm not a big fan off the idea of buying tickets for the heckuvit, principle or not. I guess if you wanna see it, see it; if you don't, don't.

 

Shockwave: An American talk show host is tasked with killing Kim Jong Un. Hilarity ensues.

Link to comment

I'm not even sure if buying extra tickets is the right way to support the film, as the issues surrounding the (lack of) release are not financial. A better method would have been to contact your local theater and expression your concern over them pulling the film (assuming they were one of the chains who did so). Obviously it's too late do that now, and it probably wouldn't have been very effective in the first place, but it makes more sense than throwing money at Sony.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...