Rant Against The Sig
Today I will make a rant. Yes, I do indeed rant, how surprising it may seem. What is the subject? Why, the banner/ signature misunderstanding!
First of all, how many people have made the mistake of stating "I give credit to ____ for this sig" or something like that? ____ did not give you your sig! He gave you a banner. This is a banner:
This is a sig:
[[Star Wars RPG]]=[[Newbie Q&A]]=[[The Bones Blog]]=[[Respectablity]]=[[Staff History Topic]]
[[Inevitability]]=[[An Insidious Demise]]=[[Bionicle Paracosmos]]=[[TGAoPRPG]]"If I decided you were 'rock', you would be. If I decided you were 'Spiderman', you would be." ~bonesiii O_o
Take note of the fact that the banner is in the sig, not the sig entirely. When you are picking fruit do you say "Dude, thos are alot of stones!" or "Man, you got alot of peaches!"? Using this logic, stating that your 'sig' was made by ____ would be incorrect. But what are the consequences? Well, it bugs the titter out of me, for one thing. True, I have done it, and true, I have not said anything about it, but that all changes now! Yes, now!
I hereby denounce such errors in grammar and vocabulary ans a sacrilige to not oly myself, but also to the board. Yes, the board. The board that gives permission to edit one's signature only by staff and the member himself, and not to any random membe with MSPaint!
Thank you for your time reading this pointless brathering which has as much power as a sandshovel holding the sea back.
I will end this pointless rant with a single word: hulabbaloo.
~EW~
4 Comments
Recommended Comments