Jump to content

blogs_blog_288

  • entries
    587
  • comments
    1,491
  • views
    46,084

Cthulhu And The Movies


GMan

246 views

No, this is not about everybody's favorite down-on-his-luck sociopath Cthulhu the Rage Cannon, but on an issue I have with Hollywood. For, you see, numerous movies have been titled "Cthulhu", which would lead one to believe that the movie featured Cthulhu prominently, or was an adaptation of the H.P. Lovecraft tale from which the deity originates, "The Call of Cthulhu". But, NO. IT'S ALMOST ALWAYS A HORRIFICALLY DISFIGURED VERSION OF 'A Shadow Over Innsmouth', ANOTHER LOVECRAFT STORY. Worse yet, the movies that aren't mistitled adaptations of that story, but still do not feature Cthulhu whatsoever, or take such liberties with the concept that you're left wondering if it's really about breakdancing Swedish pot-head babies come to eat your skulls. This angers me greatly. As a rule of thumb, any movie containing the name 'Cthulhu', however misspelled, should it be 'Ktulu', 'Kathulu', 'Cthulu', and so on, must include this deity, and not in a brief mention coupled with the one small scene featuring the Necronomicon that was edited and stretched for the trailers shown in theaters and on television to attract people who think they know about ficticious occult content. You know what I mean, Hollywood. Evil Dead and its sequels, whilst not Lovecraftian in nature, successfully pulled off the concept of the Necronomicon and its usage in cinema. Such a feat has not yet materialized in mainstream, widely-distributed, or well-funded horror films in recent time. If it is more based on The Shadow Over Innsmouth than The Call of Cthulhu, it should be named 'The Shadow Over Innsmouth', or should that prove too long a title, something along the lines of just 'Innsmouth' would be acceptable. However, if the movie takes extreme liberties with the adaptation of this as well, it should just be retooled into something else, because it has strayed from the vision of the original story and is not true to the spirit or character of Lovecraft's writing. While I applaud the makers of the American film with the title of 'Cthulhu' being released this year for using a gay protagonist, I strongly disagree with the direction of the plot, and the attempted symbolism.

 

Now, give me an adaptation of The Temple, or an actual adaptation of The Call of Cthulhu that doesn't suck, Hollywood, and that would make me happier. Not 'happy', nor 'cheery', and not anything along the lines of 'jovial', but less angry at the film industry for their treatment of Lovecraft's work.

1 Comment


Recommended Comments

There is a 2005 film called The Call of Cthulhu which was made in black and white, and was a silent film. It's been hailed as the closest film adaptation of a Lovecraftian work to date...

 

Now, GMan, I agree with you whole heartedly. I have several films "Based" off of Lovecraftian Works (So far, I have the 1970 version of The Dunwich Horror, The film version of The Lurking fear, Dagon, and The Unnamable), and only one of them is even slightly like the original story it's based off of (That film being Dagon, which is actually, as is repeatedly done, The Shadow Over Innsmouth. It's a classic in my opinion, even though they did change a bit of it.)

 

Luckily, for people like us who want real Lovecraft based movies, there is a film company that's soul purpose is to make Lovecraft based movies that actually stick to the story proper. These are the people responsable for the above mentioned Call of Cthulhu film.

 

So, for the love of everything that is horror and the unknown, Hollywood, MAKE A DECENT LOVECRAFT FILM!

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...