Most of the time, when looking at blog entries about a serious issue that's propped up in BZP life recently, I have no knowledge of how that's sprung up. So, what I can infer from this is that I am not going to the places on BZP where this sort of thing is happening. Therefore, it's in a concentrated area.

Where? I don't know. You tell me.

Come on. This current debate on humour. Where on earth did that start? I saw it in Smeag's blog a couple of days ago, but it must have come from something happening, I'm assuming someone calling someone else a Nazi. My questions are When? Where? How come I don't have a clue what you guys are talking about?

That's why often my views on things are a little bit neutral. Sure, they may swing to one side a bit, but it's mainly because I DON'T KNOW THE FULL FACTS. Where am I leading to with this, I don't know. That's why people can't take me seriously. I'm a loose cannon when provoked. I go off in one direction that people can't understand. I'm ignorant. I'm naive. It's this ignorance that keeps me neutral. Ignorance can be a bliss.

OK, this Blog entry was a complete waste of time. If any of you can work out what I'm talking about, please tell me and everyone else. This has just been a bunch of jumbled up thoughts which I'm not sure are even right. But that's just me. A bunch of jumbled thoughts with no clear message.

Heh, I like that analogy.