Jump to content
  • entries
    1,281
  • comments
    6,627
  • views
    265,062

In Response To Jimmy Page Saying Nobody Was Able To Replace Plant...


Necro

264 views

LOOK HARDER.

 

If Queen could replace Freddie Mercury with Paul Rodgers, Led Zeppelin can find somebody.

10 Comments


Recommended Comments

True. And that was the point of the Paul Rodgers example; if he can replace Freddie Mercury, Jimmy can find someone to replace Plant.

Link to comment
Also, Paul Rodgers didn't replace Freddy.

 

If he did there wouldn't have been the Queen+Paul Rodgers name.

 

Touche. Couldn't Zeppelin do the same thing though? For that matter, why is Plant saying no again?

Link to comment
Also, Paul Rodgers didn't replace Freddy.

 

If he did there wouldn't have been the Queen+Paul Rodgers name.

 

Touche. Couldn't Zeppelin do the same thing though? For that matter, why is Plant saying no again?

 

Because a Led Zeppelin Reunion ruins it.

 

It's like if The Beatles did a reunion without Stu.

Link to comment
Also, Paul Rodgers didn't replace Freddy.

 

If he did there wouldn't have been the Queen+Paul Rodgers name.

 

Touche. Couldn't Zeppelin do the same thing though? For that matter, why is Plant saying no again?

 

Because a Led Zeppelin Reunion ruins it.

 

It's like if The Beatles did a reunion without Stu.

 

Hmm...fair enough, though I'd really love to go see a Zeppelin concert without having to break time or get a time machine...

Link to comment
Also, Paul Rodgers didn't replace Freddy.

 

If he did there wouldn't have been the Queen+Paul Rodgers name.

 

Touche. Couldn't Zeppelin do the same thing though? For that matter, why is Plant saying no again?

 

Because a Led Zeppelin Reunion ruins it.

 

It's like if The Beatles did a reunion without Stu.

 

Hmm...fair enough, though I'd really love to go see a Zeppelin concert without having to break time or get a time machine...

 

Plenty footage on the net and for sale.

Link to comment
Also, Paul Rodgers didn't replace Freddy.

 

If he did there wouldn't have been the Queen+Paul Rodgers name.

 

Touche. Couldn't Zeppelin do the same thing though? For that matter, why is Plant saying no again?

 

Because a Led Zeppelin Reunion ruins it.

 

It's like if The Beatles did a reunion without Stu.

 

Hmm...fair enough, though I'd really love to go see a Zeppelin concert without having to break time or get a time machine...

 

Plenty footage on the net and for sale.

 

It's not the same as actually being there though.

 

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...