Jump to content
  • entries
    1,919
  • comments
    16,140
  • views
    594,581

Not Everything Is A Spoiler


Bfahome

315 views

Spoilers exist. Some people post them. That does not mean that every time someone mentions a possibility or infers a connection that it is a spoiler and should be aggressively condemned.

 

Toward the end of 2008, we heard whispers through a book description of an unknown being named "Glatorian Vastus". Apparently Vastus was a prototype name for Gresh or something (theory is supported by the Wal*Mart receipt error).

 

In early 2009, before names of summer characters were legally known (though had been leaked), some poor member posted a topic in sets asking who this "Glatorian Vastus" he or she had heard about was. The topic was almost immediately swarmed by many members repeatedly saying that discussion of leaked information wasn't allowed, when instead they could just have easily said it wasn't known who he was, or better yet just reported the topic and moved on.

 

I ask you this: Who do you think gave more away?

 

Better yet are the people who pick up on any hint of possible leaked information and pounce on it, berating the member who dared to post such a thing. And when the "offending" member tries to back up and say that what they said wasn't leaked, the "pouncer" will start explaining how what the member had said was leaked, going into much greater detail than the member ever had. I just love that.

 

The same (or similar) is true now, with the identity of the traitor a well-guarded secret hot topic for some members. Some will come right out and say something like "<character> is the traitor!" Some may try to disguise it as a conveniently accurate theory. But remember, not all of these theories are necessarily spoilers.

 

If Background Agori #482 was actually the traitor* and I happened to post a theory stating I thought that he/she was, it does not mean that I know that for sure. It does not mean that I have seen the movie and am just trying to disguise a spoiler as a theory. It does not mean that you need to respond to my post/topic in such a way that will erase any possible doubt. It does mean that you can report the topic or post and let the mods do their job.

 

For example:

I think <character> is the traitor.

Remove that now that's a spoiler!!!!!!

 

That does not help at all. In fact it makes things many times worse, for anyone who hadn't seen the movie, for the topic starter, and definitely for the mods.

 

In summary:

p_report.gif

Use it.

 

t_reply.gif

Lose it.

 

 

 

 

I feel better now.

 

*Just so you know, I have no idea who that is.

16 Comments


Recommended Comments

I want to give you my approval, but I am just way to tired to go get it.

 

But I agree with this entirely. There's not much else for me to really say.

Link to comment

I never trust anything in the background; it's always too suspicious... and background-y. It just never feels right, what with being all negative and everything.

 

©1984-2009 Toaraga EAM

Link to comment
Bfa wins JanPoints.

 

Redeemable at any local Janus Kiosk.

 

<3

 

-Janus

Goodness I love the Janus kiosk. I redeemed so many points at Brickfair.

 

Use them happily, Bfa.

Link to comment

So glad there is another member on this site that actually thinks the same as I

Another thing is people complaining about spoilers that are IN SPOILER TAGS

Doesn't happen often, but it REALLY makes the one doing so seem...well, I can't say

'Tis unfortunate that so many BZPers have the impulse to post instead of report...or think

Link to comment

I know how you feel. Them telling you to stop or put it in spoiler tags is more a confirmation that the spoiler is legit, and ruins it for the rest of us :(

Link to comment
*Just so you know, I have no idea who that is.

 

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Probably one of the many hundred Tarduks/Raanus/Meti.
*Hopes is not too spoiler*

 

I agree with you on your point, but the problem with confirming/denying spoilers is that anything that relates a theory to a spoiler confirms the spoiler, even if you're trying to suggest an alternate theory. Even this blog entry is a spoiler helper, because it only came up because of a spoiler. :wacko:

 

In short, I semi-approve of a group of people who go around theory topics and accuse them of being spoilers to annonymise actual spoilers, or totally back the staff that destroy all evidence of spoilers, including all evidence that hints to a spoiler ever existing, if the topic in question is about an official source.

Link to comment

Glad someone has the guts to say that. I'm getting fed up of ready theories, only for people to say "something in there was right", giving away a massive piece of plot. It's not right, and should be stopped

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...