I think it's actually important to note the dinosaurs we know had feather-like structures that weren't Coelurosaurs, especially those like Kulindadromeus that are ornithischians, thus opening the doors to feathers (at least simple feathers) being basal to all of Dinosauria, which means any dinosaur could conceivably have been at least partially feathered (barring fossil evidence to the contrary, such as skin impressions.) It's like being on the brink of the next Dinosaur Renaissance, one that tears away the perception of the wrinkly, scaly, grey-green elephantine creatures of before and instead explores a large variety of possible integuments and structures and seeks to breath new life into old bones by bringing them even closer to the realm of true understanding. Now that I certainly find strange, as I've been told directly by friends on the staff that discussion of evolution is not prohibited, merely discussion of the false controversy surrounding it. I'd imagine it was the latter that lead to the topic's demise. Perhaps you mean Suchomimus or Baryonyx? Most likely the latter, as of the two, Baryonyx is slightly better-known. Most interestingly, a new study on Spinosaurus found it may have been radically different from its relatives in its level of adaptations to semiaquatic life. Most notably, they found its legs are likely much smaller than predicted based on other spinosaurids. The extent to which they were shortened is something I last saw still being contested, but I'm under the impression it's at least certain the animal's legs were much shorter than previously thought. I am aware of Ornithosuchians with feathers. Such as Psittacaosaurus, and Yes, Kulindadromeous. Of course not all Scientists agree that the structures on Kulindadromeus were real feathers, but feather like structures. Also, yes, Spinosaurus has gotten a Dramatic Overhaul, so much so that its being debated to be a quadruped