Necro

Hmm...would I have chainsaws for limbs, or would it just be my torso and head that turns into one?

Hmm...would that be more useful than uncomfortable?

@Xae; Ah.

...

@TPTI; Hmm...never thought of that...does it have to be related to the source of the powers, or do writers just do that for continuity?

@Bitil; *Heads over to add Bitil*

...

@Xae; Chainsaws down my throat...I feel like this has happened before...

@Xae; DOOOOOOOM.

...

@TPTi; Had a feeling as such. =P

@Xae 1 & TPTi; He means my personal statement.

...

@Xae2; CHAINSAWZZZ.

TPTI iz TPTI again! =-D

OH, now I get it. I haven't read that in so long it didn't make sense at first...

...I am?

...

In seriousness though, erm, why woe is me?

Please explain it in full if you select the latter.

...

Thank you for your (hopefully) continued participation in the CoT RPG S W A R M,

Necro.

I do not wish to do this if you do not want it to happen, however I will not hesitate to enforce my rules. However, your status is cleared if you post an IC before 8:30PM EST tomorrow. Also, since the rule is retroactive and you did not have a chance to inform me of a reason, albeit you should've given one anyway, you will be allowed a one-time exception of listing a reason. Please explain it

You have been inactive for nineteen days. It is my regretful duty to inform you that, in the event that you do not post an IC by Tomorrow, July 20th, before 8:30PM Eastern Standard Time, your character is to be executed by either myself or Crimson Jester, likely a collaborated kill designed via IM, as we have both been kept waiting by your inactivity.

beforehand, they are to be eliminated in a manner seen fit by the executor.

I am writing this comment to inform you that, due to a new rule going into effect both actively and retroactively on July 20th, 2008, to discourage the prolonged an needless absence of members from S W A R M, any characters inactive for 20 days or more unless inactive due to another inactive player or if they informed myself or any of the staff with a reason for their absence beforehand, they are

Please clear out your inbox, as I have to leave this in multiple comments since you have a full inbox.

@Xae; *Turns pages*

...

@Sirius; That reminds me, those are almost a year old...really need to change them...

@Xae; Without you this conversation would fall into LSW and I discussing the differences between England and America and various British things such as good classic rock, Doctor Who and Monty Python. You add spice to it.

...

LSW; ...I like the idea.

@LSW; Indeed he would.

...

@Xae; ...Oh dear.

Indeed. I never suck up to the right person though...and it comes out wrong...like when I sucked out to my boss and it accidentally came out differently than intended, specifically as a homosexual innuendo. >

Well then I believe you should remain non-serious.

Occasionally. You don't more often though. A good thing too, you wouldn't work right all serious.

XD

Actually, I do believe LSW is correct.

ROFLBLEEDING

@LSW; Ah. It could be somewhat offensive, I'd recommend he stop.

...

@Xae; Fair enough.