Colbert Entry posted by Bundalings January 12, 2012 652 views Share More sharing options... Followers 1 If Steven Colbert actually ran for president... I would seriously consider voting for him.
Dorek Posted January 12, 2012 I WOULD vote for him. Of course, they'll probably block him from running like last time, but still. It's great comedy. Quote Link to comment
Bundalings Posted January 12, 2012 Now if it were Jon Stewart, I would definitely vote for him. But Colbert... I mean, pretty much all we see of him is sarcasm. Still, can't be worse than our current options (in this one's opinion, Ron Paul is the only person currently running that is at all promising). Quote Link to comment
Sumiki Posted January 12, 2012 He'd make a great VP though. Stewart/Colbert 2012. Quote Link to comment
Bundalings Posted January 12, 2012 Yes please. This is not a joke. I think they could do some good. Quote Link to comment
Legolover-361 Posted January 12, 2012 I'm not sure whether to laugh at the ridiculousness of Stewart / Colbert running or go look up what their campaign stands for. Or both. I could manage both. Quote Link to comment
xccj Posted January 12, 2012 I did enjoy his segments when he tried to run last time. Although if he did win, then he'd have to give up his show. Quote Link to comment
Sumiki Posted January 12, 2012 I'd vote for Vermin Supreme.Vermin Supreme - the only candidate whose name is funnier than Newt Gingrich. Quote Link to comment
Phyoohrii Posted January 12, 2012 As much of an awesome thing that would be, him/them actually becoming president/vice president would also be the dumbest thing at the same time. Also Stewart wouldn't dare. Anyway, the Super PAC seems to be a much better, more satirical and more ironic (and more effective?) alternative. What happens today and onwards should be hilarious though. Quote Link to comment
D-D-D-Ddude Posted January 13, 2012 Hey, Reagan was an actor, right? Could happen. I really hope he does run though: he's probably our best bet for the GOP. Quote Link to comment
BioGio Posted January 13, 2012 The only issue is that Colbert couldn't use his Super PAC if he were running. Also, Stewart/Colbert is something that I could actually get behind. Quote Link to comment
Sumiki Posted January 13, 2012 The only issue is that Colbert couldn't use his Super PAC if he were running. Also, Stewart/Colbert is something that I could actually get behind.I watched The Colbert Report last night, and Colbert "zapped" the money of the Super PAC over to Stewart, all while parodying the Super PAC system - it was hilarious. Then Colbert said that he was forming an exploratory committee for President of the United States of South Carolina. Balloons fell from the sky. A fanfare began to play. I lol'd. In the end, though, if he's polling better than some of the other candidates, I say why not. Quote Link to comment
BioGio Posted January 14, 2012 I think he was only polling better than Huntsman, but whatever. Quote Link to comment
Bundalings Posted January 15, 2012 Yes, but he wasn't even running, so that's something anyway. Quote Link to comment
14 Comments
Recommended Comments