Jump to content

Akano's Blog

  • entries
    296
  • comments
    724
  • views
    197,801

Complex Numbers


Akano

1,275 views

Math is a truly wonderful topic, and since I'm procrastinating a little on my physics homework, I'm going to spend some time talking about the complex numbers.

 

Most of us are used to the real numbers. Real numbers consist of the whole numbers (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...), the negative numbers (-1, -2, -3, ...), the rational numbers (1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 22/7, ...), and the irrational numbers (numbers that cannot be represented by fractions of integers, such as the golden ratio, the square root of 2, or π). All of these can be written in decimal format, even though they may have infinite decimal places. But, when we use this number system, there are some numbers we can't write. For instance, what is the square root of -1? In math class, you may have been told that you can't take the square root of a negative number. That's only half true, as you can't take the square root of a negative number and write it as a real number. This is because the square root is not part of the set of real numbers.

 

This is where the complex numbers come in. Suppose I define a new number, let's call it i, where i2 = -1. We've now "invented" a value for the square root of -1. Now, what are its properties? If I take i3, I get -i, since i3 = i*i2. If I take i4, then I get i2*i2 = +1. If I multiply this by i again, I get i. So the powers of i are cyclic through i, -1, -i, and 1.

 

This is interesting, but what is the magnitude of i, i.e. how far is i from zero? Well, the way we take the absolute value in the real number system is by squaring the number and taking the positive square root. This won't work for i, though, because we just get back i. Let's redefine the absolute value by taking what's called the complex conjugate of i and multiplying the two together, then taking the positive square root. The complex conjugate of i is obtained by taking the imaginary part of i and throwing a negative sign in front. Since i is purely imaginary (there are no real numbers that make up i), the complex conjugate is -i. Multiply them together, and you get that -i*i = -1*i2 = 1, and the positive square root of 1 is simply 1. Therefore, the number i has a magnitude of 1. It is for this reason that i is known as the imaginary unit!

 

Now that we have defined this new unit, i, we can now create a new set of numbers called the complex numbers, which take the form z = a + bi, where a and b are real numbers. We can now take the square root of any real number, e.g. the square root of -4 can be written as ±2i, and we can make complex numbers with real and imaginary parts, like 3 + 4i.

 

How do we plot complex numbers? Well, complex numbers have a real part and an imaginary part, so the best way to do this is to create a graph where the abscissa (x-value) is the real part of the number and the ordinate (y-axis) is the imaginary part. This is known as the complex plane. For instance, 3 + 4i would have its coordinate be (3,4) in this coordinate system.

 

What is the magnitude of this complex number? Well, it would be the square root of itself multiplied by its complex conjugate, or the square root of (3 + 4i)(3 - 4i) = 9 + 12i - 12i +16 = 25. The positive square root of 25 is 5, so the magnitude of 3 + 4i is 5.

 

We can think of points on the complex plane being represented by a vector which points from the origin to the point in question. The magnitude of this vector is given by the absolute value of the point, which we can denote as r. The x-value of this vector is given by the magnitude multiplied by the cosine of the angle made by the vector with the positive part of the real axis. This angle we can denote as ϕ. The y-value of the vector is going to be the imaginary unit, i, multiplied by the magnitude of the vector times the sine of the angle ϕ. So, we get that our complex number, z, can be written as z = r*(cosϕ + isinϕ). The Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler discovered a special identity relating to this equation, known now as Euler's Formula, that reads as follows:

 

eiϕ = cosϕ + isinϕ

 

 

 

Where e is the base of the natural logarithm. So, we can then write our complex number as z = re. What is the significance of this? Well, for one, you can derive one of the most beautiful equations in mathematics, known as Euler's Identity:

 

e + 1 = 0

 

This equation contains the most important constants in mathematics: e, Euler's number, the base of the natural logarithm; i, the imaginary unit which I've spent this whole time blabbing about; π, the irrational ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter which appears all over the place in trigonometry; 1, the real unit and multiplicative identity; and 0, the additive identity.

 

So, what bearing does this have in real life? A lot. Imaginary and complex numbers are used in solving many differential equations that model real physical situations, such as waves propagating through a medium, wave functions in quantum mechanics, and fractals, which in and of themselves have a wide range of real life application, along with others that I haven't thought of.

 

Long and short of it: math is awesome.

 

akanosigdarkgold.png

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

-Windrider-

Posted

Learning the secrets behind Euler's Identity was one of the reasons why I took an Intro to Complex Analysis course. We learned how to prove it with Maclaurin series in calc class, but I wanted more.

 

Having become so incredibly used to working with real numbers, I found the class to be difficult because it required such a kind of mental paradigm shift. Taking nth roots of complex numbers was terrifically boggling; I was so used to a root's yielding only one number, not n distinct ones as is in the complex case. For things like line integrals in the complex plane I had, thankfully, the vector example to compare things to, as you mentioned. I could say, "Hey, this is just like the integral of f(r(t)) dot r'(t) dt."

 

Later things like Cauchy's Theorem and Formula were completely new and alien, however, and don't get me started on residues and the Residue Theorem. Nightmares!

Eeko

Posted

It's like I can almost understand what you're saying, just four to five years of college away. :P

Dorek

Posted

I understood most of this, and I learned it in junior high/high school.

 

I'm in a math course in my third year of college now (just to fill a requisite because I've been avoiding it the whole time) and we're not even going to be taught about complex numbers.

 

Isn't education great?

Akano

Posted

-Windrider-: I used Cauchy's Residue Theorem recently in solving the Fourier Transform of a hyperbolic secant function (the sech is an example of a self-transform), but I've never officially had contour integration or the like in a math class. Also, the Maclaurin series proof of Euler's Formula is awesome.

 

Also, taking the logarithm of a complex number yields infinite results, which isn't something that happens if you only work with real numbers. This of course leads to infinite values for the logarithms of real numbers as well.

 

Eeko: :lol: I know what you mean. The first time I came across complex numbers was my sophomore year of high school algebra 2 class. We were shown Euler's Identity, but we didn't know the proof for it back then.

 

Dorek: If you don't major in math or physics, you usually don't see much math beyond maybe Calc I (derivatives). A minor in math or major in physics/chemistry, on the other hand... :P

 

akanohi.png

Eeko

Posted

Yeah, my algebra 2 just briefly touched on the complex plane.

Now I'm in Vector Calculus, and still haven't seen or heard from i since. :lol:

Legolover-361

Posted

I lost you at "Math is a truly wonderful topic".

 

Nah, I kid.

 

I lost you at the point where trigonometry concepts entered the description. I haven't learned trigonometry yet -- I'm only beginning a pre-calculus 1 class (at the community college I'm attending, pre-cal 2 covers more trigonometry concepts).

-Windrider-

Posted

I forgot how frustrating logarithms are in the complex plane, especially when defining a branch other than the principal one. It's also good to know the Residue Theorem actually has its usefulness, and that it all wasn't in vain. :P Man, that class got so crazy toward the end, but incredibly fascinating. You said it well: "Math is a truly wonderful topic."

Akano

Posted

-Windrider-: Hence why I do physics: not only do you see the inspiring awe of math, but you see the significance it has in real life.

 

Legolover-361: Yeah, my first in-depth experience with trig was at the end of pre-calculus.

 

Eeko: You may see him yet. I have a feeling that it might be mentioned during vector calculus, but I'm not entirely sure. If you take differential equations you will definitely see i again.

 

akanohi.png

Legolover-361

Posted

I know this is an old entry, but I wanted to return to it now that I'm in a pre-cal 2 class and see if my newborn trig knowledge would help me understand the post better. Considering today's class covered vectors, I understand the majority of this entry now.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...