Jump to content
  • entries
    697
  • comments
    2,107
  • views
    449,543

The Closet


Jean Valjean

2,883 views

:kaukau: There is a conversation I really need to have with my father. Mainly, I will be travelling down to Sioux City a week from now, and I want to take a car so I can bring my sisters with. There's someone I want them to meet, and vice versa.

 

I don't have a car; my father does. Ever the compliant one, he absolutely will not let us use his stuff, and gave a flat "no." I wonder if I should explain to him exactly what's going on, but I'm afraid.

 

See, a couple of days ago I mentioned the term "closet heterosexual", and people took that completely the wrong way. To me, that's not a joking term. I was dead serious, because I would use that term to describe myself sometimes. Sexuality goes over my head, and at times I'm afraid to own up to it, afraid to admit that it influences my agendas. My father has demonized me before for being interested in otherwise very constructive activities because he perceived me as having a certain hidden social agenda.

 

Yet, there's something I'm very serious about. There are things that I want to do with my life, and I have a mission. It goes a bit over my head, and so many ways it's a two person job. I think I met someone who shares my life mission.

 

I feel I ought to be able to tell him, and yet for the stupidest reasons I'm afraid, and these reasons are very unfair. They shouldn't even exist. Why should I be afraid to tell him? There's nothing to be ashamed of here. Yet, I know that he will belittle me for no reason.

 

This isn't high school anymore. I'm not heads over heals, dominated by irrational emotions. This isn't some infatuation or emotional dependency. These objectives fit into a larger picture that, for once, I can see, and I have learned now that there's no such thing as failure and that if one objective fails, it's just a window to more opportunities. So I can live with this not working out, in spite of how good this looks to be at the present. I can say that I'm in a healthy state of mind.

 

It just hurts that he never took me seriously when it mattered the most. He likely will not take me seriously now. That hurts, and I'm afraid. Which is incredibly, incredibly stupid.

 

I always laughed at the concept of the closet. I thought it was ridiculous, because I didn't care about being socially ostracized. That had been my reality all my life, so I learned to roll with it. I didn't hold back, didn't bother hiding who I was, and threw shyness to the wind. Yet, it's pretty different with parents. They hold a certain power over you. You can't just walk up to them and be the alpha male. You can't turn your unique personality into a vessel for leadership, because so long as you're within their household, the parents are the heads.

 

And I have to admit, when I'm serious about something like this, a relationship that could potentially influence the rest of my life if it works out, getting belittled by one of the most significant people in my life hurts. I hate being sensitive to that. I've never been sensitive before. The way I grew up, I only new insults and derision. My father had a way of actively attacking my self-esteem in order to toughen me up, so I toughened up. Grew rhinoceros skin. When I had bullies beat me up every day at school and emotionally abuse me, he told me to deal with it, and eventually I found ways of controlling this world more than it controlled me. And I'm still not the son he wanted.

 

So I developed this "don't deal it if you're not willing to take it." My negative sense of humor, my tendency to get people going and tick people off, my habit of messing with people, all became rather normal. Though I never insulted anyone for their relationships, because that's the one thing I haven't learned to take. There have been so many times that I looked down on people who couldn't handle bullying, or who seemed hypersensitive, and I provoked them for laughs, because that's how I was raised. I still think that there are a lot of hypersensitive people out there who could toughen up, but on certain levels I'm understanding.

 

There was one a college student. He was gay. He and his lover were kissing in an apartment, and someone took pictures from the window and leaked them all over the internet. That man committed suicide. We could look at this from the perspective of problems homosexuals have to face, but I read this from an article written by Leonard Pitts, Jr., who had the good sense to back up and see this from a much more meaningful perspective. He asked you to imagine if this had been a man kissing a woman. Having an intimate moment like that interrupted and degraded would hurt just as much. The end result could very well have been the same. This was a problem of society not knowing to respect a person's boundaries, and not valuing basic human decency.

 

What I took away from this is that when it comes to their relationships, to those things that are very intimate to people, it's completely understandable that they'd be far more sensitive than usual. So I begin to understand the closet. I expect people have powerful, commanding personalities worthy of alpha status, and yet I am learning to forgive them for the hardship of hiding the more intimate areas of their lives. Even the great leaders of our society, from political officials to military generals, clamp up when it comes to their family life. Everyone lives in the closet to some extent. For that, I forgive them, and I sympathize with them. I wish it wasn't that way, and for those who live a closeted life from those who they should trust the most, I pray for you.

 

24601

34 Comments


Recommended Comments



:kaukau: Staying the heck away from the topic is what I've been doing up until this point. I decided to allude to it for once, in the manner I best knew how, while talking about the things I normally talk about. I knew that whatever I said, many would not be content, but I really want to clear some misconceptions about me that I believe are crippling my ability to communicate with people effectively on other things.

 

And may I emphasize once more, since it has repeatedly been brought up, that I was not establishing an equivalency. For the most part, I was echoing Leonard Pitts, who I often disagree with but find very insightful for being able to take a step back and see things in a broader context. Let there be no mistake: he was offended that someone was harassed for his sexuality, but he saw more than just that and fully humanized the victim. For that, I respect him.

 

Is it just that one paragraph that's causing all of the trouble?

 

EDIT: For the record, I have several friends who are homosexual. Which, I know, isn't saying much. But for the record, I never treated them any differently and they seemed to be happy people who, though often frustrated with societal prejudice, didn't seem all that bothered. Perhaps they are more fortunate than other homosexual individuals, but I again affirm that I am going off of what I know.

 

24601

Link to comment

Then do some research.

 

People more articulate then I have made blog entries about this. Talk to them. When a parade of people tell you that you are approaching something in a fundamentally wrong way, when some of them have lived that problem, the proper thing to do is to listen to what they have to say. You seem to be misunderstand what many of them have been telling you.

 

Alot. I checked your edit up there. This issue has killed people. The fundamentals of your approach have done nothing but cause many wonderful wonderful people pain and drudged up horrible memories for them. If you are truly as caring as you claim to be, recongnize that and do something about it.

 

EDIT: And the "I have friends who are X" is only making it worse for the record.

Link to comment

Ignoring race/sex/gender, being "blind" to it - that's bad. That's whitewashing, and inadvertently belittling of different circumstances (despite it usually being completely unintentional, which I understand).

 

Treating all races/sexes/genders and equal and being aware of the different circumstances and acknowledging and understanding them - that's what we all need to strive for. Do you see the difference?

May I just point out that the only universal differences between people of different skin colors are appearance and heritage? I can't speak for everyone, but being half "black", I don't want people to think I'm different because of my skin color no matter what happened to some of my ancestors or what other individuals of dark skin identify with / as.

 

There are cases where a race is closely tied with a culture, but I'm confident in saying that there are exceptions to the rule. I'm just saying that, if my skin color were "white" or "black" instead of tan, I wouldn't be any different save for appearance and heritage.

 

What I'm saying is that treating people of other races like they're different sounds -- and I mean no offense by this -- vaguely racist. I'm probably misunderstanding something, but if I am, correct me.

 

(Yeah, I know this isn't very relevant to the discussion. I just wanted this clarified.)

Link to comment

 

Ignoring race/sex/gender, being "blind" to it - that's bad. That's whitewashing, and inadvertently belittling of different circumstances (despite it usually being completely unintentional, which I understand).

 

Treating all races/sexes/genders and equal and being aware of the different circumstances and acknowledging and understanding them - that's what we all need to strive for. Do you see the difference?

May I just point out that the only universal differences between people of different skin colors are appearance and heritage? I can't speak for everyone, but being half "black", I don't want people to think I'm different because of my skin color no matter what happened to some of my ancestors or what other individuals of dark skin identify with / as.

 

There are cases where a race is closely tied with a culture, but I'm confident in saying that there are exceptions to the rule. I'm just saying that, if my skin color were "white" or "black" instead of tan, I wouldn't be any different save for appearance and heritage.

 

What I'm saying is that treating people of other races like they're different sounds -- and I mean no offense by this -- vaguely racist. I'm probably misunderstanding something, but if I am, correct me.

 

(Yeah, I know this isn't very relevant to the discussion. I just wanted this clarified.)

 

 

Oh no, you misunderstand - I'm not talking about a "fundamental" human difference; I'm talking about difference of experience (i.e., largely due to social factors and pressures, many of which stem from institutional racism). To imply that people should be treated differently or unequally because of race is, as you said, racist. What I was trying to explain was that ignoring race is also subtly racist/whitewashing - I think we can all agree that enforcing homogeneity is culturally insensitive.

Link to comment

 

 

Ignoring race/sex/gender, being "blind" to it - that's bad. That's whitewashing, and inadvertently belittling of different circumstances (despite it usually being completely unintentional, which I understand).

 

Treating all races/sexes/genders and equal and being aware of the different circumstances and acknowledging and understanding them - that's what we all need to strive for. Do you see the difference?

May I just point out that the only universal differences between people of different skin colors are appearance and heritage? I can't speak for everyone, but being half "black", I don't want people to think I'm different because of my skin color no matter what happened to some of my ancestors or what other individuals of dark skin identify with / as.

 

There are cases where a race is closely tied with a culture, but I'm confident in saying that there are exceptions to the rule. I'm just saying that, if my skin color were "white" or "black" instead of tan, I wouldn't be any different save for appearance and heritage.

 

What I'm saying is that treating people of other races like they're different sounds -- and I mean no offense by this -- vaguely racist. I'm probably misunderstanding something, but if I am, correct me.

 

(Yeah, I know this isn't very relevant to the discussion. I just wanted this clarified.)

 

 

Oh no, you misunderstand - I'm not talking about a "fundamental" human difference; I'm talking about difference of experience (i.e., largely due to social factors and pressures, many of which stem from institutional racism). To imply that people should be treated differently or unequally because of race is, as you said, racist. What I was trying to explain was that ignoring race is also subtly racist/whitewashing - I think we can all agree that enforcing homogeneity is culturally insensitive.

 

 

To add to that - saying "we gave blacks equal rights in the sixties, they need to shut up about unfair treatment or whatever, they're equal now" is racist because it denies generations of abuse and systemic inequality, the effects of which continue to be felt today. (Of course, they also continue to happen today - to a lesser extent than in the past, fortunately, but they are by no means gone.)

 

Again - you can't ignore social context in the interest of being colorblind; all it does is worsen the problem.

 

I'm just gonna repeat that one more time: you can't ignore social context of your thoughts, words, and actions, no matter how much you may like to.

Link to comment

I stopped reading the comments about halfway down because I was bored. Just wanted to say I personally think it's nice Kraggh took the time to say he can sympathize with human beings, even if it was worded clumsily.

 

I out.

 

*mic drop*

Link to comment

Oh no, you misunderstand - I'm not talking about a "fundamental" human difference; I'm talking about difference of experience (i.e., largely due to social factors and pressures, many of which stem from institutional racism). To imply that people should be treated differently or unequally because of race is, as you said, racist. What I was trying to explain was that ignoring race is also subtly racist/whitewashing - I think we can all agree that enforcing homogeneity is culturally insensitive.

Okay, thanks for clarifying.

 

I think the term "ignore" is what threw me off. I'm of the school of thought that race really shouldn't count for anything significant. Culture and race, while they can be linked, are separate (I still agree that differences in both should be respected).

Link to comment

I would disagree, in that culture and race and all the fun things that make us unique should be celebrated and enjoyed.

 

How boring then would life be if none of these things mattered to us?

Link to comment

Cultural differences are more significant than racial differences because they pertain to lifestyle rather than appearance.

 

I personally think skin color shouldn't be considered as any more important than the rest of someone's appearance (note that one's overall physical features can be indicative of heritage just as skin color can be). If people are proud of their skin color, that's fine. People just shouldn't draw lines where there ought to be none.

 

Take the U.S.A. A lot of people of different races can coexist in an American culture. Sure, their family histories are different, but differentiating them on the basis of race goes against their unity.

 

I'd say it's not "boring" to consider race of secondary or tertiary importance.

 

Gah, I think I just derailed the discussion. I'll stop. :P

Link to comment

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...