If you ran, it'd be no different if Steve Jobs himself was running.

~EW~

Then vote for me, seeing as I am the sole philospher of the lot.

 

~EW~

Lol, they you're my rival.

If you ran, it'd be no different if Steve Jobs himself was running.

 

~EW~

This will be an interesting race, that it will.

Ok, Stupid Question : Whats a Philspher Thingy

~PG~

Then vote for me, seeing as I am the sole philospher of the lot.

 

~EW~

Lol, they you're my rival.

How so? Are you a philosopher too?

Ok, Stupid Question : Whats a Philspher Thingy

 

~PG~

Oh, please tell me that this post was a dream? Or a nightmare?

A philosopher is someone who loves wisdom and contemplated it. I, as a person who looks into the siiues of ethics, respect and societal de facto, am a philosopher, though I do extend beyond those three things.

~EW~

Then vote for me, seeing as I am the sole philospher of the lot.

 

~EW~

Lol, they you're my rival.

How so? Are you a philosopher too?

In some things, yes. Therefore you are my rival!

Though, on the other hand, I'm not running anymore, so...You technically aren't my rival in that sense.

As of yet I have not seen any detailed blog entries or long posts filled with wisdom from you, so...

True... Though two philosophers... or one, and the other is a fake.

~EW~

Then vote for me, seeing as I am the sole philospher of the lot.

 

~EW~

Lol, they you're my rival.

How so? Are you a philosopher too?

 

Ok, Stupid Question : Whats a Philspher Thingy

 

~PG~

Oh, please tell me that this post was a dream? Or a nightmare?

 

A philosopher is someone who loves wisdom and contemplated it. I, as a person who looks into the siiues of ethics, respect and societal de facto, am a philosopher, though I do extend beyond those three things.

 

~EW~

Oooooh Pick me pick me, I can be wise : "Elect Ew or Adv, I do not. But wise, you are, And votes your will get. by me, I think not."

~PG~

As of yet I have not seen any detailed blog entries or long posts filled with wisdom from you, so...

 

True... Though two philosophers... or one, and the other is a fake.

 

~EW~

That's 'cause I specialize mostly in things that aren't permitted to be discussed on BZP. But anyway... Unless your ideas differ greatly from mine, I shall vote for you and Adv.

Is one of us fake? Maybe. But the fake wouldn't tell, would he?

PG, that is just poor quality imitation Yodaspeak, not exactly words of wisdom. Now, a phrase like "respect is the key" qualify as words of wisdom, depending on how you look at it.

Gravi, I specialize on taboo issues as well (just look at my profile, lol), but I prefer issues of Respectism here as BZP and other sites can learn from it. If I could, BZP would be spammed up by my posts talking about a lot of issues, political and otherwise. But I guess that I have too much repect for the rules.

No, he would not tell. But I hereby assert my genuicity (is that even a word?).

~EW~

Gravi, I specialize on taboo issues as well (just look at my profile, lol), but I prefer issues of Respectism here as BZP and other sites can learn from it. If I could, BZP would be spammed up by my posts talking about a lot of issues, political and otherwise. But I guess that I have too much repect for the rules.

 

No, he would not tell. But I hereby assert my genuicity (is that even a word?).

 

~EW~

Then we have more in common than I thought.

Dunno if it's a word or not (XD), but "Philosopher" is more of a self-given title in cases like this (and we're all philosophers to one degree or another anyway), so debating whether one of us is a "fake" or not really wouldn't serve much purpose.

Same as logician, which could mean that our dearly beloved boney might be a quack. Anyway, I prefer the title of "respectologist," although I hardly use it because of the fact that it is a mouthful and a handful.

~EW~

Or simple the title of "spammer."

~EW~

Or simple the title of "spammer."

 

~EW~

*Bites EW*

Quick! Get him P.E.P.!