So... BZPower Entry posted by cags//cunninghat/2x2b January 31, 2008 2,019 views Share More sharing options... Followers 0 How long until they ban blogs? ~D
cags//cunninghat/2x2b Posted January 31, 2008 No offense meant here, Ca'gerinn, but really, complaining about the staff's rules and especially comparing BZP to Germany in your blog may cause the blogs to be banned. So, in answer to your question, not very long, I think. Banning the blogs cuz they're compared to Germany? Whether I agree with Ca'gerrin or the staff, aside, that would be absolutely ludicrous. Same if they banned all the blogs just because of this debate. That'd pretty much prove my point, methinks. ~D Quote Link to comment
Arch-Angel Posted January 31, 2008 I use(d) my blog to post about my life. Only once had I been warned by B6 because anger got a strong hold on me. So I have to state two things: 1, Thank you for the prviledge of having an Online Journal to look forward to everyday. 2, Thank you for the no swearing rule, because without it, my blog would be Rated-R, as myself. Quote Link to comment
Biomech Posted January 31, 2008 And Biomech, what I do in my personal time does not reflect on my position as staff. If you have a problem, bring it to -me-, not to anyone else. I'll be sure to do that. Quote Link to comment
Lluvio Posted January 31, 2008 @ Blue: Check out the "Cipher" entry. Ah, I see.... but It should be takin up with the people who run the blogs, instead of causing a scene. A private discussion would seem more official and polite. I believe that this is meant to be an entry to make a point, so that's why Ca made this public. I think. Quote Link to comment
Spoony Bard Posted January 31, 2008 @ Blue: Check out the "Cipher" entry. Ah, I see.... but It should be takin up with the people who run the blogs, instead of causing a scene. A private discussion would seem more official and polite. I believe that this is meant to be an entry to make a point, so that's why Ca made this public. I think. The entry was made to complain about our rules. Note how this entry was immediately made after his previous one was closed for rulebreaking. -Omi Quote Link to comment
cags//cunninghat/2x2b Posted January 31, 2008 This entry was made because I see nothing wrong with getting people to stretch their brains a bit. Never presume to know why I do what I do. Ever. ~D Quote Link to comment
Kame Posted January 31, 2008 Oh come on now. You know that they didn't close that because people were stretching there brains. It was because by using the cipher, they weren't sure what you were saying. For all they knew, you were bypassing the word filters. And I'm sure you'll say something like "Well, they should've just solved 'em." They're staff, and busy people all around. They aren't like you and me, who spend most of their day online. They go out and do real things too. Quote Link to comment
cags//cunninghat/2x2b Posted January 31, 2008 Even though it irritates me, I'm not stupid enough to bypass it. And if you think that I'm that stupid.... ~D Quote Link to comment
Spoony Bard Posted January 31, 2008 This entry was made because I see nothing wrong with getting people to stretch their brains a bit. Never presume to know why I do what I do. Ever. ~D Your comments beg to differ: How long until they ban blogs? Y'know, if, every time someone does something, and the staff outlaws that something, soon there won't be anything to post about. Seems to me that most of the stuff you ban is only banned after someone does it. I was under the impression that blogs were supposed to be fun, not some horrible parody of WW2 Germany. And I explained the cipher thing in your entry. You just didn't want to take it. -Omi Quote Link to comment
Kame Posted January 31, 2008 Even though it irritates me, I'm not stupid enough to bypass it. And if you think that I'm that stupid.... ~D Nobody's assuming that you're that stupid. Its a universal rule. It applies to everyone. Quote Link to comment
cags//cunninghat/2x2b Posted February 1, 2008 This entry was made because I see nothing wrong with getting people to stretch their brains a bit. Never presume to know why I do what I do. Ever. ~D Your comments beg to differ: How long until they ban blogs? Y'know, if, every time someone does something, and the staff outlaws that something, soon there won't be anything to post about. Seems to me that most of the stuff you ban is only banned after someone does it. I was under the impression that blogs were supposed to be fun, not some horrible parody of WW2 Germany. And I explained the cipher thing in your entry. You just didn't want to take it. -Omi And, y'know, if I can vent off a bit at BZP while protesting a pointless entry closure, then I will use that opportunity. As I said, don't try to understand why I do things. And don't assume that I have to do things in a certain way. ~D Quote Link to comment
Lluvio Posted February 1, 2008 Never presume to know why I do what I do. Ever. Sorry. Quote Link to comment
Spoony Bard Posted February 1, 2008 And, y'know, if I can vent off a bit at BZP while protesting a pointless entry closure, then I will use that opportunity. Won't help your situation. As I said, don't try to understand why I do things. And don't assume that I have to do things in a certain way. Then don't give us a reason to. -Omi Quote Link to comment
cags//cunninghat/2x2b Posted February 1, 2008 Never presume to know why I do what I do. Ever. Ouch. Sorry. I was talking to Omi. >_< *should remember to use quotes* ~D Quote Link to comment
Bundalings Posted February 1, 2008 A tip: Don't argue with the staff. It ends up with you bludgeoned and bloodied and submissive. I'm talking from personal experience. There IS no signoff. Edit: My spelling is so bad, it sends Teletubbies running for cover. Quote Link to comment
Lluvio Posted February 1, 2008 A tip: Don't argue with the staff. It ends up with you bludgeoned and bloodied and submissive. I'm talking from personal experience. There IS no signoff. Edit: My spelling is so bad, it sends Teletubbies running for cover. I don't see anything that can be lost by arguing as long as the arguments don't become flaming. Quote Link to comment
Spoony Bard Posted February 1, 2008 A tip: Don't argue with the staff. It ends up with you bludgeoned and bloodied and submissive. I'm talking from personal experience. There IS no signoff. Edit: My spelling is so bad, it sends Teletubbies running for cover. I don't see anything that can be lost by arguing as long as the arguments don't become flaming. Comparing us to WWII Germany (or more simply, Nazis), is something that can be taken into consideration for flaming. -Omi Quote Link to comment
cags//cunninghat/2x2b Posted February 1, 2008 A tip: Don't argue with the staff. It ends up with you bludgeoned and bloodied and submissive. I'm talking from personal experience. There IS no signoff. Edit: My spelling is so bad, it sends Teletubbies running for cover. I don't see anything that can be lost by arguing as long as the arguments don't become flaming. Comparing us to WWII Germany (or more simply, Nazis), is something that can be taken into consideration for flaming. -Omi Sorry if it came across as flaming, it's an injoke. ~D Quote Link to comment
Lluvio Posted February 1, 2008 A tip: Don't argue with the staff. It ends up with you bludgeoned and bloodied and submissive. I'm talking from personal experience. There IS no signoff. Edit: My spelling is so bad, it sends Teletubbies running for cover. I don't see anything that can be lost by arguing as long as the arguments don't become flaming. Comparing us to WWII Germany (or more simply, Nazis), is something that can be taken into consideration for flaming. -Omi I never excused that. Quote Link to comment
Ecto Posted February 1, 2008 Hate to say it Cags, but you're making sense and owning at the same time. Quote Link to comment
Spoony Bard Posted February 1, 2008 A tip: Don't argue with the staff. It ends up with you bludgeoned and bloodied and submissive. I'm talking from personal experience. There IS no signoff. Edit: My spelling is so bad, it sends Teletubbies running for cover. I don't see anything that can be lost by arguing as long as the arguments don't become flaming. Comparing us to WWII Germany (or more simply, Nazis), is something that can be taken into consideration for flaming. -Omi Sorry if it came across as flaming, it's an injoke. ~D That really wasn't a joke. -Omi Quote Link to comment
Ecto Posted February 1, 2008 A tip: Don't argue with the staff. It ends up with you bludgeoned and bloodied and submissive. I'm talking from personal experience. There IS no signoff. Edit: My spelling is so bad, it sends Teletubbies running for cover. I don't see anything that can be lost by arguing as long as the arguments don't become flaming. Comparing us to WWII Germany (or more simply, Nazis), is something that can be taken into consideration for flaming. -Omi Sorry if it came across as flaming, it's an injoke. ~D That really wasn't a joke. -Omi Perhaps not to you, but it's an injoke. Quote Link to comment
cags//cunninghat/2x2b Posted February 1, 2008 A tip: Don't argue with the staff. It ends up with you bludgeoned and bloodied and submissive. I'm talking from personal experience. There IS no signoff. Edit: My spelling is so bad, it sends Teletubbies running for cover. I don't see anything that can be lost by arguing as long as the arguments don't become flaming. Comparing us to WWII Germany (or more simply, Nazis), is something that can be taken into consideration for flaming. -Omi Sorry if it came across as flaming, it's an injoke. ~D That really wasn't a joke. -Omi So you're admitting that it's true? ~D Quote Link to comment
Bundalings Posted February 1, 2008 I didn't find it funny. Maybe you should use s more often. There IS no signoff. Quote Link to comment
113 Comments
Recommended Comments