I Need A Better Name... Entry posted by Metallic O'Dalek April 16, 2008 434 views Share More sharing options... Followers 0 For my next name change, I want to go with something that doesn't have "Dalek" in it. Any suggestions?
Metallic O'Dalek Posted April 16, 2008 TMD - No 55555 - Possibly Teebert - No AA - Possibly Quote Link to comment
Ta-metru_defender Posted April 16, 2008 Elysian? Hey, it was a Pillar track... Fireproof works to, . TMD Quote Link to comment
Bundalings Posted April 16, 2008 Does A Llama Eat Kiwis? ~AA -Taipu- (really Bunda) Quote Link to comment
Eranok Posted April 17, 2008 Dalek: The Weak. Dalek: The Great Dalek: Wolfsbane (<I love this one!) Quote Link to comment
Turakii #1 Lavasurfer Posted April 17, 2008 What!? Get rid of Dalek!? What about Sock Fuzz? You never did use that one... Turakii Quote Link to comment
EmperorWhenua Posted April 17, 2008 Does A Llama Eat Kiwis? ~AA -Taipu- (really Bunda) ~EW~ Quote Link to comment
Dorek Posted April 17, 2008 ZOMG invisible comments. Something beginning with E. I'd really rather not have to go back and edit that PBZP blog entry -again-. Quote Link to comment
.:Rohn:. Posted April 17, 2008 Rohn Fan? Hedgehog general awesomenosity? .:>[insert name here]<:.? Oi, -Rohn Quote Link to comment
Metallic O'Dalek Posted April 17, 2008 ~Eranok~ - I said I want something without Dalek. Turakii - Yeah, that's a possibility. Dorek - You'll probably be done with it by the timeI change my name. Quote Link to comment
Arch-Angel Posted April 17, 2008 Does A Llama Eat Kiwis? ~AA -Taipu- (really Bunda) ~EW~ ~AA Quote Link to comment
Metallic O'Dalek Posted April 17, 2008 Then I guess that's a definite possibility. Quote Link to comment
Metallic O'Dalek Posted April 17, 2008 No it doesn't, the 'i' throws it off and the 'e' and 'a' need to be switched. Quote Link to comment
Dorek Posted April 17, 2008 ~Eranok~ - I said I want something without Dalek. Turakii - Yeah, that's a possibility. Dorek - You'll probably be done with it by the timeI change my name. I wouldn't bet on that Quote Link to comment
Bfahome Posted April 21, 2008 No it doesn't, the 'i' throws it off and the 'e' and 'a' need to be switched. It's an anagram, dude. >.> (without the "i") It's still cool, and it seems familiar enough to be recognized. Quote Link to comment
Metallic O'Dalek Posted April 21, 2008 Oh, that's another reason not to use it, I hate anagrams. =)(( Quote Link to comment
24 Comments
Recommended Comments