Would you praise terrorists for the things they do?

I'm sorry, but I have no idea how you can say that. Terrorists bomb people. Kill innocent people. For what? Pleasure. The kill people out of pure pleasure.

I really don't see how you can compare terrorists to spammers. The 'secret stomach message' guy and whatever did no harm. Ok, he broke a rule because he spammed, but he didn't do any real damage. If he sent bad, pornographic PMs or something to many members, then I'd get concerned and I'd ask how can people praise them. But, what we're talking about here are harmless little pranksters who decided to say something funny and got banned for it.

Obviously, someone isn't [in the right mind] going to praise terrorist. But a harmless spammer that a lot of people liked? I can see how people would praise him.

Terrorists do more than just bomb buildings and kill people Velox. In fact they do other things that don't involve killing people. Think about it.

Terrorists do more than just bomb buildings and kill people Velox. In fact they do other things that don't involve killing people. Think about it.

Yes, but they are a major evil. Spammers aren't evil. They're the same as that little prankster in school that likes to throw a paper airplane in class. It breaks a rule, but it does no real damage. People might 'praise' him because it's funny.

I still don't see how you can compare them.

I still don't see how you can compare them.

You missed the comparison.

They are one in the same, you just don't see it clearly. Terrorists blow things up to create chaos and disorder. Spammers spam up boards to create chaos and disorder.

I still don't see how you can compare them.

You missed the comparison.

 

They are one in the same, you just don't see it clearly. Terrorists blow things up to create chaos and disorder. Spammers spam up boards to create chaos and disorder.

Whoa, whoa, whoa . . . how can they be one in the same, in any way? Besides, spammers, in my opinion, do things to be a funny little prankster. And, terrorists don't just do things to create chaos and disorder, but it's much worse than that. Some do it because they clame that their god 'tells' them to. Others for different reasons I'm sure, but I doubt they do all that just to create chaos and disorder.

I still don't see how you can compare them.

You missed the comparison.

 

They are one in the same, you just don't see it clearly. Terrorists blow things up to create chaos and disorder. Spammers spam up boards to create chaos and disorder.

 

Whoa, whoa, whoa . . . how can they be one in the same, in any way? Besides, spammers, in my opinion, do things to be a funny little prankster. And, terrorists don't just do things to create chaos and disorder, but it's much worse than that. Some do it because they clame that their god 'tells' them to. Others for different reasons I'm sure, but I doubt they do all that just to create chaos and disorder.

The basis of their ideals are the same.

And spammers, in -my- opinion (this one being shared by most staff) are an annoyance and create chaos and disorder.

Whatever. You may think whatever you want, I however think differently.

Sorry if I sounded offending, but I had a bad day today.

Whatever. You may think whatever you want, I however think differently.

 

Sorry if I sounded offending, but I had a bad day today.

Come back when you have a good day and a better understanding of spammers.

I may have a better day tomorrow, but never will I have a better 'understanding' of spammers'.

I may have a better day tomorrow, but never will I have a better 'understanding' of spammers'.

See the thing is, you understanding of a spammer is basically someone who should be allowed on BZP.

I may have a better day tomorrow, but never will I have a better 'understanding' of spammers'.

See the thing is, you understanding of a spammer is basically someone who should be allowed on BZP.

I would appreciate it if you wouldn't speak for me. I never said that.

I said a spammer is a prankster that wants to be 'funny'. A terrorist, is a savage killing, wanting to kill.

I see no relation, and I never will.

I may have a better day tomorrow, but never will I have a better 'understanding' of spammers'.

See the thing is, you understanding of a spammer is basically someone who should be allowed on BZP.

 

I would appreciate it if you wouldn't speak for me. I never said that.

 

I said a spammer is a prankster that wants to be 'funny'. A terrorist, is a savage killing, wanting to kill.

 

I see no relation, and I never will.

 

You said they were harmless.

Harmless belong on BZP.

-Omi

I may have a better day tomorrow, but never will I have a better 'understanding' of spammers'.

See the thing is, you understanding of a spammer is basically someone who should be allowed on BZP.

 

I would appreciate it if you wouldn't speak for me. I never said that.

 

I said a spammer is a prankster that wants to be 'funny'. A terrorist, is a savage killing, wanting to kill.

 

I see no relation, and I never will.

 

You said they were harmless.

 

Harmless belong on BZP.

 

-Omi

They do no harm to BZPower itself, except make more work for the staff. Terrorists do much damage.

I may have a better day tomorrow, but never will I have a better 'understanding' of spammers'.

See the thing is, you understanding of a spammer is basically someone who should be allowed on BZP.

 

I would appreciate it if you wouldn't speak for me. I never said that.

 

I said a spammer is a prankster that wants to be 'funny'. A terrorist, is a savage killing, wanting to kill.

 

I see no relation, and I never will.

 

You said they were harmless.

 

Harmless belong on BZP.

 

-Omi

They do no harm to BZPower itself, except make more work for the staff. Terrorists do much damage.

 

Thus saying spammers are allowed on BZP if they are harmless.

But if it makes more work for staff, that means they are harmful and nor harmless.

And ever here of online terrorists?

-Omi

Thus saying spammers are allowed on BZP if they are harmless.

 

But if it makes more work for staff, that means they are harmful and nor harmless.

 

And ever here of online terrorists?

 

-Omi

I never said spammers were allowed on BZP. I don't think they should be, and I'm glad they're not. I think they deserve the punishment they receive. But I also don't think it does any real damage.

Here's an example from my school. We're watching a movie in class, and someone throws paper [or something] at someone. They are caught, and get a detention. Did they do any real harm? No. Are they allowed? No. Are they work for the staff [teachers]? Yes.

And, spammers are not online terrorists [at least, the 'stomach message' type aren't]. Yes, I have heard of them, and those are not harmless.

But I also don't think it does any real damage.

Trying being staff for a change.

-Omi

But I also don't think it does any real damage.

Trying being staff for a change.

-Omi

Yeah, it puts strain on staff members, just like it would to teachers. I've already said that.

Personally, i found it ridiculous. i never understood it and never will.

I understand that it is The Biggest Spam message out there, everybody knows about it(Except New members). I think it's just become something people say when they think spam. Not sure About you, But when someone says BBC, I instantly think of Cajun, DV, ToM and Roa. When someone says Spam, people are likely to think of the Message. It just becomes an Icon for Spam.

But I also don't think it does any real damage.

Trying being staff for a change.

-Omi

 

Yeah, it puts strain on staff members, just like it would to teachers. I've already said that.

 

 

I am telling you from 4 1/2 years of experiance of being staff on this forum. Unless you really taste what I been through, you know nothing of strain.

-Omi

But I also don't think it does any real damage.

Trying being staff for a change.

-Omi

 

Yeah, it puts strain on staff members, just like it would to teachers. I've already said that.

 

 

I am telling you from 4 1/2 years of experiance of being staff on this forum. Unless you really taste what I been through, you know nothing of strain.

 

-Omi

That may be so. But I do know that it's no where near as bad as a terrorist.

But I also don't think it does any real damage.

Trying being staff for a change.

-Omi

 

Yeah, it puts strain on staff members, just like it would to teachers. I've already said that.

 

 

I am telling you from 4 1/2 years of experiance of being staff on this forum. Unless you really taste what I been through, you know nothing of strain.

 

-Omi

 

That may be so. But I do know that it's no where near as bad as a terrorist.

Again terrorists do other things besides bomb buildings. Do you realize this?

-Omi

This is proof that controversial entries get the most comments.

-Sidorak-

But I also don't think it does any real damage.

Trying being staff for a change.

-Omi

 

Yeah, it puts strain on staff members, just like it would to teachers. I've already said that.

 

 

I am telling you from 4 1/2 years of experiance of being staff on this forum. Unless you really taste what I been through, you know nothing of strain.

 

-Omi

 

That may be so. But I do know that it's no where near as bad as a terrorist.

Again terrorists do other things besides bomb buildings. Do you realize this?

 

-Omi

Yes. But they are still no where near as bad as spammers in my opinion.