Jump to content
  • entries
    1,281
  • comments
    6,627
  • views
    278,691

I Supported Him And Now I Am Disappoint


Well, it would appear we're going to war with Afghanistan.

 

boom.gif

 

I'm not getting into the political details, I'll just say that based on history, this is suicide.

 

Soviet Russia. England back when it was the English Empire. Germany. Napoleon's France. Alexander The Great. The Roman Empire. France again, this time in the 20th century. the Crusaders.

 

These are all names of respected political eras and leaders. Except the Crusades depending on who you ask, and Germany in the timeframe I'm referring to, as this was Germany under Kaiser Wilhelm II, and having him as your leader was like having someone born with their foot preemptively in their mouth as your spokesperson. Many of Wilhelm's predecessors were smart men. The adviser to many of them, Otto Von Bismarck, was a genius. Wilhelm, was an cool dude of the highest caliber.

 

But I digress, as I could go on for a while about Wilhelm. Each of these empires and their leaders, if I'm correct, tried to take the middle-east, and notably Afghanistan. What happened to them? After a few years of it they lost, went home sulking, and their government usually had a tendency to fall to pieces one way or another. The English Empire's dissolution and the independence and ratification of other colonies began. The Soviet Union went bankrupt and broke up. Napoleon got exiled again, and this time didn't manage to come back despite logic. I'm probably missing a few since I'm typing this at 4 AM, but the only ones who managed to take it all were the Crusaders, and only because they were even moreso crazy religious extremist murderkillplunder machines than the Islamic extremists at the time, and as a result did things that no sane person would do and caught their opponents completely off guard. Up until they had to defend themselves, at which point it all got taken back because, again, they were murderous nutcases who knew how to attack and destroy, not how to stop multiple opponents from breaking in and overwhelming.

 

But my point is this; you don't go to war with Afghanistan after you've spent nearly ten years fighting Iraq when you're facing an economic crisis and owe billions to other countries. It's like picking a fight with Bruce Lee after spending the last thirty minutes fighting Jackie Chan, and a bunch of guys, along with Jackie Chan, broke your leg between when you fought Jackie Chan and when you challenged Bruce Lee. Oh, and Bruce Lee has the gun and nunchuks you gave him twenty years ago to beat up Yevgeny Leonov with.

 

At the very least if you have to attack Afghanistan, take a few years off, let your popularity build up and give time for the US to lick our wounds, for people to grow to trust you, for political tensions to calm from this state where I'm afraid to affiliate with either party because of how anyone I know from the other party will ostracize me nowadays because of it. But not after all this and so immediately, just look back to 1991, that's as far as you have to look back. It's not a history lesson Mr. President, it's something you lived through and saw with your own eyes. It was two years before I was born and I'm aware of it. I liked you because you seemed like the most sensible of the choices in the final election to me, but now I'm beginning to wonder if it made any sort of difference on a grander scale.

 

Sum it up: Napoleon was better than Obama. Alexander The Great was better than Obama. Caesar was better than Obama. Obama's not terrible, they were all just outstanding. All of them failed at what Obama is about to do, and their governments proceeded to fall apart. I have a very bad feeling about this.

 

I get a feeling this is going to stir some people up, but I figure I'll give intelligent, civil discussion a shot, so I'll leave comments open, albeit I'm going to watchdog myself with this entry.

  • Upvote 1

47 Comments


Recommended Comments



Catra

Posted

Why does history repeat itself? Because God doesn't have TiVo.

 

 

Jokes aside, why are we invading Afghanistan in the first place? o_O

Jonestown Bartender

Posted

Why does history repeat itself? Because God doesn't have TiVo.

 

 

Jokes aside, why are we invading Afghanistan in the first place? o_O

Same reason we invaded Iraq, lol I dun know.

 

 

Afghanistan, the graveyard of empires. I feel that due to a series of unfortunate events the US is going to lose it's place of power in the world and this Afghanistan thing is the final nail in the coffin.

 

 

 

Btw if anyone's going to reply to this with something like "hurr durr merica is the best in the world! were number one durp!"

 

For the sake of argument we might have been once, ###### we might be right now, but no nation in 12,000 years of human history has ever fully recovered from what we've go through in the last 36 years.

Wyrd Bid Ful Araed

Posted

I think Alexander probably would have held onto it if he hadn't foolishly died young. Afghanistan became part of the Seleucid Empire as part of the divvying up of Alexander's old territories. They gave it up as part of a peace settlement with India, along with areas like the Hindu Kush.

We've just been doing post-Alexander civilisation in the classical civilisations section of my archaeology course :P

  • Upvote 1
Than the Moa

Posted

You realize we've been fighting a war in Afghanistan for the past 8 years, right? We invaded that country following the events of 9/11 to find those responsible for the attacks. This isn't anything new. And we aren't going to war "against" Afghanistan, we're continuing our mission to root out al Qaeda and the Taliban.

 

We are also backed by a coalition of 43 other countries, many of them (the UK, Australia, and France included) also pledging to increase the number of troops they have in that country.

 

You also realize that he established a time-table to pull out in 2011 no matter what the situation there is, right?

 

Our government isn't going to suddenly collapse because we're increasing the number of troops fighting an 8 year old war that we will then pull out of in less than 2 years.

  • Upvote 1
BCii

Posted

Oil and opium.

 

Something tells me your President himself doesn't support the war except insofar as he must appear to do so for the sake of the bigger picture. I suspect the man is playing chess with some nasty characters behind the scenes.

 

My intuitive sense of Barack Obama was positive from the start, and has not changed.

 

little-heart.png

Chols

Posted

I just wish he didn't publicly say when he plans to pull out. Now the other side will know too. >.>
Jonestown Bartender

Posted

You realize we've been fighting a war in Afghanistan for the past 8 years, right? We invaded that country following the events of 9/11 to find those responsible for the attacks. This isn't anything new. And we aren't going to war "against" Afghanistan, we're continuing our mission to root out al Qaeda and the Taliban.

 

We are also backed by a coalition of 43 other countries, many of them (the UK, Australia, and France included) also pledging to increase the number of troops they have in that country.

 

You also realize that he established a time-table to pull out in 2011 no matter what the situation there is, right?

 

Our government isn't going to suddenly collapse because we're increasing the number of troops fighting an 8 year old war that we will then pull out of in less than 2 years.

You do know that 16,000 British troops were killed in Afghanistan were killed in the 1860's over just of two months?

Lady Kopaka

Posted

You do know that 16,000 British troops were killed in Afghanistan were killed over just of two months?

You do know that 300,000+ British troops died in World War II? Death is terrible, but if we backed out of that?

 

You realize we've been fighting a war in Afghanistan for the past 8 years, right? We invaded that country following the events of 9/11 to find those responsible for the attacks. This isn't anything new. And we aren't going to war "against" Afghanistan, we're continuing our mission to root out al Qaeda and the Taliban.

 

We are also backed by a coalition of 43 other countries, many of them (the UK, Australia, and France included) also pledging to increase the number of troops they have in that country.

 

You also realize that he established a time-table to pull out in 2011 no matter what the situation there is, right?

 

Our government isn't going to suddenly collapse because we're increasing the number of troops fighting an 8 year old war that we will then pull out of in less than 2 years.

This. And also what BCii said.

 

I've never liked our President to begin with, so I'm somewhat indifferent to this. I'm completely against however, backing out of a war when there's so much on a line. We have a army for a reason, and when we or other countries (especially all those neighboring countries, and innocent people in Afghanistan that are being threatened by extremists) are threatened, I think it's our job to do what we can.

 

I'm not very knowledgeable in all of this, so I apologize if I seem naive. I'm taking this view to be somewhat of a realistic approach. My parents, grandparents, older sisters, and even I have lived in those countries; my parents have definitely seen firsthand on how nasty those places are. My dad can tell you many many stories on this, how we cannot just leave at this moment. Some people there cannot be reasoned with, and if we just left them there they'd be killing off everyone and then expanding to other unprepared countries. I really hate war and I hate to seem like it's the 'only option', but It's better to stop it now, then never.

 

k I hate politics and I don't know how to debate...kthxbai.

  • Upvote 1
Jonestown Bartender

Posted

You realize we've been fighting a war in Afghanistan for the past 8 years, right? We invaded that country following the events of 9/11 to find those responsible for the attacks. This isn't anything new. And we aren't going to war "against" Afghanistan, we're continuing our mission to root out al Qaeda and the Taliban.

 

We are also backed by a coalition of 43 other countries, many of them (the UK, Australia, and France included) also pledging to increase the number of troops they have in that country.

 

You also realize that he established a time-table to pull out in 2011 no matter what the situation there is, right?

 

Our government isn't going to suddenly collapse because we're increasing the number of troops fighting an 8 year old war that we will then pull out of in less than 2 years.

This. And also what BCii said.

 

I've never liked our President to begin with, so I'm somewhat indifferent to this. I'm completely against however, backing out of a war when there's so much on a line. We have a army for a reason, and when we or other countries (especially all those neighboring countries, and innocent people in Afghanistan that are being threatened by extremists) are threatened, I think it's our job to do what we can.

 

I'm not very knowledgeable in all of this, so I apologize if I seem naive. I'm taking this view to be somewhat of a realistic approach. My parents, grandparents, older sisters, and even I have lived in those countries; my parents have definitely seen firsthand on how nasty those places are. My dad can tell you many many stories on this, how we cannot just leave at this moment. Some people there cannot be reasoned with, and if we just left them there they'd be killing off everyone and then expanding to other unprepared countries. I really hate war and I hate to seem like it's the 'only option', but It's better to stop it now, then never.

 

k I hate politics and I don't know how to debate...kthxbai.

They wouldn't be threatened (and nether would we) if we didn't arm them in the 80s.

Lady Kopaka

Posted

They wouldn't be threatened (and nether would we) if we didn't arm them in the 80s.

True; but they still would have found other ways to arm themselves. They aren't stupid, obviously.

Jonestown Bartender

Posted

They wouldn't be threatened (and nether would we) if we didn't arm them in the 80s.

True; but they still would had found other ways to arm themselves. They aren't stupid, obviously.

Yes but then it wouldn't have been our fault.

 

 

This whole problem is our own doing and that's what really makes it wrong.

 

 

 

Also in my opinion, we aren't the worlds superheros and they're is places a lot worse off the Afghanistan but we aren't helping them.

Lady Kopaka

Posted

They wouldn't be threatened (and nether would we) if we didn't arm them in the 80s.

True; but they still would had found other ways to arm themselves. They aren't stupid, obviously.

Yes but then it wouldn't have been our fault.

 

 

This whole problem is our own doing and that's what really makes it wrong.

 

 

 

Also in my opinion, we aren't the worlds superheros and they're is places a lot worse off the Afghanistan but we aren't helping them.

I agree, and disagree. Those people have been battling against western civilizations for thousands of years. While we may have played a part in this, their mindset were already made about this. It is of equal fault.

BCii

Posted

Political discussion is getting a teensy bit political. :rolleyes:

 

There are interests at work here that the average person does not know about, and is not supposed to know about. Any discussion that doesn't take those into account is mere smoke-and-mirrors drama from the higher perspective.

 

little-heart.png

Jonestown Bartender

Posted

They wouldn't be threatened (and nether would we) if we didn't arm them in the 80s.

True; but they still would had found other ways to arm themselves. They aren't stupid, obviously.

Yes but then it wouldn't have been our fault.

 

 

This whole problem is our own doing and that's what really makes it wrong.

 

 

 

Also in my opinion, we aren't the worlds superheros and they're is places a lot worse off the Afghanistan but we aren't helping them.

I agree, and disagree. Those people have been battling against western civilizations for thousands of years. While we may have played a part in this, their mindset were already made about this. It is of equal fault.

I may be a little bit dull on the subject, but I can't find any war that Afghanistan has started.

 

it's always been that someone attempts to invade them and they butcher the people invading.

BCii

Posted

The graveyard of empires. That's about all that really needs to be said here. And as far as I'm concerned, imperialism can go suck a lemon. :D

 

little-heart.png

EmperorWhenua

Posted

Oil and opium.

Bingo. We do have a winner.

 

Something tells me your President himself doesn't support the war except insofar as he must appear to do so for the sake of the bigger picture. I suspect the man is playing chess with some nasty characters behind the scenes.

 

My intuitive sense of Barack Obama was positive from the start, and has not changed.

 

little-heart.png

And I agree with this, too.

 

 

 

Also,

I have a very bad feeling about this.

*Wookiee roar*

 

~EW~

Kyn Ace (III)

Posted

There is no good reason for war.

 

Ever.

it fixes over population...

 

That can be fixed without pointless violence.

Jonestown Bartender

Posted

There is no good reason for war.

 

Ever.

it fixes over population...

 

That can be fixed without pointless violence.

it was a joke.

 

 

But if you want a serious point it helps human evolution in a way.

Kyn Ace (III)

Posted

There is no good reason for war.

 

Ever.

it fixes over population...

 

That can be fixed without pointless violence.

it was a joke.

 

 

But if you want a serious point it helps human evolution in a way.

 

Not in a good way.

Jonestown Bartender

Posted

There is no good reason for war.

 

Ever.

it fixes over population...

 

That can be fixed without pointless violence.

it was a joke.

 

 

But if you want a serious point it helps human evolution in a way.

 

Not in a good way.

There is no good or bad evolution.

 

Only Superior and inferior.

 

 

War style evolution takes us back to that stronger more innovative type of human, even if ultimately self destructive.

Necro

Posted

You realize we've been fighting a war in Afghanistan for the past 8 years, right? We invaded that country following the events of 9/11 to find those responsible for the attacks. This isn't anything new. And we aren't going to war "against" Afghanistan, we're continuing our mission to root out al Qaeda and the Taliban.

 

The Soviets were attacking them for about ten before they collapsed.

 

We are also backed by a coalition of 43 other countries, many of them (the UK, Australia, and France included) also pledging to increase the number of troops they have in that country.

 

Most of whom are also experiencing economic crises, and understandably will worry about themselves before they help us if we're all in a mess.

 

You also realize that he established a time-table to pull out in 2011 no matter what the situation there is, right?

 

The exact same thing has been said hundreds of times in history. It's been held to about seven or eight. "We'll pull out by then!" Then, when "then" comes, we only need a few months more so we stay to finish it! And then a few more. It's a neverending chain of procrastination.

 

Our government isn't going to suddenly collapse because we're increasing the number of troops fighting an 8 year old war that we will then pull out of in less than 2 years.

 

It's a steady slope. I'm not saying we'll descend into anarchy, it's not the best place to live, but Russia is still a world power after the Soviet Union fell apart. All I'm saying is that it's not a smart idea.

 

Oil and opium.

 

That was part of what I wanted to avoid, as it tends to make people's blood boil and accusations of conspiracy theorizing get thrown around.

 

Something tells me your President himself doesn't support the war except insofar as he must appear to do so for the sake of the bigger picture. I suspect the man is playing chess with some nasty characters behind the scenes.

 

My intuitive sense of Barack Obama was positive from the start, and has not changed.

 

little-heart.png

 

Even so though, people's lives are going to be sacrificed for this game you're speaking of, there's a certain point where it begins to seem like enough is enough.

 

I've never liked our President to begin with, so I'm somewhat indifferent to this. I'm completely against however, backing out of a war when there's so much on a line. We have a army for a reason, and when we or other countries (especially all those neighboring countries, and innocent people in Afghanistan that are being threatened by extremists) are threatened, I think it's our job to do what we can.

 

That's the kind of mindset I don't like though, the idea that America has to be the ones to step in and help everyone. There are times where there needs to be a mediator, and if nobody else steps up then sure, but there are times where we need to mind our own business and, as cruel as it sounds, worry less about what happens over there and how the citizens of those countries die, and worry about how our soldiers do.

 

I'm not very knowledgeable in all of this, so I apologize if I seem naive.

 

I don't consider myself heavily knowledgeable on the subject by any means, so there's no need to apologize.

 

I'm taking this view to be somewhat of a realistic approach. My parents, grandparents, older sisters, and even I have lived in those countries; my parents have definitely seen firsthand on how nasty those places are. My dad can tell you many many stories on this, how we cannot just leave at this moment. Some people there cannot be reasoned with, and if we just left them there they'd be killing off everyone and then expanding to other unprepared countries. I really hate war and I hate to seem like it's the 'only option', but It's better to stop it now, then never.

 

I hate to say something like this about someone as mad as he was, but Saddam Hussein had things relatively under control. Again, as history has proven, due to the differences between the Sunis and Shiites, the two of them will constantly be fighting, and it takes someone even more ruthless and iron-fisted than they can be to get them to coexist. There were some outbursts now and then and he was terrible to the citizenry, but he kept them under control for the most part, and when we destabilized their government, whether or not it was good for the citizens, it got rid of the madman who could outcrazy the crazy and keep them in check.

 

There is no good reason for war.

 

Ever.

 

To an extent I agree, but there will always be nutcases, so it's best to be prepared for a fight than to be hoping it doesn't happen and getting beaten to a pulp when it does.

 

And again, while I may feel that war is in no ways a good thing, I'm less against the war and more against continuing it in our current state.

  • Upvote 1
Bundalings

Posted

I just wish he didn't publicly say when he plans to pull out. Now the other side will know too. >.>

trufax

 

Not gonna get into the discussion here, I'm just wondering how this hasn't been locked yet.

 

~Bunda

Kyn Ace (III)

Posted

@Dearest- Mankind needs to evolve past silly frustrations and realize that we're no better than anyone else as long as we're of equal physical and mental health.

 

@Necro- It's best to stop war before it even happens. Burn down the government, emancipate the people.


Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...