blogs_blog_1762

I still like Control best, especially since my theory was almost completely right.

I shall play in a few hours.

I just can't support synthesis or control. In control, you're doing exactly what the Illusive man wanted you to do. Not to mention in the extended version, The Shepard reaper king states something along the lines of "I now have an army that cannot be defied." And I can't stand synthesis either. Not only is it A: Space magic, but B: you are forcibly removing galactic diversity from the galaxy. You were arguing that point just before. And I've honestly never cared that much for EDI. I felt worse for Joker because she was gone. And as much as I love the Geth, none of them are Legion. Besides, if we can rebuild Mass relays without the Reapers, pretty sure rebuilding Geth will be no problem. Pretty sure Quarians have some Geth in their suits as well.

 

~U_K~

How is Destroy better than Control? You're committing genocide! With Control, you retain the lowest amount of casualties while maintaining a freedom of choice that Sythesis takes away. If the price to pay for preserving the most life without taking control away from them is the repurposing of a fleet of starships as the ultimate guardians of the galaxy, then I'll pay that price without a second thought.

I vary per character. Most don't trust themselves with Control, some consider the Geth a valid price to pay (or had already killed them), some chose survival at the cost of diversity, one chose to tell the Catalyst where to stick it.

That one made me smile, even if it felt like Bioware was a little bitter about it.

Destroy, because the Indoctrination theory make sense.

Shepard doesn't die.

He wakes up back on earth.