This entry is locked for exess of WIN

A tip: Don't argue with the staff.

 

It ends up with you bludgeoned and bloodied and submissive.

 

I'm talking from personal experience.

 

There IS no signoff.

 

Edit: My spelling is so bad, it sends Teletubbies running for cover.

I don't see anything that can be lost by arguing as long as the arguments don't become flaming.

Comparing us to WWII Germany (or more simply, Nazis), is something that can be taken into consideration for flaming.

 

-Omi

Sorry if it came across as flaming, it's an injoke.

 

 

~D

That really wasn't a joke.

 

-Omi

 

Perhaps not to you, but it's an injoke.

A joke is still a joke, whether it is in or out. Share your injokes off BZP. Don't bring them here.

So you're admitting that it's true?

No....

I didn't say that. Perhaps fill me in where I do say that we the staff are nazis.

-Omi

So no humor now?

No....

 

I didn't say that. Perhaps fill me in where I do say that we the staff are nazis.

 

-Omi

What you said is that my comment about Nazi Germany wasn't a joke. Which would mean that it's the truth.

Maybe I'm just taking it wrong.

~D

No....

 

I didn't say that. Perhaps fill me in where I do say that we the staff are nazis.

 

-Omi

What you said is that my comment about Nazi Germany wasn't a joke. Which would mean that it's the truth.

 

Maybe I'm just taking it wrong.

 

 

~D

But isn't misinterpretaion banned?

No....

 

I didn't say that. Perhaps fill me in where I do say that we the staff are nazis.

 

-Omi

What you said is that my comment about Nazi Germany wasn't a joke. Which would mean that it's the truth.

 

Maybe I'm just taking it wrong.

 

 

~D

 

But isn't misinterpretaion banned?

Might be, I'm not sure. I'll have to go check rules volume XVIII.

~D

Here's a question Omi. If it was considered flaming, why wasn't it removed?

Good question, -Gato-.

Here's a question Omi. If it was considered flaming, why wasn't it removed?

Prob'ly because the blog staff have a sense of humor.

~D

Here's a question Omi. If it was considered flaming, why wasn't it removed?

1. I don't have the power to edit blogs. Note that I am not a blog leader, nor a gmod, nor an admin.

2. You guys don't report this stuff.

-Omi

1. Sorry I had no idea.

2. Why didn't you?

But the person who closed the entry didn't consider it flaming. Or are you not ready to stand by the decisions of the blog leader?

Adding to what Biomech said, the blog leader should have read the whole entry before closing it. Either he wasn't doing his job or it wasn't flaming.

See, Gato is a member I can respect.

Omi, I'm fairly sure that blog staff have been in and out of this entry since I started it. If it was flaming, as you suggest, and not humor, it would've been deleted by now. Even if no-one reported it.

~D

But the person who closed the entry didn't consider it flaming. Or are you not ready to stand by the decisions of the blog leader?

 

Adding to what Biomech said, the blog leader should have read the whole entry before closing it. Either he wasn't doing his job or it wasn't flaming.

Ummmmmm, what are you talking about?

There was no flaming in his closed entry.

Omi, I'm fairly sure that blog staff have been in and out of this entry since I started it. If it was flaming, as you suggest, and not humor, it would've been deleted by now. Even if no-one reported it.

 

 

~D

You do realize that the only people who can edit comments are blog leaders, gmods, and admins right? None haven't even been online.

-Omi

THEN WHY WAS IT CLOSED?

THEN WHY WAS IT CLOSED?

See Kohaku's comment.

-Omi

Because they didn't know what he was saying. He could of said anything... very bad things. Not suggesting that he did, but better safe than sorry, right?

 

Maybe ciphers could be allowed if they were first approved by staff.

 

BtB

Nope, I didn't. And I wouldn't, either.

~D

See, Gato is a member I can respect.

Why, because of my dashing looks or because I stand up to the staff.

There was no flaming in his closed entry.

So wait, what was all this then?

Comparing us to WWII Germany (or more simply, Nazis), is something that can be taken into consideration for flaming.

 

-Omi

2. You guys don't report this stuff.

I believe I'm misinterpeting something here, would you care to explain?

Because they didn't know what he was saying. He could of said anything... very bad things. Not suggesting that he did, but better safe than sorry, right?

 

Maybe ciphers could be allowed if they were first apporved by staff.

 

BtB

Um... no.

I think what Ca'gerrin is getting at is that blogs should be a place where people can express themselves.

There are some rules that are important, such as no cursing and no linking to other forums, but no ciphers? They're just puzzles. The Fruit War II was closed for being an RPG-like game. I mean, who cares?

~Sidorak The Hunter

There was no flaming in his closed entry.

 

So wait, what was all this then?

Comparing us to WWII Germany (or more simply, Nazis), is something that can be taken into consideration for flaming.

 

-Omi

 

2. You guys don't report this stuff.

 

I believe I'm misinterpeting something here, would you care to explain?

 

It was said in this entry.

And Sidorak, ciphers aren't puzzle. They are codes. Mostly used for messages. Hence coded messages not allowed.

-Omi

Must have been a cypher, because what I saw made no sense.