Jump to content
  • entries
    1,209
  • comments
    13,110
  • views
    297,582

13 Comments


Recommended Comments

He is their antithesis; they cannot exist without him. If he is banned, five more will spring to take his place.

 

Now I'm being slightly sarcastic, but to an extent, I am correct. There will always be lawbreakers. Otherwise, laws couldn't exist, and vice versa. It's a vicious cycle.

Link to comment
Prime example maybe?

 

~AA

Example of what?

He is their antithesis; they cannot exist without him. If he is banned, five more will spring to take his place.

 

Now I'm being slightly sarcastic, but to an extent, I am correct. There will always be lawbreakers. Otherwise, laws couldn't exist, and vice versa. It's a vicious cycle.

Probably true.

Oh. What about him?

He makes my brain shrivle and die with his double standards.

 

BtB

Link to comment
He is their antithesis; they cannot exist without him. If he is banned, five more will spring to take his place.

'Tis possible, but I'm not sure. I think it's more the fact that banning me would prove oh-so-many of my points in a detrimental way for the staff.

 

He makes my brain shrivel and die with his double standards.

 

BtB

Tzeentchtzeentchtzeentchtzeentchtzeentchtzeentchtzeentchtzeentch

 

Or something to that effect. Opinions/tastes/whatever - they change. Some not as fast as others, but they change.

 

Constant states of flux FTW!

 

Now watch me refute that statement the next time someone starts a stupid argument.

 

 

~D

Link to comment
He is their antithesis; they cannot exist without him. If he is banned, five more will spring to take his place.

'Tis possible, but I'm not sure. I think it's more the fact that banning me would prove oh-so-many of my points in a detrimental way for the staff.

 

He makes my brain shrivel and die with his double standards.

 

BtB

Tzeentchtzeentchtzeentchtzeentchtzeentchtzeentchtzeentchtzeentch

 

Or something to that effect. Opinions/tastes/whatever - they change. Some not as fast as others, but they change.

 

Constant states of flux FTW!

 

Now watch me refute that statement the next time someone starts a stupid argument.

 

 

~D

Lulz

 

BtB

Link to comment

Can I start calling Ca "Orwell II"?

 

He basically is.

 

How much you want to bet he'll be a satirical writer in the future?

 

I for one agree with almost everything he says.

 

Shoot, I really am his yes man.

 

I still agree with him.

Link to comment
Can I start calling Ca "Orwell II"?

 

He basically is.

 

How much you want to bet he'll be a satirical writer in the future?

 

I for one agree with almost everything he says.

 

Shoot, I really am his yes man.

 

I still agree with him.

Don't bet on it, I'm not much of a writer.

 

 

~D

Link to comment
Can I start calling Ca "Orwell II"?

 

He basically is.

 

How much you want to bet he'll be a satirical writer in the future?

 

I for one agree with almost everything he says.

 

Shoot, I really am his yes man.

 

I still agree with him.

O_o

 

iagweerejected.gif

 

BtB

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...