I like this entry. I also am thinking about taking a more Roa aproach towards MoCing.

eR

Now your thinking with portals... smartness?

Also isn't it fun to deny construction? Like all those people that post in my Foipnoi Toa topics and say Toa can't be Rahi? Just denying them is sooooo fun.

Well, Draco, that's because they usually aren't.

And I like to try something, and then post that it sucked. It's funny to read peoples replies.

I really want to be able to use more Polygons in my MoCs instead of rambleness.

eR

Again, like I always say. You're welcome to bend the rules until they snap like pieces of brittle taffy. IF YOU DO IT RIGHT.

The so called "rule" is there because people usually don't do it right.

*waits for onslaught of comments that have nothing to say but "Ur doin it rong!"*

Again, like I always say. You're welcome to bend the rules until they snap like pieces of brittle taffy. IF YOU DO IT RIGHT.

This is what I was trying to say.

 

BtB

I also am thinking about taking a more Roa aproach towards MoCing.

 

eR

Take an approach where we can still see what it is you built. In short, don't build a large jumbled mass of near-unrecognizable parts.

Whatever you do, remember to make it aesthetically pleasing. That's why so many people follow the same ideas, because they look better, in general.

It's strange. I'm starting to dislike the "rules" of MOCing more now.

Oh no! You must follow the rules! Otherwise the MOCing Police will come and lock you up!

....

There are no rules in MOCing. It's building things with plastic constuction toys. If there's rules to adhere to in MOCing, then people really are taking it too seriously.

Besides, rules stunt creativity.

Rule 1: There are no rules.

~CK

It's strange. I'm starting to dislike the "rules" of MOCing more now.

This is a good thing.

I also am thinking about taking a more Roa aproach towards MoCing.

 

eR

Take an approach where we can still see what it is you built. In short, don't build a large jumbled mass of near-unrecognizable parts.

 

Whatever you do, remember to make it aesthetically pleasing. That's why so many people follow the same ideas, because they look better, in general.

And comments like that are rather unnecessary, seeing as I don't do it to you. Have some respect and keep those unkind words to yourself.

I rather like Roa's style. It gets a tad cluttered but I expect that of Bionicle anyway. I can't think of one other builder currently taking the risks she is.

I also am thinking about taking a more Roa aproach towards MoCing.

 

eR

Take an approach where we can still see what it is you built. In short, don't build a large jumbled mass of near-unrecognizable parts.

 

Whatever you do, remember to make it aesthetically pleasing. That's why so many people follow the same ideas, because they look better, in general.

 

And comments like that are rather unnecessary, seeing as I don't do it to you. Have some respect and keep those unkind words to yourself.

Elaboration, because I thought that was clear:

If he decides to take a "Roa" approach to MOCing, I want him to leave out your propensity towards clutter and jumble on some of the larger MOCs you build. I just don't like it.

However, if he wants to take your propensity towards fantastic engineering, fantastic part usage, clever configurations, and ridiculous imagination, kudos to him. I just want you guys to do it with less clutter. I think you go overboard on the spikiness too often.

I have to agree with Cajun that you are taking risks no one else is.

Make more sense?

Better.

Next time, try and make a less gravelly approach to things.

Just rememebr that I have been going through some rather intense bad things in my real life lately ok.

if I was You I'd link to cajun's this post in a content block.