Yeah, EW, you can't get more than full

A possible cause is that you may or may not have full proto

How can I check that?

PLZZZZZZZ halp, I think Than hates me.

~EW~

OMG GLITCH.

55555

Because you don't get proto for posting in Q&A.

You get proto for excessive, selfless amounts of help in Q&A. You don't even help out there as often as others do.

This entry should help.

-Omi

I know all about that stuff, Omi. I see a buncha people crying over the same thing, so I made an ironic joke about it. You should know me well enough on here to know that I do many things lightheartedly. -EW

A possible cause is that you may or may not have full proto

How can I check that?

 

 

PLZZZZZZZ halp, I think Than hates me.

 

~EW~

I can not confirm nor deny that statement.

You could always drain your full proto into mine so you could get more =3

Poor EW.

Everybody cry!

I know all about that stuff, Omi. I see a buncha people crying over the same thing, so I made an ironic joke about it. You should know me well enough on here to know that I do many things lightheartedly. -EW

I haven't seen these complaints anywhere.

-Omi

It seems to be enough of a problem that you made a blog entry about it.

And I've never posted in MNQ&A. How come I've never lost any Proto? >

()

You don't get proto for asking lots of questions in NMQ&A, I believe.

Actually,It is possible to get more than +5 proto.

-Nidman

It seems to be enough of a problem that you made a blog entry about it.

Yeah but I don't mock people about it.

Actually,It is possible to get more than +5 proto.

EW isn't special enough to ever get that far.

-Omi

Okay, here's the deal. When I am serious, I look serious; when I al joking, I look noobish. In this entry, I look noobish. As such, this entry could not be a serious question about not getting proto.

You came in and 'corrected' me by pretty much linking me to a lecture. Also note one thing: who made the first comment in your blog entry you linked to? Me. That means I've read it, in whole, and got it. I don't comment on stuff unless I understand it (or would like further explanation) cuz that's how I role.

Look at everyone else in this entry. They all seem to get the joke or play along, even Than. You, on the other hand, did not. Not only that, but you are either blind or incapable to understand my very simple style. Besides, I don't need lectures, even when I must be corrected-- all I'd need is a nudge. Even so, you completely went overboard here.

I'm tired of putting up with your attitude in my most basic things. I suggest you think before you act, and if you can not play along or understand, don't say anything.

And on another note, I've never reported anything or posted in topics for proto or recognition. In real life, I'm a helper; so I am here. Not everyone is an insufferable staff-wannabe. And also, I was starting to actually respect you more than before, but it seems you just blew it down the drain.

I have nothing against you, and this is done not to offend, but rather to make it clear that I'm tired of this.

((And I don't like to remove comments, that's why I've never removed even those that I did not like.))

Finally:

EW isn't special enough to ever get that far.

I take offense to that. It is not your say, and that is translated be me as a personal attack.

~EW~

Okay, here's the deal. When I am serious, I look serious; when I al joking, I look noobish. In this entry, I look noobish. As such, this entry could not be a serious question about not getting proto.

 

You came in and 'corrected' me by pretty much linking me to a lecture. Also note one thing: who made the first comment in your blog entry you linked to? Me. That means I've read it, in whole, and got it. I don't comment on stuff unless I understand it (or would like further explanation) cuz that's how I role.

 

Look at everyone else in this entry. They all seem to get the joke or play along, even Than. You, on the other hand, did not. Not only that, but you are either blind or incapable to understand my very simple style. Besides, I don't need lectures, even when I must be corrected-- all I'd need is a nudge. Even so, you completely went overboard here.

Well if thats the case, I took you as a noob and corrected you.

See I played along. So relax.

And also just because you post doesn't mean you read it. Take BZP as a whole for example.

I'm tired of putting up with your attitude in my most basic things. I suggest you think before you act, and if you can not play along or understand, don't say anything.

If you don't want a lecture, then don't even lecture me.

And on another note, I've never reported anything or posted in topics for proto or recognition. In real life, I'm a helper; so I am here. Not everyone is an insufferable staff-wannabe. And also, I was starting to actually respect you more than before, but it seems you just blew it down the drain.

Well to be honest, that's how I see you. That is how some others see you. That is how you present yourself on the board.

And I don't want your respect. It isn't worth anything to me.

EW isn't special enough to ever get that far.

I take offense to that. It is not your say, and that is translated be me as a personal attack.

It is called a joke.

Now you know how I felt by your entries when I got serious and you were just kidding.

-Omi

The joke was not funny to myself nor others, and as such, the joke was not a joke. It was taken as an insult to my dignity. How can I just be told to 'relax' in that kind of position?

You made the first lecture.

I've spoken to others. They don't see me as a staff wannabe, but as a helper.

Not the same. I'm naturally silly and you're naturally serious.

Looks like we'll just mutually hate each other, huh?

~EW~

Aaaaand as the joke has outlived the laugh, this entry's getting closed.