I agree with you on this (on how you shouldn't judge others by it).

And nothing wrong to consider yourself a great of BZP.

-Omi

*Slow clap*

Hurrah, huzzah

Whatever-ah

It's like judging someone because of their money. "Oh he's so smart because he's so rich" news flash: Smart people are POOR because they don't have the money to show that they're smart duh

Hurrah, huzzah

 

Whatever-ah

 

It's like judging someone because of their money. "Oh he's so smart because he's so rich" news flash: Smart people are POOR because they don't have the money to show that they're smart duh

So apparently were both poor.

Now for my response to your blog post. I don't think someone with -4 proto is necessarily bad. Heck, I have someone on my friends list who has -4, and an old friend was banned for dupe accounts. I have nothing against people with low proto. It does however, in a way, note someone's notable performance if the staff award them with proto...unless they bought a bunch of permier memberships. Those are, if I am correct, how you got both this blog and your proto.

I haven't seen many of your posts lately, so I did not know whether you had positive proto. You haven't seemed to have done anythign wrong, nor much the staff would award Proto for, so I assumed yours was 0 as well. My apologies.

No offense, but I haven't really seen you do anything "Notable; Remarkable; Exceptionally outstanding". The Communism thing throws it your way in my book if you can get that done, but until then, I haven't really seen anything to push you into the definition of "Great" yet.

Again no offense meant, but, as funny as your edits have been, I really haven't seen you "participate in the community with meaningful posts, be able to reason your points reasonably and logically, and give back to the community in a meaningful way", as you phrased it.

if thats the case then there are plenty others besides them that contiute positively.

Hurrah, huzzah

 

Whatever-ah

 

It's like judging someone because of their money. "Oh he's so smart because he's so rich" news flash: Smart people are POOR because they don't have the money to show that they're smart duh

 

So apparently were both poor.

 

Now for my response to your blog post. I don't think someone with -4 proto is necessarily bad. Heck, I have someone on my friends list who has -4, and an old friend was banned for dupe accounts. I have nothing against people with low proto. It does however, in a way, note someone's notable performance if the staff award them with proto...unless they bought a bunch of permier memberships. Those are, if I am correct, how you got both this blog and your proto.

 

I haven't seen many of your posts lately, so I did not know whether you had positive proto. You haven't seemed to have done anythign wrong, nor much the staff would award Proto for, so I assumed yours was 0 as well. My apologies.

 

No offense, but I haven't really seen you do anything "Notable; Remarkable; Exceptionally outstanding". The Communism thing throws it your way in my book if you can get that done, but until then, I haven't really seen anything to push you into the definition of "Great" yet.

 

Again no offense meant, but, as funny as your edits have been, I really haven't seen you "participate in the community with meaningful posts, be able to reason your points reasonably and logically, and give back to the community in a meaningful way", as you phrased it.

The only thing proto represents is how devoted you are to getting it.

Haven't done anything noteworthy? I am one of the very few people on BZP that understands the worth of constructive criticism and actually takes time to give it. Works and school have made it so that I can't give it as often as I like, but I can still perfectly capable of dishing it out as well as taking it when it comes to criticism.

Where have I participated in the community with meaningful posts? Let's start with where I haven't. The only BZP Creative Outlet forums where I have not made any contributions are the Fan Created Games and Bionicle Games and Trivia. I have made meaningful posts in the BBC, Artwork I,II, and III, and the RPG forum. I occasionally contribute to new member Q&A.

You've never seen me argue my points reasonably and logically. I had a three page debate going with Omi on communism, something that normally degenerates into flaming. Once again, I had a meaningful debate with Omi on why people 'hate' him. I am more than perfectly capable of holding my own in an argument and I've proved it several times over.

As stated before I have made huge contributions to the major creation forums. If you have any doubt on whether or not I'm not concerned with the community, just look at my how to comic subsection. I'm trying to improve the one section on BZP that needs it the most (next to comidies and NMQ&A.) BTW, expect an update on that this friday, yes that is a deadline.

if thats the case then there are plenty others besides them that contiute positively.

I am incapable of being aware of the actions of all the members of BZP. I praise what I can see.

Hurrah, huzzah

 

Whatever-ah

 

It's like judging someone because of their money. "Oh he's so smart because he's so rich" news flash: Smart people are POOR because they don't have the money to show that they're smart duh

 

So apparently were both poor.

 

Now for my response to your blog post. I don't think someone with -4 proto is necessarily bad. Heck, I have someone on my friends list who has -4, and an old friend was banned for dupe accounts. I have nothing against people with low proto. It does however, in a way, note someone's notable performance if the staff award them with proto...unless they bought a bunch of permier memberships. Those are, if I am correct, how you got both this blog and your proto.

 

I haven't seen many of your posts lately, so I did not know whether you had positive proto. You haven't seemed to have done anythign wrong, nor much the staff would award Proto for, so I assumed yours was 0 as well. My apologies.

 

No offense, but I haven't really seen you do anything "Notable; Remarkable; Exceptionally outstanding". The Communism thing throws it your way in my book if you can get that done, but until then, I haven't really seen anything to push you into the definition of "Great" yet.

 

Again no offense meant, but, as funny as your edits have been, I really haven't seen you "participate in the community with meaningful posts, be able to reason your points reasonably and logically, and give back to the community in a meaningful way", as you phrased it.

I'm just going to step in and say I dislike people who buy three Premier Memberships, cause Hate is a strong word.

And another thing: I've been at +4 proto before and I'm sure several people here know why I'm not there anymore.