...C'mon, it wasn't that good. Am I the only one who thinks that?

... Nope, I can't really think of any reason not to like it.

It was so surreal and beautiful. The acting certainly wasn't bad. The concept and directing was very interesting as well.

...C'mon, it wasn't that good. Am I the only one who thinks that?

Sorry, you're the only one.

As Bunda said, nothing really wrong with this.

Essentially, flawless.

Plus the best movie ending ever.

-CF

The ending was way too predictable. And as Bunda said, it had a pretty straightforward plot, which was disappointing since it's a Christopher Nolan film.

It was pretty awesome and I actually liked the straightforwardness of the twisted plot because unlike Memento and stuff like that you can actually follow the ideas of what's going on.

A really really good movie!

The ending was way too predictable. And as Bunda said, it had a pretty straightforward plot, which was disappointing since it's a Christopher Nolan film.

The plot was straightforward, I guess, because it told a story and made you keep track of everything. It is not until the end that you think about what you just saw and catch all the little details. Not solely straightforward anymore, now is it?

I don't know if I would call the ending predictable or not.

I smiled as soon as the movie ended, because I knew I had just seen a great movie.

-CF

The van hitting the water and the elevator splooming and Robert talking to his dad and [insert Ellen Page's character] and Robert jumping off the building all in perfect unison was like...epic.

I didn't think it was straightforward, though. I mean, starting off the movie like that and finishing it like that is always a good, confusing technique. And when Cobb is teaching [insert Ellen Page's character] everything about architecture, I barely understood half of what he said. I pretty much understood that scene by looking at the stuff being created around her. And the mirror shattering was also epic.

That's definitely a movie I'm gonna want to see twice, maybe three times.

-SK

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

I think the top was gonna collapse, cause it was starting to shake. When Cobb originally spun the top in dreamworld, it didn't move at all. Not an inch. But when it starts to sway from side to side like it started to do at the end, I knew it was gonna fall.

 

-SK

-CF

Also, why didn't Arthur's totem require some kind of action? Unless we never see it in the movie. But even in that case, if the action is rolling the dice, then what would happen in the dream world and what would happen in the real world?

-SK

It's a loaded die, so it always lands on a certain side.

Granted, if he's not in control of his dream, then there's a 1 in 6 chance it would still land correctly.

-CF

...C'mon, it wasn't that good. Am I the only one who thinks that?

Nope. (:

I mean, I recognize it as a great movie. Perfectly executed and all that, but it just didn't appeal to me.

It becomes less straightforward the more you argue about it. I've seen arguments about what was real and what wasn't that make so much sense. That would be fine if they didn't completely contradict each other.

Laka

And then you realize the top doesn't even matter.

hah

It becomes less straightforward the more you argue about it. I've seen arguments about what was real and what wasn't that make so much sense. That would be fine if they didn't completely contradict each other.

Laka

The contradiction is what makes it great.

-CF

Granted, if he's not in control of his dream, then there's a 1 in 6 chance it would still land correctly.

 

-CF

You know you can roll a die more than once