Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/09/2015 in Blog Comments

  1. HA joke's on you I have experience collecting seven Dragon Balls just to go and beat up somebody I'll see you in 50 episodes *crushes soda can on head and dons battle-ready football jersey*
    5 points
  2. Interesting how this offense has immediatesly demanded physical violence for retribution. Before you can get to my place, you must collect four magical keys, which will test your resolve, bravery, and willingness to look for silly things just to go and beat up somebody.
    5 points
  3. How immature. Tape? Use mounting putty instead to make it look professional! (Cause that's what I did.) Cool stuff!
    4 points
  4. I am so offended that I'm on my way to your place just to tell you off! I mean, I think there's an 82% chance that I'm actually headed in the wrong direction, BUT I WILL GET THERE EVENTUALLY IF I JUST DON'T WASTE TIME ASKING FOR HELP!!1!
    3 points
  5. That is so offensive I'm going to beat you up once I find my way off this back road I've been on for the past 11 hours
    3 points
  6. Gonna pop back in for a quick second. Fishers64 never said she had a problem with this being a lesbian ship. That was entirely inferred by you, and that is not something you can just accuse someone of without evidence. Branding someone a bigot is a hefty claim, and it seriously should not be done casually. If I were to wager a guess, her issue seems more with a hyper-romantic characteristic of society. And if that is what she was getting at, then I honestly don't disagree. Romance is everywhere, and society does put a lot of pressure on people to form romantic relationships. It's why singles consider Valentines Day to be something to dread. Honestly, I think there is this troublesome trope in storytelling and media that implies people cannot be happy unless they are in a romantic relationship. That said, I can't say I support naysaying people just having fun with a ship. People do like romance for a reason, and there is an appeal to it. Especially for LGBT+ couples that have very poor representation in storytelling where by contrast heterosexual relationships run rampant. Also, having LEGO minifigs simply holding hands isn't something I'd consider sensual. Children are perfectly capable of forming crushes that are not sensual.
    3 points
  7. Can I get directions to your place? I hear there is going to be a big showdown there. I don't want to miss out.
    2 points
  8. Why doesn't it belong here? It's a children's toyline. Also what Tekulo said about our over-romanticized culture. And children have no idea what romantic love is. It's this terrible corrupting force, right? When two characters kiss, a children's story is ruined. When I was a kid and I saw a wedding in fiction, I felt my soul die on the spot. Simply terrible. And you know what's even worse? Underrepresented romantic orientations daring to try and see that aspect of themselves in a fictional work. Simply unconscionable. Sure, it might not actually affect other people in any significant way, but it's the principle of it. Forcing all that gotdang fakey "love" stuff in a way that matters to them. What a complete disgrace. edit: i should clarify that second part isn't accusing fishers of anything so much as explaining where my mindset is coming from
    2 points
  9. And yet if I was saying Farran and Emily were meant for each other, you wouldn't have bothered commenting, I bet. If so, please explain why a lesbian relationship is inherently sensual but a heterosexual relationship can be solely romantic. Who said anything about hormones, and who said they don't have real love? You're inferring an awful lot from my entry that isn't there. Unless you're saying somehow romantic love isn't real love, which is completely ridiculous. Also note that there are three other protagonists who I have not said are in romantic relationships with each other, and all five of them are assumedly still friends. I see no erasure of friendship here; it is indeed a very important thing. Why doesn't it belong here? Who arbitrarily decided none of the Elves can ever have romantic feelings for one another? What's so destructive about acknowledging that romantic love is a thing that exists? I'm sorry, but I'm having a ridiculously hard time understanding your thoughts here.
    2 points
  10. I'm sorry, but I cannot in good conscience support this. This is disgusting. This is morally and fundamentally offensive. All of you should be ashamed of yourselves. Haven't you even listened to the song? "Earth moves the air, and the wind feeds the fire". It's clearly either Farran/Aira or Aira/Azari or both. And I shan't be convinced otherwise.
    2 points
  11. In retrospect I'm disappointed that my first comment here wasn't expressing disappointment that the op didn't make any puns regarding the fact that these two literally come prepackaged in a ship.
    2 points
  12. Gotta keep you alive for Book 4 haha just kidding right???
    1 point
  13. I didn't realize this until, like, five minutes ago. I relinquish my title of Pun Queen.
    1 point
  14. Sure, I'm cool with that. Not that there's a lot of evidence for such a relationship... but conversely, there's really no evidence AGAINST it either. And seeing as Lego's probably not going to actually canonize a same-sex relationship in one of their in-house stories in the near future (much as I'd like them to), that's probably as good as we're gonna get.
    1 point
  15. *cue S&T person* THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOVE IN THE ELVENDALE UNIVERSE. Otherwise I could totes see this.
    1 point
  16. I always thought it was teal.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...