Jump to content

Ta-metru_defender

Premier Blog Assistants
  • Posts

    3,462
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

Posts posted by Ta-metru_defender

  1.  

     

    If we're talking about what is and isn't canon, I don't see why we should take their set appearance as 100% canon. Unless the Greg Spirit has specified otherwise, we know from WoS that Muakas don't have treads and are basically built like actual machairodonts; and that ash bears don't actually have a freakishly-enlarged arm. Tarakavas are likely the same. Either that, or they have propellers.

    I don't know how I feel about that. Half of what made Muaka (and Kane-Ra) so cool to me was their tread hind-legs. Why can't the Tarakava be like some amalgamation of crabs and seahorses?

     

    They're described as lizard-like. It makes more sense for them to resemble the things we're told they resemble. As it stands, they hardly fit that description.

     

    Earth lizards are not like Bionicle lizards.

     

    :P

  2. If we're talking about what is and isn't canon, I don't see why we should take their set appearance as 100% canon. Unless the Greg Spirit has specified otherwise, we know from WoS that Muakas don't have treads and are basically built like actual machairodonts; and that ash bears don't actually have a freakishly-enlarged arm. Tarakavas are likely the same. Either that, or they have propellers.

    I don't know how I feel about that. Half of what made Muaka (and Kane-Ra) so cool to me was their tread hind-legs. Why can't the Tarakava be like some amalgamation of crabs and seahorses?

    • Upvote 2
  3.  

     If Lego were open to mature content I'd rather see licensed Mass Effect sets, both system and constraction.

     

    Imagine all the derpy Andromeda faces in Lego form.

     

    Finally, the human heads from SW put to good use.

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...