Jump to content
  • entries
    673
  • comments
    2,447
  • views
    160,744

Re: Wet Mane Ban


Daiker

632 views

Okay why is everyone freaking out I mean this is BZPower not PZPower :wacko:

 

I mean this isn't a strict no-pony website, and I for one doubt people could only think of dumping these pics into their BZP blogs.

 

(This whole pony thing is going overboard and I don't like the sound of a pony-ban)

8 Comments


Recommended Comments

Why would there be a pony ban? There's just the same ban there has always been against sexually explicit and inappropriate images, of which the wet mane fad is a part.

Link to comment

It isn't a pony ban.

 

It's a specific ban of a fad related to MLP that is not appropriate for BZPower. We really want to encourage people to talk about things they like on BZP, especially in the blogs! However, when something breaks the rules, especially in regards to appropriateness, then it cannot be allowed.

Link to comment
There's just the same ban there has always been against sexually explicit and inappropriate images, of which the wet mane fad is a part.

'Scuse me for wondering here, but I'm just not seeing a real connection between "wet manes" and "sexually explicit and inappropriate images". They're a little creepy IMO, but the only thing really inappropriate about it were the comments - which I agree, really had to be toned down.

 

Someone fill me in? Please?

Link to comment
There's just the same ban there has always been against sexually explicit and inappropriate images, of which the wet mane fad is a part.

'Scuse me for wondering here, but I'm just not seeing a real connection between "wet manes" and "sexually explicit and inappropriate images". They're a little creepy IMO, but the only thing really inappropriate about it were the comments - which I agree, really had to be toned down.

 

Someone fill me in? Please?

I believe it was because that what the fad boiled down to was sexually explicit.

 

Apparently.

Link to comment
There's just the same ban there has always been against sexually explicit and inappropriate images, of which the wet mane fad is a part.
'Scuse me for wondering here, but I'm just not seeing a real connection between "wet manes" and "sexually explicit and inappropriate images". They're a little creepy IMO, but the only thing really inappropriate about it were the comments - which I agree, really had to be toned down.

 

Someone fill me in? Please?

I believe it was because that what the fad boiled down to was sexually explicit.

 

Apparently.

Like I said, the only thing that really needed "toning down" were the comments.

Link to comment
Guest kopakanuva13

Posted

From what I gather, looking at what this wet mane thingy is, it would be like posting a bunch of creepy foot photos in your blog and sigs. It's not really explicit per se but it's fetish material and not really kid-friendly.

Link to comment
Why would there be a pony ban? There's just the same ban there has always been against sexually explicit and inappropriate images, of which the wet mane fad is a part.

I wasn't so much implying a pony ban, but implying that at this rate, many people seem to be complaining which would lead to something bigger.

Link to comment

Quoth Deevs himself, "[...] it's what the fad has become on places that aren't BZPower, and that's why they're not allowed."

 

So basically, they were banned because somebody somewhere on the internet used them in an inappropriate manner. Which can be said for pretty much anything you can think of. Seriously.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...