Bionicle 2009 shouldn't even be in the graph. It is too awesome for it.

Bionicle 2009 shouldn't even be in the graph. It is too awesome for it.

I second this opinion.

Bionicle 2009 shouldn't even be in the graph. It is too awesome for it.

I second this opinion.

...

Why? O_o They look more and more like Megabloks, and the pieces keep getting bigger.

Torhuki

Bionicle 2009 shouldn't even be in the graph. It is too awesome for it.

I second this opinion fact.

Fixed.

Takuma Nuva

Ah, you see, I spotted some inaccuracies in that graph.

Fix'd! =D

~ (who is currently running from Tor)

Bionicle 2009 shouldn't even be in the graph. It is too awesome for it.

I second this opinion fact.

Fixed.

 

Takuma Nuva

You have no idea what you're talking about.

Ah, you see, I spotted some inaccuracies in that graph.

 

Fix'd! =D

 

~ (who is currently running from Tor)

Oh, than-- *Rushes after*

Torhuki

Bionicle 2009 shouldn't even be in the graph. It is too awesome for it.

I second this opinion fact.

Fixed.

 

Takuma Nuva

You have no idea what you're talking about.

I don't?

I thought we were talking about the awesomeness which is Bionicle 2009...

Takuma Nuva

In other words, graph = YES.

~ (who is now running from DN too)

*Gasp.* What!? BZPers aren't allowed to have negative opinions of Bionicle!

Turakii

No.

This is at least closer to the truth than yours. >8(

~ (who is now running from all three)

The Count and DudeNuva have it right. =D

*Shanks all of you*

Then you don't like Lego at all? O_o

Torhuki

No.

This is at least closer to the truth than yours. >8(

 

~ (who is now running from all three)

THIS GRAPH IS ON THE BUTTON

Takuma Nuva

The Count and DudeNuva have it right. =D

 

*Shanks all of you*

Then you don't like Lego at all? O_o

 

Torhuki

I'm just too lazy to sift through all the graphs to find out who I agree with.

Hey, it does get the result I'm looking for if everyone dies.

*Shanks everyone again for good measure*

This.

2001 and 2002: Awesome.

2003: Good, but Bohrok-Kal were clones and there was the Vahi Ex Machina. Pretty good story all around, though.

2004: Very different, but good.

2005: Reeeeeeeuuuuuuuuuooooooooooaaaaaaaaa! Bssssh! *Explosion sounds* Some good parts sprinkled in, but Vakama was poorly handled and much of the movie seemed like a way to cash in on Revenge of the Sith.

2006: Fantastic first half, boring second half.

2007: Peppered with occasional good parts, but the cutting of Book 7 messed things up and made it monotonous. Great ending though.

2008: Pretty good all around, incredible ending.

2009: Lookin' good!

all wrong (though Wrink came close)

actual

all wrong (though Wrink came close)

 

actual

YOU KNOW HOW MUCH I HATE YOU FOR STEALING MY JOKE

ARRGHHHHH I WILL HUNT YOU DOWN JOKE STEALER STEALING JOKES FROM MY BRAIN

ARE YOU A TELEPATH.

ARE YOU FROM THE CIA.

2005: Reeeeeeeuuuuuuuuuooooooooooaaaaaaaaa! Bssssh! *Explosion sounds* Some good parts sprinkled in, but Vakama was poorly handled and much of the movie seemed like a way to cash in on Revenge of the Sith.

I actually saw an Episode III trailer using clips from the movie, and you couldn't tell the difference.

Torhuki

2005: Reeeeeeeuuuuuuuuuooooooooooaaaaaaaaa! Bssssh! *Explosion sounds* Some good parts sprinkled in, but Vakama was poorly handled and much of the movie seemed like a way to cash in on Revenge of the Sith.

I actually saw an Episode III trailer using clips from the movie, and you couldn't tell the difference.

 

Torhuki

I know.

Said video is epic.

Agreed.